Make vs. Google Cloud Pub/Sub

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Make (formerly Integromat) automates integration between applications. It features data transformation capabilities within a no-code graphic interface. The former Integromat was acquired by Celonis in 2020, and the current product Make is a Celonis brand.
$9
per month
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
Google offers Cloud Pub/Sub, a managed message oriented middleware supporting many-to-many asynchronous messaging between applications.N/A
Pricing
MakeGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
per month
Core
$9
per month
Pro
$16
per month
Teams
$29
per month
Enterprise
Contact
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MakeGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
MakeGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
Make
8.3
5 Ratings
3% above category average
Google Cloud Pub/Sub
-
Ratings
Pre-built connectors9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Connector modification9.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration9.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Data quality services8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Data security features7.54 Ratings00 Ratings
Monitoring console6.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MakeGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Small Businesses
Zapier
Zapier
Score 8.9 out of 10
Amazon SNS
Amazon SNS
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.4 out of 10
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.4 out of 10
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MakeGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(5 ratings)
9.8
(7 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(2 ratings)
9.8
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
MakeGoogle Cloud Pub/Sub
Likelihood to Recommend
Celonis
Integromat is the best tool for business automation in my opinion because unlike Zapier it allows us to integrate with any API even if the app is not available which allows us to create automation even with the less known apps that we use or the ones that we built internally for our own company.
Read full review
Google
If you want to stream high volumes of data, be it for ETL streaming or event sourcing, Google Cloud Pub/Sub is your go-to tool. It's easy to learn, easy to observe its metrics and scales with ease without additional configuration so if you have more producers of consumers, all you need to do is to deploy on k8s your solutions so that you can perform autoscaling on your pods to adjust to the data volume. The DLQ is also very transparent and easy to configure. Your code will have no logic whatsoever regarding orchestrating pubsub, you just plug and play. However, if you are not in the Google Cloud Pub/Sub environment, you might have trouble or be most likely unable to use it since I think it's a product of Google Cloud.
Read full review
Pros
Celonis
  • UI/UX Simplicity and Features
  • Workflows are explained in details and even people without IT background can use the tool.
  • Consumption is nicely tracked.
  • Myriad of existing templates, solutions, and readymade connectors.
Read full review
Google
  • With a pub/sub architecture the consumer is decoupled in time from the publisher i.e. if the consumer goes down, it can replay any events that occurred during its downtime.
  • It also allows consumer to throttle and batch incoming data providing much needed flexibility while working with multiple types of data sources
  • A simple and easy to use UI on cloud console for setup and debugging
  • It enables event-driven architectures and asynchronous parallel processing, while improving performance, reliability and scalability
Read full review
Cons
Celonis
  • There are always new platforms and connections that we'd like to see
  • More flexibility in paying for operations (tasks) on a sliding scale, instead of by tier
  • More thorough support documentation on connecting various platforms and troubleshooting errors
Read full review
Google
  • Would be nice if the queue could be extended beyond 7 days.
  • We found it a bit tricky replay unacknowledged messages when needed.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Celonis
No answers on this topic
Google
It serves all of our purposes in the most transparent way I can imagine, after seeing other message queueing providers, I can only attest to its quality.
Read full review
Usability
Celonis
Make's easy to understand user interface helps you to visualize what's happening at all times. Could use some tweaks around the navigation from a scenario specifically in the folders and back navigations. I can't tell you the amount of time wasted in that area. When you branch, you can't bring a branch back together in the same scenario which is kind of a bummer as well.
Read full review
Google
It has many libraries in many languages, google provides either good guides or they're AI generated code libraries that are easy to understand. It has very good observability too.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Celonis
No answers on this topic
Google
I have never faced a single problem in 4 years.
Read full review
Performance
Celonis
No answers on this topic
Google
It's very fast, can be even better if you use protobuf.
Read full review
Support Rating
Celonis
The pricing schema is very attractive, almost 50% lower than the competition. You could start from free and then grow. It has a pretty big library of connections to other apps and services, which really helps you when everything is a mess. Integromat has a really easy-to-use interface. You could do almost everything with fewer than 5 clicks. Scenarios (automation steps to complete a routine) have graphics so you can configure them more easily.
Read full review
Google
They have decent documentation, but you need to pay for support. We weren't able to answer all our questions with the documentation and didn't have time to setup support before we needed it so I can't give it a higher rating but I think it tends to be a bit slow unless you're a GCP enterprise support customer.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Celonis
Integromat allows us to do everything we used to do on Zapier but it doesn't limit us to only the popular apps, with Integromat we're integrating custom APIs and we get data from different servers through GET requests and it's exactly what we needed and Zapier couldn't provide it.
Read full review
Google
Having used Amazon Web Services SNS & SQS I can say that even if the latter may offer more features, Google Cloud Pub/Sub is easier to use. On the other hand, usage of SNS & SQS as well as documentation and troubleshooting is easier with the AWS solution. Since we are not using GCP only for Pub/Sub the choice depends on other variables.
Read full review
Scalability
Celonis
No answers on this topic
Google
You can just plug in consumers at will and it will respond, there's no need for further configuration or introducing new concepts. You have a queue, if it's slow, you plug in more consumers to process more messages: simple as that.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Celonis
  • We used too many credits multiple times and had to buy them additionally, there are no prevention systems to setup to alert before it happens.
  • Some consumption is difficult to understand and requires time and digging.
  • It requires heavy internal effort to simplify things in Make in order for it to operate cheaper.
  • Initial IT setup is paramount and determines a lot.
Read full review
Google
  • Increased Efficiency with reliable and Google managed services up all the time wit Disaster Recovery in place as well
  • Definitely Lower costs being a cloud based solution and easier to setup
  • Faster Project delivery and go to market plan for the business use cases basis this technology at the back end
Read full review
ScreenShots