Built for Teams is an HRIS solution that is designed for small and mid-sized businesses. The vendor’s value proposition is that their employee self-service capabilities help to offload work from valuable HR managers while giving employees direct access to important information. Additionally, the vendor says customers select their solution due to the intuitive user interface and their excellent customer service.
N/A
Brassring
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Brassring, formerly from IBM and part of the Kenexa Talent Acquisition Suite, and now sold by Infinite Computer Solutions, is an enterprise grade ATS and onboarding solution. It allows companies to find the right talent, track and manage candidates, and use candidate data to spot trends within the applicant pool.
N/A
Pricing
Built for Teams
Brassring
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Built for Teams
Brassring
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Built for Teams
Brassring
Features
Built for Teams
Brassring
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.4
6 Ratings
15% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Employee demographic data
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employment history
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organizational charting
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Organization and location management
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
8.0
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
8.7
5 Ratings
6% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Approval workflow
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Balance details
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
9.5
3 Ratings
15% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
View and generate pay and benefit information
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Update personal information
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
10.0
4 Ratings
28% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
Report builder
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pre-built reports
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Built for Teams
10.0
2 Ratings
22% above category average
Brassring
-
Ratings
New hire portal
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Perfect for allowing employees to track their paid time off and sick days. Useful for providing job summaries, explanation of benefits. We don't use it for tracking compensation, but it could be used for that purpose. We also post job announcements on the platform which is useful for me to see what kinds of jobs we are hiring for.
Kenexa is is well suited for any organization that has more than 3000 employees globally. I would not recommend this to startups or a growing organization with less than 3000 employees. But once you cross this number, Kenexa becomes useful and is a brilliant tool for global operations - recruiting. I would recommend this tool to any organization that has offices in many countries/geographies as well.
Kenexa allows Boolean key word search within a particular requisition so it makes sifting through a high number of applicants manageable and effective
Kenexa can be tailored to meet individual business needs. During the time we’ve had Kenexa here I’ve used it in support of a few different business segments and for each the way the system was used to “position” candidate statuses have varied based on the individual need of the business. One example is when interviewing a high volume of applicants internationally, we were able to send qualified applicants through to the “event manager” and it would enable the candidate to select his/her interview date/time based on previously submitted options inputted by our Kenexa users.
Kenexa allows one to customize and score questions for each open requisition that applicants complete as they apply. The system then sorts applicants according to the score of candidate answers allowing for easy sorting of top qualified candidates.
BrassRing's application system for candidates is prone to freezing and crashing in the middle of the application causing potential candidates to lose all progress. I filled out the application myself and witnessed these issues first hand, on top of several complaints I received via phone and email from candidates attempting to apply via the BrassRing service. Also, the Parsing system within the application is not capable of pulling any meaningful information out of text documents.
Each user must be added to each job in order for that job, and the candidates in it, to show up in relevant searches. This becomes a problem when a new team member joins the account and needs access to all of the previous openings just so that they can find candidates already in the system. The account I was working on involved literally hundreds of new openings a month, meaning that any movement of personnel on or off the account would mean having to update potentially thousands of old positions just to allow them to be able to mine the ATS for candidates. I don't see any particular reason why someone with access to the system should have to be given access to each individual job. If a particular position needs to be kept confidential for whatever reason then that individual position should be able to be set to only show to authorized recruiters. The rest of the positions should automatically be searchable by anyone with appropriate access to the ATS to allow for basic level candidate mining and movement.
I am confident that the Kenexa product will continue to evolve to meet the needs of our business in an ever changing work environment. The affiliation with IBM also plays a factor as we have a long standing successful relationship with IBM products. We will be looking to integrate other Kenexa products in the near future to streamline our HR processes.
I feel like I am pretty decent with computers and systems. It was fairly easy to use it after about a week or two . But I have seen people struggle with it as well as some people not use it at all. It can be slow at times and not work at times. But Its a fine system.
It is a very basic system. It may be OK for entry level positions only. The practice of removing CVs while the recruitment process is ON is disturbing and there is no one to explain or to inform why it is being done. Even a routine mail is not sent to the client/consultant. I am surprised how this system is continuing without too many complaints.
Slightly different focuses and I still use both. Microsoft Visio is great for creating all kinds of diagrams. Whereas Built for Tens is more about people management, so you can set up who is where and track their relationships through the other individuals in the organization. it’s all about using the right tool for the job at hand.
SF ATS was not available at the time and Taleo was thought to be too expensive. In retrospect, given the amount of customization and leveraging of other vendor technology for things like analytics I suspect any cost advantage we realized evaporated