Certinia FM Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
PaySimple
Score6 out of 10
N/A
PaySimple is a payment gateway software solution offered by PaySimple.
$59.95
per month
Pricing
Certinia FM Cloud
PaySimple
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Subscription
$59.95
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia FM Cloud
PaySimple
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
Certinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Certinia FM Cloud
PaySimple
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
2 Ratings
11% above category average
PaySimple
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
4 Ratings
11% above category average
PaySimple
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
8.84 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
5 Ratings
0% above category average
PaySimple
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
8.65 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.15 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
5 Ratings
5% above category average
PaySimple
-
Ratings
Dashboards
8.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
6.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
8.85 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
6 Ratings
2% above category average
PaySimple
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.14 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
10.0
3 Ratings
23% above category average
PaySimple
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
2% above category average
PaySimple
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.7
1 Ratings
14% above category average
PaySimple
-
Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
20% above category average
PaySimple
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.2
1 Ratings
14% above category average
PaySimple
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payment Gateways
Comparison of Payment Gateways features of Certinia FM Cloud and PaySimple
For accounting systems, users and/or evaluators often want to see some type of matrix or "heads up" comparisons of specific features and functionality of a system in key areas such as: 1) General Ledger 2) Order to Cash cycle 3) Purchase to Pay cycle 4) Cash management 5) Inventory and/or Cost Accounting (Projects/Jobs, etc) 6) Revenue Recognition 7) Fixed Assets management 8) Budgets 9) Tax 10) Reports and Analysis It would be great if this kind of matrix existed to be filled in by reviewers so that others could benefit from their perspectives about the applications and how they address or handle the specific features/functionality. With respect to FinancialForce, the company has found that nearly all the key features it needed were available from the application.
PaySimple has made it next to impossible to become PCI compliant unless we purchased a separate computer for the sole purpose of invoicing. We switched to Chase Bank who does not store sensitive info on our computers allowing us to accept credit cards and still remain PCI compliant. Our money is available much faster by not using the 3rd party. Additionally, a simple company name change required more paperwork than closing the account and setting up a new one even when the same bank account was going to be used. This was the primary reason to shop around. We happily contacted Chase Bank and now save $125 a month and receive access to our funds faster. I cannot believe I stayed with PaySimple as long as I did. It's amazing anyone would jump through the hoops of PCI compliance when the technology exists to keep sensitive information off your small business computers. If this review stops anyone from paying those monthly fees, the time was well worth it! PaySimple, requires business owners to fill out forms that make no sense in laymens terms. Chase Bank fills them all in for you and highlights the areas that need to be signed and initialed. PaySimple, charges excessive fees and in my opinion has very emotional customer service reps. Chase Bank, was eager to help and get things rolling so you can focus on your business. I would never recommend PaySimple.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
PaySimple is awesome for recurring payments. It's easy to set one up and make changes as needed. Without this feature, our business would be dead. Being able to easily set up recurring payments for our retainer is a must and PaySimple does it beautifully.
The payment portal feature is also really good fro collecting payments of differing amounts. We setup a single portal where customers enter the payment amount accessed from a link in the invoice email. This feature has transformed out collections and cut down our time to get paid significantly.
If you do have product type offerings, it's easy to setup individual products or an entire store.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Since SalesForce was not made with accounting in mind, building FinancialForce as a module on top of SalesForce gives problems because the overarching architect of SalesForce cannot facilitate all the accounting requirements.
The FinancialForce integration team was not very good, and did not help us set up our FinancialForce very well. Their customer support is also lacking and takes a long time to respond and troubleshoot our problems.
FinancialForce doesn't actually build financial statement reports. We were only able to run a trial balance, and we had to build the statements ourselves in Excel.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
More proactive and empowering role in merchant fee's and alternative processors. Transparency is challenging in understanding Paysimple's role and relationship to the processors.
Identifying areas for further value to clients.
More targeted small to mid-size business perspective to anticipate growth challenges and prevent blocks on funds for legitimate sales and growth.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Authorize.net and a handful of other merchant processors and gateways. Most payment gateways (online portals to process payments) are rudimentary and not extremely intuitive. PaySimple is not and they are constantly coming up with new ways to improve upon an already very impressive platform.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Because we've got a really awesome rate with them it's definitely a positive ROI. I can't say what that figure is but it's pretty good. Also, our customers have a huge ROI over their prior way of getting payment from their customers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info