ChartHop vs. SAP Workforce Analytics

Not Suited - The tool is suited for organizations with an employee count of more than >500. There are much cheaper tools out there for a company size of below 500 employees. Integration with other tools can be improved. Suited - From an admin POV who sometimes works closely with HRs, customization and storing information is great.

Incentivized

I have solved numerous business process problems by automating with SAP Workforce Analytics (WF). I have also used the PM module and routemap functionality to automate other general HR processes not tied to performance or compensation planning. For example, I created electronic versions of an employee change form and used the system to route it to approvers.

Incentivized

• The org chart is very easy to use
• It can be integrated into other things like internal company websites
• The UI looks nice

Incentivized

• Performance analysis
• Provides data-driven insights
• Enables [us] to learn about our employees' improvements.

Incentivized

• When org charts or other visualizations get really big, the UI gets very buggy
• Sometimes the platform will randomly lag or will automatically refresh and I will lose progress
• Can sometimes be difficult for new users to learn due to new features that have been added. Lots to try and learn.

Incentivized

• Expensive compared to other analytics tools
• Can be slow to access and refresh often
• Big learning curve for new/junior HR specialists

Incentivized

For teams and people who have enough time to learn the platform or enough patience to read through documentation or to watch through tutorials, the platform is pretty usable and it is relatively easy to pick up new concepts and how to do certain things, specifically around self-service if there is some problem. With that being said, the platform can sometimes be inherently unintuitive with certain edge cases

Incentivized

This is a whole new ball game with Charthop, there was not the options we have on charthop on adp

Incentivized

Incentivized

• This relationship is not as clear
• When comparing this service to others, it may simply be a matter of preference
• This visualization platform is only a way to enables ideas that will increase things like ROI. I don't see it as something that impacts revenue.

Incentivized

• Having a single enterprise-wide HR system has proven to be more effective and more strategically focused than what we had offered to organizations before with a fragmented systems landscape. This allows the organizations to have lower staffing requirements, and to use higher level practices on our transactional environments.
• One of the best ROI points for SAP WF is that you can measure and compare business processes against comparable processes in leading organizations and industry best practices to help identify and implement improvements.
• Finally, some of the individual key factors that helps determine the ROI and TCO are: reduction in cost due to elimination of payroll outsourcing providers, fewer development and test staff needed for application customization and integration, lower annual maintenance and support fees for application software and databases, and reduction or elimination of support fees or mission-critical consulting and professional services.

Incentivized