Celoxis is a Enterprise online project management solution for midsize to large businesses to help them plan and manage complex and diverse project portfolios. The collective suite includes modules for resource management, budgeting, revenue forecasting, time and expense tracking, reporting and team collaboration. Celoxis includes features such as advanced scheduling, which combines real-world conditions, such as resource time off, multi-time zone, part-time resources, working weekends etc.,…
N/A
SugarSync
Score3.6 out of 10
N/A
SugarSync is a cloud storage and backup solution designed for small businesses.
$7.50
per month
Pricing
Celoxis
SugarSync
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
100 GB
$7.49
per month
250 GB
$9.99
per month
500 GB
$18.95
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Celoxis
SugarSync
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Celoxis
SugarSync
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Celoxis and SugarSync
Feature
Celoxis
8.3
4 Ratings
8% above category average
SugarSync
-
Ratings
Task Management
9.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
7.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
7.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Celoxis and SugarSync
Feature
Celoxis
8.3
4 Ratings
8% above category average
SugarSync
-
Ratings
Quotes/estimates
8.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Invoicing
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Celoxis and SugarSync
Feature
Celoxis
-
Ratings
SugarSync
9.4
8 Ratings
11% above category average
Versioning
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Video files
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Audio files
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Document collaboration
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Access control
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
File search
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Device sync
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Celoxis and SugarSync
Feature
Celoxis
-
Ratings
SugarSync
9.7
8 Ratings
11% above category average
User and role management
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
File organization
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Device management
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Celoxis and SugarSync
Celoxis is a great option if you are looking for an affordable, easy to use, easy to integrate project manegement solution. It is very powerful for waterfall project management. I evaluated more than 15 platforms and could not find any with a close evaluation in terms of cost-benefit to Celoxis. Of course there are more powerfull tools, for 10 times the price. So far, for project management, there hasn't been a requirement I haven't been able to solve with some work. It really lacks features for Agile methodologies, even if it provides a Kanban view, so far it doesn't provide and additional agile artifacts. If an organization has already reached a very mature project management practice and needs to improve on program and portfolio management, Celoxis won't provide any useful feature. If the organization has the resources (skills and time mostly) to develop some workflows and customization, it might work but with a limit. Hopefully Celoxis addresses these features in the near future.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
When doing daily jobs, if you’re sharing large files, I think Dropbox works a lot better but if you have a system where you’re working within that system and you want to be able to work with that system and have certain folders that you have access to all the time then SugarSync might be just the ticket.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Can only think of one thing. I have helped others to get going with SugarSync and they if they have problems it is understanding the cloud.... So maybe (if it dosen't exist already) I would like to have a animation of the proces with "flying" folders between desktops, clouds etc. Otherwise SugarSync is just great.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I used an evalaution matrix built with input of several stakeholders in the company. In the end the matrix included 100 features (non of them was price related). The matrix was heavily focused on waterfall project management, agile related features were only 5 out of 100 features. Features were labeled as mandatory, required or optional. Products which lacked a mandatory feature (like providing technical support) were disqualified. Then a price vs features evaluation was made and only the products with the best combination were seleced to continue: Celoxis, ITM Platform and Mission Control. A final technical evaluation was made comparing the full evaluation but also the evaluation of only the 40 required features. Overall, Celoxis was the better evaluated (76% vs 65% of the second place), for the 40 required features, Celoxis got 91% against 78% of number 2. In the end we chose Celoxis even when it had higher licensing cost.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
SugarSync, like all solutions, has its place in the data storage stack within a company. The main reason SugarSync is better than the other solutions is that it enables me to leave my hard drive organized and keep my existing file trees. I don't have to constantly move or copy files to a specific folder if I want them backed up.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info