Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Brave
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Brave Software’s privacy-oriented browser, combined with its blockchain-based digital advertising platform, aims to provide more secure access to the Web for users, publishers and advertisers. Their mission is to provide users a private, speedier Web experience with much longer battery life, help publishers increase their revenue share, and advertisers to achieve better conversion. Headquartered in San Francisco, Brave currently has over 50 million monthly active users and 15 million daily…N/A
Cloudflare Access
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflare Access is a Zero Trust Network Access (ZTNA) solution that secures internal applications by verifying identity, device posture, and context for every request. It replaces legacy VPNs with a faster, more secure alternative that lives at the network edge.N/A
Forcepoint SWG
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
The Forcepoint ONE Secure Web Gateway (SWG) is one of the three foundational gateways of the Forcepoint ONE all-in-one cloud platform. Forcepoint ONE SWG monitors and controlsany interaction with any website, including blocking access to websites based on category and risk score, blocking download of malware, blocking upload of sensitive data to personal filesharing accounts, detecting shadow IT, and optionally providingRemote Browser Isolation (RBI) with Content Disarm andReconstruction (CDR).N/A
Pricing
BraveCloudflare AccessForcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BraveCloudflare AccessForcepoint SWG
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BraveCloudflare AccessForcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Considered Multiple Products
Brave
Chose Brave
We'll Simply put, we are still using Brave exclusively, so unless we're idiots, which we're not, Brave does a much better job than those other 5. We've also tried using Opera which isn't in the list and same thing, it didn't deliver the performance or features that we needed so …
Cloudflare Access
Chose Cloudflare Access
As long as all Cloudflare products and services rely on anycast technology, in a complex approach Cloudflare is faster and more relevant for cloud applications. The balance between security and performance is fully established. Also, Cloudflare has quite a good stack for API …
Chose Cloudflare Access
Cloudflare Gateway does not require local resources and hardware to implement, is very simple and efficient, easy to use, and has clear analytics. It is backed by a very fast DNS resolver in the market.
Chose Cloudflare Access
Cloudflare was both the most feature-rich and cost-effective of comparisons. Presales engagement understood our challenges and was keen to solve them.
Forcepoint SWG
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) and F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Data Resolve - DLP - inDefend, Clearswift Endpoint Data Loss Protection (DLP) and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
Chose Forcepoint SWG
We actually have replaced Forcepoint Web Security with Zscaler Internet Access and have been extremely happy with the change.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint [Web Security] services are [...] cost-effective and provide better ROI for small/medium and even large enterprises without losing any important features. They also have controls for all the channels and technology areas.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
We were not yet ready to replace the firewall, so we chose a separate solution that integrates with our network. We also looked at Ironport but could not get a supported configuration (our partner did not support it).
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint Web Security provided off-network coverage which was not possible utilizing the on-premises deployment of the Cisco Secure Web Appliance that we were previously using. The Forcepoint Web Security product was more cost-effective for the specific feature set that we …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcpoint Web Security keeps my organization's users safe from malicious threats, including zero-day threats. It protects against zero-day threats with real-time threat intelligence and remote browser isolation, and provides deep content inspection for encrypted and unencrypted …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
I am aware of another cybersecurity specialist in another organization that utilized the Acronis Cyber Cloud for Enterprise but cannot speak to its usage. I can only say that the Forcepoint products and history of support alongside its powerful reputation is one of the largest …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint Web Security is far superior to the rest.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint Web Security stacks up against them because Forcepoint is easy to install and get running. Forcepoint also has great support and notifies our organization when there are updates. I also appreciate the analytics and features Forcepoint has to offer.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
To be honest, once using Forcepoint for our Web Security, I have not wanted to look anywhere else. The dashboard gives me quick insight of threats, productivity, and bandwidth usage. Again, this is a layer in my security and it fills many holes. I feel safe and I do like I can …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
We have evaluated Sophos, however, it proved to be overly complex to manage and administer compared to the Forcepoint solution.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint was one of the first web security appliances deployed by our organisation for content filtering and protecting from other complex web threats.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
We chose Forcepoint Web security over other vendors as it is the best in its class in my opinion. It is used by a number of large organizations and government agencies and it has enormous expansion/integration capabilities with other modules e.g. CASB, DLP which all play a …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint permits out-of-office protection, and the adoption of an endpoint is a good hit for reaching this.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
The only other product that I have used does not stack up against Forcepoint at all. Given that they aren't nearly as powerful as Forcepoint.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
I purchased an up-and-coming product called SurfControl in 1999. Although I don't know who acquired SurfControl or when, I know that I just stuck with it, and I haven't had to evaluate another web security product in over 20 years, and that's a good thing.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
FortiGate offers more granularity over the cloud, but the hybrid seems to be just what we need. We will be moving forward with the hybrid deployment over FortiGate. We would like to thank the POC engineers for helping us make this decision. We look forward to a fruitful …
Chose Forcepoint SWG
We have not evaluated any other products other than Forcepoint as we have been satisfied with the product.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint Web Security is a much more robust web protection suite than TRITON, and much easier to manage once it is implemented.
Chose Forcepoint SWG
Forcepoint's preassigned policies are a great way to get started. Sourcefire was much more transparent on what was happening to each packet and where it came from and to. But adding in rules and fine tuning the URL filtering was difficult. It took considerably more effort to …
Features
BraveCloudflare AccessForcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Brave
-
Ratings
Cloudflare Access
10.0
Ratings
12% above category average
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
-
Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Brave
-
Ratings
Cloudflare Access
10.0
Ratings
11% above category average
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
-
Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Brave
-
Ratings
Cloudflare Access
8.9
Ratings
14% above category average
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
-
Ratings
Network Analytics00 Ratings5.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Brave
-
Ratings
Cloudflare Access
9.3
Ratings
8% above category average
Forcepoint Secure Web Gateway
-
Ratings
Continuous Verification00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Admin Access Control00 Ratings8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings9.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BraveCloudflare AccessForcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.6 out of 10
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Quantum Firewalls and Security Gateways
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BraveCloudflare AccessForcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.8
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
BraveCloudflare AccessForcepoint Secure Web Gateway
Likelihood to Recommend
I use some google services that work better with chrome, other than that, everything seams to work well on Brave. From access to cloud storage, computing, databases, all by keeping my privacy and free from malware, I guess Brave works properly in most cases and scenarios, which is very reassuring for a company like mine.
Read full review
I wanted to securely connect to my servers without getting tracked by malicious attackers, even though I was on public Wi-Fi. Security was my top priority, and I also wanted a setup that was easy and quick to start and provided great network performance. Cloudflare's Zero trust matches my criteria for becoming my first choice.
Read full review
Over the years, [in our experience], the maintenance of the Forcepoint Web Security solution proved to be more cumbersome and troublesome with each version upgrade. In addition, it did not transition well to support the large increase of remote workers. We also experienced weird incompatibilities with the client. We have since replaced this solution with Zscaler Internet Access, a cloud-based secure web gateway solution with a client that behaves as expected, is more flexible, and requires significantly less administration.
Read full review
Pros
  • HTTPS Everywhere Built into Brave is the "HTTPS Everywhere" feature
  • Brave Rewards Users can earn bat tokens by opting into privacy-respecting ads
  • Offers granular control over what to block on websites enhancing privacy
Read full review
  • Block access to known bad, risky, or unwanted destinations at the DNS or HTTP level.
  • Excellent protection for remote users.
  • Best in class browser isolation techniques.
Read full review
  • This package is one of the few that offers a category, quota time, that allows us to limit certain categories and or websites for staff that would normally be blocked for customers and may not be something that is needed in their day to day job duties. We allow staff one hour a day, broken down into six 10 min increments, to visit sites for shopping, travel arrangement and other areas that are more of a personal need than a business need.
  • Forcepoint has a wide selection of categories that can be enabled, quota timed or restricted at a top-level or you can go more granular and drill down to subcategories to allow for only partial access.
Read full review
Cons
  • I don't know what a perfect browser would be
  • It suits our needs as we feel confident when using it
  • Sorry I cannot think of any flaws
Read full review
  • Cloudflare picks the nearest device location to route the traffic, but It would be great if we could select any particular location.
  • Cloudflare enables monitoring for all the connected clients; it would be great if we could monitor any individual client device while keeping some client devices private.
  • Sometimes, its DNS is not able to resolve a few project websites; we have to manually purge the cache and even disable the Security to get the work done. So, it would be better if we could manually provide a DNS list or whitelist some websites.
Read full review
  • The user access logs contain a lot of useless information. I understand this is very hard to tackle as I've seen this across any product that logs web activity.
  • I would like to see more customization options of website block pages.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
It is very stable, the organisation has "locked in" the product and has no plans to change or try another product. We have already renewed our 2019-2020 licenses. It is user friendly and people catch on easily when they first use it. The only downtime is when we install Microsoft updates! It has excellent reporting which help in determining how the organisation's Internet is used and also during both internal and external IT audits.
Read full review
Usability
I'm very happy with it's usage, specially while working with multiple websites at the same time without huge RAM consumption (this is a severe problem in several other browsers).
Read full review
Within a few hours, new engineers are trained in basic tasks and are quite happy they are able to resolve issues independently. After SSO is configured, onboarding is as simple as signing into m365 via a web browser popup.
Read full review
Despite the intimidating Linux CLI when you use the appliance for troubleshooting, the web security usability compensates as most of the Administration of the system is done there. It is GUI based and has an easy to use UI where one can navigate around rather easily like getting reports, checking alerts, looking the whole setup under deployment to check if all services are running in one place though there are other parts to the system.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Good chat support from the portal for basic questions and minor issues. The enterprise support line is provided as well.
Read full review
The is a quick first response to acknowledge your issue and the Engineers never take more than two hours to fix an issue and we hardly get issues looking at the fact that the system is pretty stable. There is also a robust Knowledge Base in the site for known problems.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Research known issues with upgrading from the Support Knowledge base, this will enable you avoid road blocks along the way and reduce your dependence on Forcepoint Support
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We'll Simply put, we are still using Brave exclusively, so unless we're idiots, which we're not, Brave does a much better job than those other 5. We've also tried using Opera which isn't in the list and same thing, it didn't deliver the performance or features that we needed so back to Brave it was. What's unusual to us is that Brave is built on the Chromium platform, so you'd think ChromeOS would be better, but it's not.
Read full review
As long as all Cloudflare products and services rely on anycast technology, in a complex approach Cloudflare is faster and more relevant for cloud applications. The balance between security and performance is fully established. Also, Cloudflare has quite a good stack for API connection protection, like the API Shield example, which makes it more effective compared to F5 for example. Warp as a ZTNA agent gives better visibility and device posture information than FortiClient does.
Read full review
To be honest, once using Forcepoint for our Web Security, I have not wanted to look anywhere else. The dashboard gives me quick insight of threats, productivity, and bandwidth usage. Again, this is a layer in my security and it fills many holes. I feel safe and I do like I can just let it do its thing
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • As a normal user of Brave browser, I can share my experience in terms of personal benefits rather than business objectives. Brave has positively impacted my online experience by prioritizing privacy and providing the option to earn rewards for viewing privacy-respecting ads. The built-in ad-blocking and privacy features have enhanced my online privacy and reduced unwanted tracking. Additionally, the opportunity to earn rewards through the Brave Rewards program adds an extra incentive for using the browser.
Read full review
  • Cloudflare has provided us with 100% uptime even during planned maintenance
  • Cloudflare has reduced time for engineering fixes from hours (or days) to minutes in some cases (primarily through Workers)
Read full review
  • We have had potential malware outbreaks prevented because of Forcepoint Web Security
  • Questionable access of certain materials on the internet has been prevented because of our implementation
  • The organization's network resources now have more bandwidth because of the restrictions the application provides
Read full review
ScreenShots