S&P Capital IQ vs. LeadsPedia

Cap IQ is well suited for analyzing security pricing and valuation, tracking stock performance over time, looking up comparable transactions, and analyzing valuations on an industry basis. The service is also well suited for charting and data analysis purposes.

Incentivized

Leadspedia is perfect for lead-gen campaigns. It makes tracking very simple. It's great for CPA,CPC and CPL campaigns. I've never tried using it for a CPV type campaign, so I'm not sure how it does with that

Incentivized

• Plugins that change and analyze analysis improve it.
• Capital IQ is user-driven, unlike other market participants, which helps streamline the dashboard and acquire accurate data.
• Any report or analysis delivers the most in fewest words. In this data-driven world.

Incentivized

• LeadsPedia lives and breathes lead and call tracking. Few, if any, platforms do this better.
• LeadsPedia has integrations with several solution providers in the lead gen space, which facilitates lead validation and compliance.
• LeadsPedia's platform is incredibly feature rich, which gives end users plenty of optionality.

Incentivized

• S&P Capital IQ's add-in slows down my Excel when I incorporate formulas into it.
• S&P Capital IQ's algorithms don't necessarily look in the footnotes of company filings, which can make for a less robust analysis of financials and multiples than desired.
• The user interface is not very user-friendly and thus makes maximizing the software's features difficult. It could be more intuitive to use and not so busy (e.g. not so many small icons on one web page). The S&P Capital IQ support team, however, is always available and very helpful.

Incentivized

• I'd love to see LeadsPedia modernize its user interface. The UI already intuitive, but it looks a little outdated.
• I'd love to see LeadsPedia continue integrating with new solution provides in the marketplace. They've done this well, but they should continue these efforts.
• I'd love to see LeadsPedia build out a robust knowledgebase to educate end users on all of their features and functionality.

Incentivized

[It's the] best ever.

Incentivized

We had Capital IQ in addition to Bloomberg. It was much easier for a new person to use Capital IQ than Bloomberg. The ease of use was a huge selling point for us. Yahoo finance on the other hand is free, but you cannot gather all the data you may need in one location like you can in Capital IQ.

Incentivized

Previously, we had to use both CAKE and Invoca seperately. Cake for lead tracking, and Invoca for call tracking. Now we only have to use one platform, Leadspedia. It's much more user friendly, and makes campaign setup incredibly simple. Wish we would've switched to Leadspedia ages ago.

Incentivized

• We were a boutique investment bank, so it helped multiple people doing their job at the same time instead of waiting for a turn on the Bloomberg terminal.
• Brought more interactive reports in PDF format to the table.
• Saved some money, if I have to go basic.

Incentivized

• It has centralized our entire program, and cut back on a lot of manual reporting

Incentivized