Certinia PS Cloud software is a cloud-based services solution that is built on the Force.com platform. It allows companies to manage professional resources, customers, projects and financials in one integrated services management application. Because the solution works natively with Force.com, it utilizes the same data for sales, services and finance on one system.
N/A
Contractor Foreman
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Pricing
Certinia PS Cloud
Contractor Foreman
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia PS Cloud
Contractor Foreman
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Certinia PS Cloud
Contractor Foreman
Features
Certinia PS Cloud
Contractor Foreman
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.3
38 Ratings
5% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
7.533 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.136 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.83 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.43 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
4.75 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
6.0
4 Ratings
23% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
4.63 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
3.84 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
4.51 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.43 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
2 Ratings
5% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
8.6
52 Ratings
10% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.851 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.647 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.643 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
8.542 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Certinia PS Cloud
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
8.3
53 Ratings
9% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing
00 Ratings
5.65 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
00 Ratings
8.632 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
00 Ratings
9.148 Ratings
Photo documentation
00 Ratings
8.752 Ratings
Jobsite reports
00 Ratings
9.144 Ratings
Document sharing
00 Ratings
8.848 Ratings
RFI tools
00 Ratings
9.540 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
00 Ratings
8.844 Ratings
Mobile app
00 Ratings
8.153 Ratings
Submittal design and management
00 Ratings
8.737 Ratings
Checklists
00 Ratings
8.949 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
Specifications
00 Ratings
5.64 Ratings
Change orders
00 Ratings
8.848 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
PSA is great at capturing all the data you would need to accurately track and report on consulting projects. It captures project financials, calculates projected GM%, and (among others) allows for hourly tracking of employees, which breaks it up between billable and non-billable for utilization tracking to accurately understand costs. However, the user interface is tough to learn, and the stability of the data reporting functions is questionable. This tool would be great for smaller consulting shops that fit the standard contracting mold. If your business is fairly straightforward without a lot of shades of gray, you shouldn't have much trouble with the tool. However, if your business practices have a lot of exceptions based on clients, then you'll have a tall administrative task on your hands.
Contractor Foreman has been a great tool for managing a variety of projects, from home remodels to large-scale builds. It works especially well for keeping everything organized in one place, whether it’s estimates, schedules, or job costs. One scenario where it’s been really useful is in managing multiple jobs at once. With several remodels and new construction projects happening at the same time, having a centralized system to track progress, store documents, and communicate with subcontractors has helped keep everything on schedule. It’s also great for estimating—being able to quickly generate and send professional proposals has made bidding much more efficient. It’s especially well-suited for projects that require a lot of moving parts, like tracking permits and compliance documents. For larger jobs, like school construction, it helps ensure that all approvals, budgets, and schedules stay on track without getting lost in a mess of paperwork. Where it’s less ideal is for smaller, one-off jobs where a full project management system might be overkill. If it’s just a quick repair or a simple remodel, sometimes it’s easier to just handle things manually. The mobile app could also be a bit more intuitive for on-site use, especially for field updates and quick changes. Overall, it’s a strong tool for contractors managing multiple projects, budgets, and teams. It keeps things organized and saves time, especially on jobs that require detailed tracking and coordination.
The biggest strength of FinancialForce PSA is that it's built upon the force.com platform, which means it is very easily customizable to our business needs.
Projects are easily created, as well as milestones and assignments.
"Actuals" (dollars and hours) are calculated automatically, and are easily reported on.
Resources are easily managed by using the Resource Planner
Security and sensitive file visibility. Users with no permissions can have access to some hidden files.
Daily log navigation. Users now need to exit one log entirely to view or check another, resulting in a significant waste of time and reduced efficiency.
Customization options for reports. No options to set up and automatically send reports by email to specified users.
There is another PSA software program that we have been looking into (DreamFactory) that could potentially replace FinancialForce PSA in our organization. Like FinancialForce PSA, it is cloud based on the force.com platform. Licensing is slightly less than FinancialForce PSA, and the Resource Management tool is far superior to FinancialForce PSA. With that said, our renewal falls in Q4 2014 and I don't foresee us implementing a new system this fiscal year.
It is maturing and does what it does well although it is not fully complete.
Integration to SF is great.
Gives great visibility to incoming services projects and allows the staffing process to start on pipeline deals.
There are certain processes that take more click-throughs then needed so there are refinement opportunities around the UI.
The resource management screen and project status views have really matured since our original purchase, and while not perfect, allow business leaders to do their jobs.
Configurations vs. customizations. We seem to have to bring in an Apex developer to do a customization for changes I would think could be configuration settings
Overall, Contractor Foreman is a great product, and I’m sure we’ve only scratched the surface of everything it has to offer. It can be a little quirky at times, occasionally displaying a 'Bad Gateway' message, but we haven’t experienced any timeout issues in the past few months. As we continue to use it, I’m confident we’ll uncover even more ways to streamline our workflow
Most of the time it is fine. There are peak periods of usage where performance noticably slows down (i.e., Monday mornings when time is due and many reports are being run)
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
Every time I submit a new help request, whether it's an actual help request or just a question about FinancialForce PSA, I always feel that I'm receiving world class support. The support we receive from FinancialForce PSA is always very detailed and professional. There are some requests that take longer than other for the initial response, which is why I did not give a full 10.
I rarely give anyone a 9 or 10 rating for service. The main reason for this rating is Contractor Foreman's dedication to improvement. To be completely frank, CF has fallen down on their tech help with me several times, but I am an exceptionally difficult user to service as I tend to use a product up to it's limits and want more. CF has actually addressed these wants several times (after waits that seemed interminable, but were actually pretty damn fast in the reality of software development)
Appirio did a good job, however, the user team didn’t know enough to make all the right configuration/customization choices. The team focused too much on replicating existing processes vs. reengineering them. In hindsight we should have had deep dive reviews at key milestones and enforced more focus on how the software would operate. We didn’t have access to true best practices expertise. In hindsight, a consultant from the outside would have been helpful to drive this.
FF PSA is a robust Project Management solution that can be configured to fits any size business. We have tried several other applications and PSA so far has met and exceeded our needs. We run our day to day operations on Salesforce so having a solution that is native was a must have. PSA met that requirement and much more.
There's just no comparing these two. I'm actually going to suggest we keep CE to my boss, and here's why: Clearestimates is perfect for what I just described. You have a little job that you just BOOM it's done? Put it into Clearestimates. That system does not care at all if you did it "properly." Now Contractor Foreman does so. much. more. than CE. It just does. You can do everything on CF (just not anything haha). Most businesses wouldn't need anything else, but since we're still growing, we do some handyman stuff every now and again that CE is perfect for, and we don't have to go through CF's really picky system to make sure every little tiny thing is correct
FinancialForce PSA has helped us improve our data tracking and allows us to get more granular about our financial information and performance.
PSA has given more tools and reports to individual contributors to take greater ownership over their own data, and has increased accountability across the organization.
PSA has added a fairly hefty administrative burden to individuals, project managers, and our financial team.
Prior to using Contractor Foreman we had to wait until the end to capture all change orders in one summary. Now, with the client portal, we can capture in real time and the client has visibility.
We have been trying to reduce administration time in tracking field expenses and with Contractor Foreman our field crew can uplaod reciepts and track expenses right from their mobile phones.
Punchlist - the punch list and To Do features are so robust we have drastically improved getting punchlists and small tasks completed in single trips without the wasted time and travel of multiple trips due to missed/forgotten items.