Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup vs. Spanning Backup

I have yet to identify a short coming with this solution. I have found it easy to configure, manage, and restore items when needed. Barracuda Cloud-to-Cloud Backup is also very proactive at managing our account and assisted us in validating the configuration for any new functions that need to be implemented.

Incentivized

The only issue we have is when we remove the user from the integrated AD group we need to manually go back and remove the licensing, but there is the option to have archived accounts as well for temporary holds in case we want to disable the account in 365/AD, but need to hold on to the backups for a little longer.

Incentivized

• It can cost effectively backup the entire M365 environment and retain backups indefinitely
• Restores can be very grannual, for example to restore single email message
• Implemention of the product is quite easy and fast

Incentivized

• Perpetual email and file backups.
• No limits on backup volume, capacity or file types.
• Excellent Management Console for Administrative users.
• End-user access available for self-management.
• Easy to enable and disable various accounts for backup.
• Easy to restore emails and files from one account to another.

Incentivized

• When performing a restore, the search filter & the mailbox filter button can be confused, depending on what you want to achieve.

Incentivized

• Thus far, Spanning has completely fulfilled all of our backup needs, and we are completely satisfied.
• While we haven't needed technical support yet, we were told that this is conducted via email rather than via phone.

we are pleased about the product. And why change a working software?

Incentivized

Easy to configure, easy to manage, and easy to utilize when needing to recover data. If you have questions or issues, Barracuda support is quick to assist.

Incentivized

It was hands down, one of the easiest solutions to implement overall and has some of the best features also compared to other similar products from many SaaS backup companies. We also integrated the Dark Web monitoring too and it has helped us secure accounts we didn't know had issues, so has improved our security posture too.

Incentivized

I would like a retention option on the data, but since this feature does not currently exist, I give it a 9. Everything has met our standards and needs and we are now freed up from the manual efforts it was taking for backing up Salesforce using the out-of-the-box features of Salesforce.

Incentivized

in a few clicks the backup was running. The first restore was exiting since we didn't know what to expect.

Incentivized

Features wise products are pretty similar, but Barracuda is more cost effective when you take into account students in our organizations. This is the main reason we selected Barracuda, to be to protect all users cost effectively. Veeam might have more features, but the cost of licensing outweighs in favour of Barracuda.

Incentivized

Spanning Backup for G Suite backs up Google Drive files and Unitrends is used for more VM infrastructure.

Incentivized

• Lost productivity when someone deletes a cloud stored item and we can retrieve it.
• Rouge creation of teams and no owners are assigned- we get notified.

Incentivized

• No longer dedicating a resource to manual efforts.
• Less work and money if disaster recovery is needed compared to Salesforce.

Incentivized