Bitbucket Server (discontinued) vs. GitKraken

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bitbucket Server (discontinued)
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) from Atlassian offered a self-hosted source code management solution. The product is no longer available for sale, and support for existing licenses will end in 2024.N/A
GitKraken
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
GitKraken's commit graph helps visualize branch structure and commit history. It helps verify recent Git actions on the repo, and also shows who made what code changes and when, so it’s easier to track down when a bug was introduced and revert back to a previous version. GitKraken Client is a Git GUI that detects and alerts users of potential conflicts so as to prevent them from happening. With itsuser Activity Status, the user can know who is online in the GitKraken Client.
$1,250
per installation
Pricing
Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitKraken
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Installed by You
$1250
per installed license
Hosted by GitKraken
Customized according to the amount of team members.
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitKraken
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitKraken
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitKraken
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitKraken
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(11 ratings)
9.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(2 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Bitbucket Server (discontinued)GitKraken
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
Bitbucket Server would be good to use if you are not extremely reliant on the availability of your code at any given moment. If you have other systems relying on the up status of Bitbucket Server that can cause problems if unable to reach it -- you might consider going with a different product
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
The software is easy to use and share within our team. Licensing and setup is straightforward. The product just works and we love it.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Pull requests / code reviews are simple but effective - it's easy to discuss the changes and enforce quality gates (through integration with Bamboo)
  • The access control model is fairly granular, with per-branch and per-action permission configuration options
  • There are various plugins available to extend functionality, such as SonarQube
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Customizable workflow steps help organize projects
  • Time tracking down to seconds helps to estimate sprints
  • Burndown charts let you know when to plan your next release
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) should be evaluated for implementation based on the capacity of the environment ownership and support.
  • Insights and analytics reports are basic.
  • Bitbucket Server (formerly Stash) as part of Atlassian tools has some restrictions for centralized user management.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Timing Out - when editing a story or bug, occasionally Axosoft will time out and all changes will be lost
  • Viewing past sprints can be hard to locate
  • Multiple users within a Story - Axosoft could do a better job managing multiple users on the same story
  • User Interface isn't entirely user friendly and looks a bit outdated
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
Because we're so locked in, it's likely we'll be using Bitbucket Server for a while, unfortunately.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Usability
Atlassian
The usability of its interface is pretty straight forward when it comes to creating projects and repositories, but when you have to dive into finer grained portions of the UI things can get tricky. If you are used to using tools like GitHub or Gitlab -- Bitbucket is just different enough to be a bother.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
Once you get the hang of Axosoft, I think it's easy to use however... getting the hang of it takes quite a bit of time. Additionally, once Axosoft makes an update, it can be difficult to find your bearings again. Like I said, once you know how to use the product, I think it's easy but it takes a bit to become comfortable and confident with Axosoft
Read full review
Support Rating
Atlassian
Never really needed any support as the application is very easy to set up and maintain. Any questions we had were well documented in their online documentation, and community forum.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
Stash was selected before I was at the company, but we're looking at these alternatives and actively considering switching. Stash seems to have all the necessary features we need to make it work, but it doesn't have any bells and whistles or extra special features that we can use to create more advanced integrations with other products like Jenkins or Amazon Web Services.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
I actually like JIRA better, to me the UI is a lot cleaner. Easier to use, and search tickets.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • Stash has certainly improved the productivity of the team. We no longer have to use Shared Drive on network which is prone to hacks and errors to manage our code.
  • During the process of releases, the release engineering team can pull the latest and approved code from Stash and need not be dependent upon the availability of the developers during their non availability. It improves productivity and fastens the ETA for requests.
  • We have stayed on course for project deadlines since introduction of Stash and helps us achieve the goals of timely completion of projects.
Read full review
GitKraken (formerly Axosoft)
  • Productivity bump for developers over previous software
  • Code is never gone forever and can be found if needed
  • Allows us to collaborate and finish projects faster
Read full review
ScreenShots