TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Bacula Enterprise

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/ABacula Enterprise is a data center backup, restore, and recovery solution from Swiss, Dracula-themed software company Bacula Systems.N/A

    NetBackup from Cohesity

    Score7.4 out of 10
    N/ANetBackup, currently in version 11, is a data protection and recovery platform that provides security, automation, and management tools for cloud and on-premises workloads.N/A
    Pricing
    Bacula EnterpriseNetBackup from Cohesity
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Bacula EnterpriseNetBackup from Cohesity
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Bacula EnterpriseNetBackup from Cohesity
    Considered Both Products
    Bacula Systems
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    Bacula cost-benefit ratio is better than all the others, as in addition to having many more integrations with operating systems and hypervisors, it is not necessary to purchase more licenses for backups such as NAS, File to Tape, Cloud, etc.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    We are a data recovery company and we use to receive backup media from several backup systems from the market when the original software can't restore them after data storage accidents or for some other different reasons. Bacula Enterprise is the only software that we never had …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    The guarantee of restoration and security of the company's data, and the possibility of data backup with greater capacity at a lower cost, both in the acquisition of the license and in the annual payments for the guarantee of support and updates is why Bacula Enterprise stacks …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    Lower cost of the tool, no limitation of backup data, and plugins compatible with the type of services we have in our data center.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    Bacula Enterprise has a much more intuitive interface, better performance, and more data backup capacity at a lower price.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    Although it is a well-known and robust solution, it didn't work for us. Bad console, the bad solution to manage, few integrations, very expensive, poor support, that is, it was not difficult to decide on the exchange. In addition to the bad experience to make a DR of the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    Bacula is cheaper.
    Incentivized
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    Bacula Enterprise can do everything that we have needed to do with competing products. It may require a script be written, but there is a massive set of resources available online, and a wealth of experience in the support team that can guide us if needed.
    We selected Bacula …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    Some of the Bacula Enterprise competitors are well fitted for a certain task like Virtual Machines backups or Database backups. Bacula Enterprise, with its flexibility and plugins, was able to achieve the same level of performance of all other tools together, reducing the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    We used Veritas NetBackup for a number of years prior to Bacula Enterprise. We always had annoyances with the configuration and reliability of doing restores when using incremental backups. We also had to change various defaults to get the behavior that we wanted. Bacula …
    Incentivized
    Chose Bacula Enterprise
    Bacula Enterprise is a much lower cost than NetBackup which is what we had been using (and still do use for a few systems).
    Incentivized
    Cohesity
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    41 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    8 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    43 Answers
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    7 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    41 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    8 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    40 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    6 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    41 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    8 Answers
    Features
    Bacula EnterpriseNetBackup from Cohesity
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Bacula Enterprise and NetBackup from Cohesity
    Feature
    Bacula Enterprise
    9.4
    49 Ratings
    11% above category average
    NetBackup from Cohesity
    7.4
    19 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Universal recovery9.11 Ratings6.216 Ratings
    Instant recovery10.034 Ratings4.215 Ratings
    Recovery verification10.042 Ratings3.316 Ratings
    Business application protection3.02 Ratings9.817 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations10.047 Ratings10.017 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification10.048 Ratings10.019 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud10.029 Ratings6.113 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression9.741 Ratings8.819 Ratings
    Snapshots10.036 Ratings3.417 Ratings
    Flexible deployment10.044 Ratings8.915 Ratings
    Management dashboard9.646 Ratings6.816 Ratings
    Platform support10.048 Ratings8.115 Ratings
    Retention options9.749 Ratings8.115 Ratings
    Encryption10.038 Ratings9.815 Ratings
    Enterprise Backup
    Comparison of Enterprise Backup features of Bacula Enterprise and NetBackup from Cohesity
    Feature
    Bacula Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    NetBackup from Cohesity
    9.3
    2 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Continuous data protection00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Replication00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
    Operational reporting and analytics00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
    Malware protection00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
    Multi-location capabilities00 Ratings9.92 Ratings
    Ransomware Recovery00 Ratings8.12 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Bacula EnterpriseNetBackup from Cohesity
    Small Businesses
    BDRShield
    Score6.5 out of 10
    Acronis Cyber Protect
    Score8.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Storage Protect
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Carbonite by OpenText
    Score7.1 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Cloud Backup
    Score7.8 out of 10
    Druva Security Cloud
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Bacula EnterpriseNetBackup from Cohesity
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (49 ratings)
    8.0
    (19 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (6 ratings)
    9.9
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (17 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    9.8
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Bacula EnterpriseNetBackup from Cohesity
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Bacula Systems
    Well suited: - I use it for on premise and cloud backup and recovery and it is excellent for this job. - I also experiment with different hypervisors and till now Bacula seems to work with all of them - Security is really important for me as I had many bad experiences in the past and Bacula solution makes me totally confident. Less appropriate - You need to be experienced Linux user, I had to learn few more things in system to make the best use of it. - It's definitely designed for scalability and bigger companies than mine
    Read full review
    Cohesity
    Veritas NetBackup is well suited for most backups within an organisation. This is from standard filesystem backups to full integrated SQL, Oracle and SAP HANA databases and their associated applications. Where it lacks is point in time recovery, i.e., backups are taken at a specific time and then backed up to either disk or tape, but other backup products allow incremental forever backups that, from the golden copy, allow point in time recovery down to an hour or even a minute. So if that level of granularity is required, then Veritas NetBackup may not be the best product to use.
    Read full review
    Pros
    Bacula Systems
    • Bacula has great plugins that work very accurately
    • Bacula is very simple to use, with a user-friendly web interface that facilitates operation.
    • Bacula performs the backups very accurately which is clearly noticed when a restore is performed
    • Its ease of use helps in training new support team members
    Read full review
    Cohesity
    • The activity monitor allows me to easily see if there are issues with backup jobs or the environment.
    • Community support for NBU is very good. I've been able to research issues with ease and find other users that have been in similar situations.
    • Policy management for backups is very easy and there are lots of options.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Bacula Systems
    • Our team always points out the same problems, I believe that, today, is our biggest complaint: The interface (both graphical and the CLI) still needs improvement.
    • There is no mobile app to manage backups and restores from smartphones
    • Manual installation is time consuming.
    Read full review
    Cohesity
    • Admin console
    • SAP HANA application Templates should also be introduced instead of scripting
    • SAP MAXDB application template should also be introduced
    • Tape Management need improvement
    • MOBILE connectivity is missing
    • Admin console is so simple it should be more funcky or stylish
    • Small database should also be considered for backup
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Bacula Systems
    Easy to use, proactive and effective customer support, and simple deployment method. The high configurability is what makes this tool so effective for my organization - at no point do I have any issues of trust as to the restorability of a fileset. The GUI provided gives clear actionable reports as to the effectivity of the jobs performed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cohesity
    Veritas continues to keep up with the backup game. There virtual machine backup capabilities are now top notch, and I believe they will prove valuable when our cloud presence demands a backup solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Bacula Systems
    This is a hard question. Usability for whom? For someone who is very comfortable at the command line and willing to put in the time to learn Bacula Enterprise's configuration syntax, it's very usable. Just don't expect to be an expert immediately.
    Read full review
    Cohesity
    There is a slight learning curve depending on what you wish to back up. However, as a whole it is fairly easy to use. The reporting of backups gives peace of mind to ensure data is protected. The GUI is intuitive and easy to find the correct areas you need to perform various functions. Recovery is also done via a GUI that is extremely easy to use and select the backup you wish to recover.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Bacula Systems
    They're excellent, fast to respond and knowledgeable. I can't fault the support provided at all. On every occasion that we've had a need to contact them during our evaluation, installation, and use of Bacula Enterprise, they've always given us the help that we required. The responses they provide are detailed and we always feel that they've taken the time to read and understand our issue and give a full and personalized answer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cohesity
    Support is pretty good but it is split between America and outsourced companies so it is hit or miss sometimes. I have actually had to argue with the outsourced support as they sometimes have no practical experience using the software which makes troubleshooting difficult when they have no practical experience using the system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Bacula Systems
    The professor understood the tool very well, it was a fact that he had mastery over the system and knew what he was talking about, clearing up all doubts and passing on all the necessary knowledge so that we could handle Bacula Enterprise in our organization.
    Read full review
    Cohesity
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    Bacula Systems
    Bacula Systems and especially Bacula Brazil were extremely attentive and served us very well, making all implementations or changes work perfectly
    Read full review
    Cohesity
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Bacula Systems
    I used CTERA almost from the time they started up. In short, it was very easy to use but configuration was limited; and in the end the agents were troublesome and I could not restore files. They had one person on staff who was terrific with tech support, when he left support became difficult and I lost confidence. Acronis was my first experience with a bare-metal recovery operation and it was terrific. Really saved the day. I would still be using it except the licensing was difficult and expensive and the software wasn't Linux friendly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cohesity
    CrashPlan has the capability to sync data with a cloud storage source. This is great for a workstation where data is typically only for one user. However, Netbackup does a much better job for maintaining multiple levels of file restores for Enterprise Servers. Netbackup has a superior management console that does not rely on Cloud services in the event of an internet outage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Bacula Systems
    No answers on this topic
    Cohesity
    Veritas NetBackup is very expensive, and I think price is the main reason which some customers don't want to use this solution. The price is fair. Most people have felt this solution was somewhat expensive.
    licensing model is based on the number of NetBackup clients, agents, servers, and options that NetBackup will be protecting or run on. A customer purchases the same number of licenses as the count of clients, agents, servers, and options.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Bacula Systems
    No answers on this topic
    Cohesity
    Education, Consulting and Managed services to keep our business running smooth.They provide the expertise needed to help you bridge the gap between excellent information management solutions and the information essential to help you reach maximum business value. They Meet information management goals with agility and flexibility.
    Comprehensive 24x7 monitoring, management and support of your backup and archiving environments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Bacula Systems
    • Our Disaster Recovery policy in regards to backups and archiving is made possible because of our use of Bacula Enterprise.
    • TCO is very low as the yearly subscription is very competitively priced. Management of the software is very low so we don't have to spend hours maintaining our backups.
    Read full review
    Cohesity
    • We never experienced a significant system or data loss during the time we used NetBackup. We restored individuals files and small databases based upon user mistakes, but we never had to implement a DR plan. From that aspect, it is difficult to evaluate the ROI. Backups are a commodity service. Features are very similar across multiple tools. Once you decide to stay on-prem or move to the cloud, the list of options are narrowed. Then it becomes a matter of price.
    • From an administration and support perspective, the ROI is low. Vendor technical support is not always responsive. The first two tiers of support are not knowledgeable and their typical recommendation is to read the white paper. My small team spent a lot of time troubleshooting NetBackup, often without much vendor help.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots