Camunda vs. Celonis

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Camunda
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Camunda is a process orchestration tool designed to help organizations design, automate, and improve any process. Built for business and IT collaboration using BPMN and DMN standards, Camunda aims to enable seamless integration across endpoints to transform mission-critical processes.N/A
Celonis
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Celonis is a Process Intelligence platform that helps companies improve their operations, customer experience, and sustainability. The company’s technology provides a digital twin of a company’s processes, giving everyone in the organization a common language and the ability to identify and capture value.N/A
Pricing
CamundaCelonis
Editions & Modules
Self-Managed Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
SaaS Enterprise
Contact Sales
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CamundaCelonis
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
Additional DetailsSnap is Celonis' free-to-use, cloud-based process mining solution, with over 3500 registrants and users. It includes most major features of Celonis, including all functionality found in common process mining tools. It also includes pre-built connectors to ServiceNow and pre-built content to get users started quickly on their process mining journey.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CamundaCelonis
Features
CamundaCelonis
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Camunda
9.0
1 Ratings
33% above category average
Celonis
-
Ratings
API for custom integration9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Camunda
8.0
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Celonis
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
Camunda
8.5
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Celonis
-
Ratings
Process designer9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder5.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Business Process Automation
Comparison of Business Process Automation features of Product A and Product B
Camunda
9.0
1 Ratings
27% above category average
Celonis
-
Ratings
Business Process Modeling9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Decision Modeling9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Mining
Comparison of Process Mining features of Product A and Product B
Camunda
-
Ratings
Celonis
8.0
40 Ratings
7% below category average
Data Connection00 Ratings8.340 Ratings
Process Discovery00 Ratings8.636 Ratings
Visual Process Representation00 Ratings8.637 Ratings
Process Variants00 Ratings8.137 Ratings
Performance Metrics00 Ratings8.237 Ratings
Process Mining Algorithms00 Ratings8.335 Ratings
Root Cause Investigation00 Ratings7.635 Ratings
Process Optimization00 Ratings7.937 Ratings
What-if Analysis00 Ratings6.825 Ratings
Process Compliance and Audit00 Ratings8.032 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CamundaCelonis
Small Businesses
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
Score 9.9 out of 10
Appian
Appian
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Appian
Appian
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CamundaCelonis
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(4 ratings)
9.6
(178 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(8 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.7
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
6.6
(3 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CamundaCelonis
Likelihood to Recommend
Camunda
Camunda Platform is well suited for scenarios where there are different stages in a business flow and the flow is driven by user action at each stage. For example placing of an order on an ecommerce platform. Depending on whether user was able to make the payment or not the workflow would go to dispatch or retry stage. Now the retry stage would trigger further actions like sending follow up emails etc. Likewise, dispatch stage would have a different set of actions. Since every order is important and we need to know where it stands, using Camunda Platform is imperative. Camunda Platform might not be a right choice where just a one off thing needs to be done. For example, uploading of product information by user or periodic processing of heavy images by a worker. These are all either one step processes or periodic automated processes where we can track the status without using a business modeler like Camunda Platform.
Read full review
Celonis
I believe that Celonis is a great tool to use in Uniper, as it can integrate data from different sources into a single platform, making interfaces more accurate and facilitating the monitoring of data flow from one source system to another.
Read full review
Pros
Camunda
  • Asynchronous functionality of Camunda Platform and different types of gateways.
Read full review
Celonis
  • Clear understanding on how the processes really run
  • Excellent solution to support use cases like harmonization, process excellence, audit and compliance
  • High performing methodology to build economic value addressing inefficiencies
  • Perfect to convince clients showing objective evidences
  • Make easy the enterprise collaboration
  • Provide an E2E "movie" of the processes
  • Able to ensure a centric model to connect all the core processes
  • Top performances that save time of the analyst that can spend energy in his real work
  • Excellent ETL, agnostic (able to extrapolate data from many DB)
  • Strong capabilities of the data model
  • Continuous innovation
  • Solid platform to address projects of business process reengineering
Read full review
Cons
Camunda
  • Camunda expects that you will develop your own user interfaces. This is either a benefit or a barrier depending on your perspective on packaged UI.
  • As an open source vendor, Camunda is under-covered in analyst reports.
Read full review
Celonis
  • We had to build a custom dashboard for tracking value realization, as the transformation center was minimal in scope. For a very value-focused company, this area can be improved, which would be incredibly beneficial.
  • The current licensing model sometimes limits the ambitious value goals, as we can't experiment with building analyses in different areas without a long-term license for that process.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Camunda
No answers on this topic
Celonis
We have been able to leverage Celonis [greatly] because of the commitment and support we receive from our data scientist. I strongly believe that we would not be able to accomplish this without her assistance. Moreover, when we escalate matters, the product development is engaged and commits resources to make sure our initiatives/business cases are supported.
Read full review
Usability
Camunda
No answers on this topic
Celonis
It is a great tool but also requires a lot of work to get it into a useable fashion. Part of this is on our end as we don't have the dedicated analyst function yet to really become self-sufficient with Celonis. It also uncovers a lot of data issues or at the very least, multiple rounds of development and data validation are required before getting to a position where the business users feel comfortable with the data being reflected. This is fairly normal with any data-related development effort and perhaps not unique to Celonis.
Read full review
Support Rating
Camunda
Camunda provides pretty standard product support offerings.
Read full review
Celonis
We submit tickets to Celonis through product support. No assistance is generally provided, have to wait and the ticket is then escalated to product support in Germany. Many times we submit the ticket and the support desk asks us the same questions back where they should already have this information.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Camunda
No answers on this topic
Celonis
Celonis has a lot of tools to support the implementation.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Camunda
Lacks good documentation. Training and documentation is geared towards those who are already technically adept. Does not have as many data integrations as other full fledged products. Paid version of Camunda is not as fully fledged as other products.
Read full review
Celonis
The major reason to choose Celonis is that it has enhanced decision-making in filtering the candidates. The frontend designer has nice graphics and has well-designed self-service. I particularly enjoy the visual editor, which allows you to create complicated PQL without having to write any code, as well as the numerous filtering choices, including process mining options.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Camunda
  • The positive impact is that we are able to ensure the business process is being followed and that results in orders getting processed successfully leading to customer satisfaction and revenue
  • Another positive impact is that we are able to track any anomalies and any errors in the order flow and retry them so that users don't have a negative experience.
  • A negative point is that it is an overhead to maintain so there is significant engineering effort getting invested there
Read full review
Celonis
  • The previous IFRS 9 calculation method was reaching its end of life—Celonis is a direct replacement for us.
  • When rebuilding our logic from the old system to the new, it gave us a much-needed opportunity to revamp and standardise company codes and, in some cases, even pick up some errors.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Camunda Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of