TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

CGM Aprima EHR vs. Practice Fusion vs. Tebra EHR

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    CGM Aprima EHR

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AN/AN/A

    Practice Fusion

    Score4.8 out of 10
    N/AN/A

    $149

    per month per provider with a required annual commitment

    Tebra EHR

    Score1 out of 10
    N/ATebra (formerly Kareo) provides a full-featured EHR. It is designed to fit the way its users work. Some key features include: Comprehensive Dashboard, Scheduler, Documentation, and Notes.

    $150

    per provider/per month

    Pricing
    CGM Aprima EHRPractice FusionTebra EHR
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    3 signing staff licenses & unlimited non-signing staff licenses
    $149
    per month per provider with a required annual commitment
    Kareo Practice Management (Low Claim Volume)
    $150
    per provider/per month
    Kareo Practice Management (Unlimited Claims)
    $300
    per provider/per month
    Kareo Billing Services
    Contact sales team
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    CGM Aprima EHRPractice FusionTebra EHR
    Free Trial
    NoYesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    CGM Aprima EHRPractice FusionTebra EHR
    Billing and Claims Management
    Comparison of Billing and Claims Management features of CGM Aprima EHR and Practice Fusion and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    CGM Aprima EHR
    8.8
    2 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Practice Fusion
    8.2
    4 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Tebra EHR
    4.0
    5 Ratings
    61% below category average
    Real-time eligibility verification9.02 Ratings10.01 Ratings4.04 Ratings
    Claims management9.02 Ratings10.01 Ratings4.04 Ratings
    Coding9.02 Ratings10.03 Ratings4.05 Ratings
    Patient billing9.02 Ratings10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Financial Reporting8.02 Ratings1.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Patient Scheduling
    Comparison of Patient Scheduling features of CGM Aprima EHR and Practice Fusion and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    CGM Aprima EHR
    9.0
    2 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Practice Fusion
    5.2
    7 Ratings
    39% below category average
    Tebra EHR
    1.0
    4 Ratings
    154% below category average
    Rule-based scheduling9.02 Ratings5.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated appointment reminders9.02 Ratings8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated patient check-in9.02 Ratings5.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-location support9.02 Ratings7.23 Ratings00 Ratings
    Calendar interface00 Ratings1.07 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    Electronic Medical Records
    Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of CGM Aprima EHR and Practice Fusion and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    CGM Aprima EHR
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Practice Fusion
    6.4
    7 Ratings
    12% below category average
    Tebra EHR
    2.2
    5 Ratings
    107% below category average
    Charting / document management9.02 Ratings7.07 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    Templates8.02 Ratings6.06 Ratings2.04 Ratings
    Patient portal9.02 Ratings7.14 Ratings1.05 Ratings
    Mobile/tablet support8.02 Ratings9.94 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fax integration8.02 Ratings10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with other EMR and PM systems8.21 Ratings7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow automation8.02 Ratings1.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Speech recognition7.31 Ratings9.01 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Customization8.02 Ratings1.06 Ratings1.04 Ratings
    E-prescribing9.02 Ratings5.06 Ratings1.03 Ratings
    Medical Security and Privacy
    Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of CGM Aprima EHR and Practice Fusion and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    CGM Aprima EHR
    8.6
    2 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Practice Fusion
    7.2
    7 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Tebra EHR
    8.0
    5 Ratings
    4% below category average
    HIPAA compliance9.02 Ratings5.07 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Role-based permission levels9.02 Ratings4.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data backups and redundancy9.02 Ratings9.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Local mode / networking failsafe7.31 Ratings9.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow and Scale
    Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of CGM Aprima EHR and Practice Fusion and Tebra EHR
    Feature
    CGM Aprima EHR
    8.3
    2 Ratings
    10% above category average
    Practice Fusion
    2.7
    7 Ratings
    94% below category average
    Tebra EHR
    -
    Ratings
    Task tracking8.02 Ratings6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Specialty-specific workflows8.02 Ratings1.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities9.02 Ratings1.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    CGM Aprima EHRPractice FusionTebra EHR
    Small Businesses
    athenaClinicals
    Score10 out of 10
    athenaClinicals
    Score10 out of 10
    athenaClinicals
    Score10 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    CareLogic EHR
    Score10 out of 10
    CareLogic EHR
    Score10 out of 10
    CareLogic EHR
    Score10 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Epic
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Epic
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Epic
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    CGM Aprima EHRPractice FusionTebra EHR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    1.0
    (8 ratings)
    1.0
    (5 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    3.0
    (1 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    CGM Aprima EHRPractice FusionTebra EHR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    CompuGroup Medical
    Aprima is particularly well suited for the primary care provider, however, Aprima has developed excellent content for most specialty care offices as well. Specifically, OB/GYN, Orthopedics and Internal Medicine and its sub-specialties such as Gastroenterology and Cardiology can be easily managed with Aprima. Perhaps Aprima's greatest strength is its organization's commitment to content development. Look for greater and greater things from Aprima!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Practice Fusion
    The best scenario is a small non-profit clinic who needs a great EMR but cannot afford one like EPIC. I might also recommend this to colleagues who are starting a small business because I think PF would be a good, easy, and more affordable to get up and running. I think this EMR makes less sense in the setting of large academic institutions who need lots of easily manipulable data and a huge amount of support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    Kareo is not an appropriate application for any real-world clinical need. It is highly unreliable, crashing frequently, and often becomes frozen. It also cannot ingest data from Therapy Notes, which was a promised feature of the platform according to the sales team. Additionally, when we ran into reliability issues (every day, with every clinician at the practice, across a dozen different office locations with different internet service providers) we were not offered the ability to cancel our contract. Until the reliability issues are fixed Kareo is not well-suited to any use case because it does not work.
    Read full review
    Pros
    CompuGroup Medical
    • Documentation of visit notes
    • Documentation of procedures
    • Tracking of billing (superbills, etc)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Practice Fusion
    • Document storage- You can upload documents and attach them to specific patients. As well as flag documents that need to be signed, and assign them to specific doctors.
    • Charting- Very detailed integration for charting.
    • Reporting- We really enjoy the reports we can pull from within the software.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • Catching missing patient info
    • Catching missing insurance info
    • Providing mailing addresses
    Read full review
    Cons
    CompuGroup Medical
    • The scheduling component could be improved to be more efficient in managing double booked and overlaying appointments.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Practice Fusion
    • Have Physician Assistant as a provider status.
    • Make the notes section of each patients account displays towards the top of page and not the bottom.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • Everything created can always use adjusting depending on the situation
    • Adapting to client needs quicker
    • Problems are not reported in a timely manner
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    CompuGroup Medical
    No answers on this topic
    Practice Fusion
    No answers on this topic
    Tebra
    Kareo was a massive waste of money. It's an unreliable product without promised features and sold by a disingenuous sales team. We will stick to reliable services like Doxy, Therapy Notes, etc.
    Read full review
    Usability
    CompuGroup Medical
    No answers on this topic
    Practice Fusion
    In my opinion and experience, they have a lack of customization so you have to constantly create hacks to make their system work for your practice.
    Read full review
    Tebra
    The user interface is fine but it the app constantly freezes or crashes.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    CompuGroup Medical
    No answers on this topic
    Practice Fusion
    We always get a return call within the time stated. There are many available topics on the forum and it is often easy to find the issue you are seeking more information on. When we have tried the live chat feature we have been satisfied with the timeliness and response.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    CompuGroup Medical
    No comparison. Aprima wins this battle!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Practice Fusion
    NextGen is hard to use as far as medical records. Practice Fusion is user friendly. There is a great knowledge base for questions asked. Practice Fusion takes all the guess work out of the day.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tebra
    I selected Kareo EHR because it was a lot simpler to use and the customer service was definitely better. Every representative I have spoken to has been super friendly and helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    CompuGroup Medical
    • None of which I am aware.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Practice Fusion
    • PRO -- I know now what I need in an EMR/EHR
    • CONS -- They have overcharged me and it has cost me money
    • CONS-- They have disregarded my legal rights which makes me unsure of keeping confidential info in their systems and it will cost me money to switch
    • CONS--They have cost me money with the time I've wasted to follow up on my own tickets that they refuse to follow up with
    Read full review
    Tebra
    • We have negative reviews as we were sold a product that left out some key variables. Things we really needed to make the transition.
    • I don't think KAREO is good for small business (0-10 employees) because their prices for additional or standard features is steep. They charge by the therapist to boot and it is steep!
    • Again ASK questions; do a test run; ask about the migration of your data and its charges.
    • You sign with them you will be locked into a 12 month contract with no out clause. If they are costing you the money you have to stay with them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots