Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Checkmarx
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Checkmarx, an Israeli headquartered company with US offices, provides a suite of application security software delivered via the Checkmarx Software Security Platform. Individual modules and capabilities include Checkmarx Static Application Security Testing, Checkmarx Software Composition Analysis, Checkmarx Interactive Application Security Testing (CxIAST)N/A
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Veracode provides advanced application security solutions, trusted by enterprises to develop and maintain secure software. Its platform identifies exploitable risks, speeds up vulnerability remediation, and reduces security debt at scale using a proprietary AI-assisted remediation engine.N/A
Zscaler Internet Access
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Zscaler Internet Access™ (ZIA) is a secure web gateway (SWG), delivering cloud native cyberthreat protection and zero trust access to the internet and SaaS apps.N/A
Pricing
CheckmarxVeracodeZscaler Internet Access
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CheckmarxVeracodeZscaler Internet Access
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDeveloper pricing options available
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CheckmarxVeracodeZscaler Internet Access
Considered Multiple Products
Checkmarx
Chose Checkmarx
Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into …
Chose Checkmarx
We actually use Checkmarx along with the other tools. However, the reason we chose Checkmarx is its wide support for languages and useful fix recommendations. The flowcharts help better understand the data flow and give a clear picture of what needs to be fixed and how. Also, …
Veracode
Chose Veracode
Checkmarx for SAST is easier to integrate and use. It also has a nicer and more convenient UI that shows you the source code and the context of the vulnerabilities identified. However, it is more expensive, not on the cloud so you need your own infrastructure, and it doesn't …
Chose Veracode
I used AppScan for dynamic scanning when it was IBM, but it was too clunky and hard to use. Developers and testers needed to spend quite a bit of time configuring scans. I also used Checkmarx for static scanning and it was faster, but it requires you to install on your own …
Chose Veracode
Checkmarx and Veracode have a few common points and some features which are different. Checkmarx UI is more user-friendly, but the level of detailing in Veracode reports is better. Veracode is a good choice for static analysis of code. if the user interface can be made smoother …
Chose Veracode
I found SonarQube to have some decent data for code quality checks but it underperformed for code security.

Snyk is a decent product and strong competitor to Veracode for SCA. Snyk's SAST offering is not as good as Veracode and does not support as many languages.
Chose Veracode
Reduced false positives, developers can identify vulnerabilities at early stage -shift left process. The security labs help developers.
Chose Veracode
Veracode is more thorough and provides a wider variety of tools than the competition. Support is prompt and very eager to make sure we get the help we need as quickly as possible. If Support can't resolve it right away, they will make sure we are connected to one of their …
Chose Veracode
Veracode stands out as the best of breed for all types of AppSec scanners.
Chose Veracode
During the course of our using Veracode, we still do evaluate other platforms to see what they offer, and how they compare to Veracode. I do most of the evaluations myself, and I still come back to Veracode as being the overall best platform. Most every platform, for better …
Chose Veracode
Better all-round with the right balance for features vs cost.
Chose Veracode
Veracode has a very good integration within its products, which makes it easy for a developer. Veracode helps in providing support both actively and through resources on their platform to remediate and fix the issues found in one's application. The reporting section being …
Chose Veracode
Veracode had better pricing than most of them, and much easier deployment (SaaS) so we don't need to worry about hardware. Even with the only cloud option that was not ideal for us, we embraced it. Also, it supports the technology we are using .NET C# and it works great for us.
Chose Veracode
Veracode is a solution easy to set up and integrate with virtually any pipeline--a single product for three solutions.
Zscaler Internet Access

No answer on this topic

Features
CheckmarxVeracodeZscaler Internet Access
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Checkmarx
-
Ratings
Veracode
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
5.0
2 Ratings
56% below category average
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Checkmarx
-
Ratings
Veracode
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
10.0
2 Ratings
10% above category average
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Checkmarx
-
Ratings
Veracode
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
8.4
137 Ratings
8% above category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings00 Ratings8.3137 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings00 Ratings8.1134 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings00 Ratings8.3120 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.3130 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings8.7128 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.5127 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings00 Ratings8.4124 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Product A and Product B
Checkmarx
-
Ratings
Veracode
-
Ratings
Zscaler Internet Access
8.8
160 Ratings
1% above category average
Continuous Verification00 Ratings00 Ratings8.6147 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways00 Ratings00 Ratings8.9142 Ratings
Network Flow Control00 Ratings00 Ratings8.7132 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings8.5133 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging00 Ratings00 Ratings8.0119 Ratings
Admin Access Control00 Ratings00 Ratings9.0141 Ratings
Network Data Encryption00 Ratings00 Ratings8.8129 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping00 Ratings00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CheckmarxVeracodeZscaler Internet Access
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Veracode
Veracode
Score 8.8 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.8 out of 10
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CheckmarxVeracodeZscaler Internet Access
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(5 ratings)
9.0
(136 ratings)
8.9
(183 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(8 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Usability
7.6
(2 ratings)
7.3
(27 ratings)
8.4
(167 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(66 ratings)
8.2
(8 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(1 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CheckmarxVeracodeZscaler Internet Access
Likelihood to Recommend
Checkmarx
If you are going with SAST process or want to improve overall security posture then go for it like integrating it with post deployment steps. If you are more concerned about proactive controls better choose other options such as pee-commit hooks and CI security. Also choose other tools for DAST and API scans.
Read full review
Veracode
Veracode is well suited for development applications that can be made more secure right from the beginning. There is an excellent extension in Visual Studio that scans code from the IDE. However, it is less appropriate or incompatible with scanning SOAP or WSDL APIs. It supports only REST APIs.
Read full review
Zscaler
It's best suited for a distributed remote workforce, securing internet access for users from anywhere. Suitable for highly regulated industries, such as banking and Healthcare. Not a good fit for an organisation where most of its legacy is in an on-premises environment. Bandwidth-intensive industries like media/entertainment firms.
Read full review
Pros
Checkmarx
  • Detects security vulnerabilities in source code with accuracy and detail.
  • Integrates seamlessly with CI/CD pipelines, IDEs, and repositories.
  • Provides clear reports and actionable fix recommendations for developers.
Read full review
Veracode
  • Veracode performs Static Application Security Testing (SAST) very well by finding flaws in the code using entry points so that it tests for everything a user can interact with in the application. This approach is very helpful for avoiding a lot of false positives early on.
  • Veracode performs SCA automatically on every SAST scan, so that we don't have to manually scan the application again for SCA scans.
  • Veracode integrates very well with the ticketing tools, so that it becomes very easy to track every finding and its status within our ticketing tool.
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Single Pane of Glass Management - Everything is very easy to access and monitor the entire environment from an internet security perspective.
  • Install Flexibility - We can and do install Zscaler Internet Access on both our client devices as well as our SD-WAN appliances and servers. This allows us to control internet security even on devices without an agent in our networks.
Read full review
Cons
Checkmarx
  • Scan duration
  • False positives
  • Integration with other tools like Jenkins comes with some inconveniences.
Read full review
Veracode
  • Scan results stability: from one scan to another, additional flaws appear whereas code did not change.
  • Entry points selection: hard to be sure selection is optimal, should be automatized or hidden.
  • Branches management: we currently use sandboxes to scan different branches of our software. Would be good to have real branches management.
Read full review
Zscaler
  • The logs feel kind of lack luster
  • When issues are arising with SSL Inspection, logs show everything working despite end user experience
  • Could use some kind of global find functionality or something that would allow you to search the entire configuration for matching URLs and the like
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
At this time, and we just renewed a month ago, I dont see any products out there overall that can offer what Veracode does. Yes, its not cheap by any means, but for the money its the best application security scanning tool out there.
Read full review
Zscaler
While Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA) delivers critical value in cloud security and RBI compliance, I rate renewal likelihood 7/10 due to evolving needs versus platform limitations. Below is my rationale:
Key Gaps:
1. Advanced Threat Costs:
ZIA’s add-ons (e.g., Advanced DLP, Sandboxing) incur 35%+ cost premiums – straining budgets as transaction volumes (UPI/iMobile) grow 50% YoY.
2. API Banking Scalability:
ZIA’s API rate limits throttle real-time policy sync during UPI peaks (10K+ TPS), forcing workarounds for finacle integrations.
3. RBI Future-Proofing:
Limited native support for upcoming digital rupee (CBDC) security rules requires custom development, increasing compliance overhead.
Read full review
Usability
Checkmarx
Their API based customizations which I leveraged to create an ASPM package, which is developer friendly and can extend above the dashboard features, other ones are UI which is great and feels clutter free. Menu and navigation is also good so as support. Only drawback is sometimes scan takes longer which I feel so can be reduced
Read full review
Veracode
- Almost no setup required and easy to configure - Very easy to use, intuitive UI with integrated analytics and learning portals. - Seamless to review the results, triage them, generate reports. - Security progression of the product/application is tracked via successive scans. - Privileges/Roles nicely fine grained and tightly controlled to let teams "view" only their products.
Read full review
Zscaler
The application is easy to install and configure on all Windows devices. To troubleshoot any internet issue, we can easily collect all the relevant logs from Zscaler and check the exact issue. The only problem is with the uninstall, as a dedicated crew needs to provide the password.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
Veracode has always been up and available to us.
Read full review
Zscaler
No answers on this topic
Performance
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
At this point, it runs well and mostly in a timely fashion. Dynamic scans take days but this may be a config issue still to be resolved.
Read full review
Zscaler
There are often performance issues reported
Read full review
Support Rating
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
Overall, Veracode support is helpful, community support is great, and documentation is available for self-service. Our Customer Success Manager is very helpful and reaches out regularly to see if we need assistance. We have not utilized many of the other resources offered by Veracode, however, in the future we would like to leverage secure coding training for our Development teams.
Read full review
Zscaler
Zscaler's ZIA support is quick and knowledgable. They respond within 1-2 hours of you submitting your ticket. They are very thorough and are typically ready to jump on a live troubleshooting session. Our ZIA platform and how we use is it unique so at times tickets can be open for weeks but we alway get quality support compared to other unrelated product support in our enterprise
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
We use it as a SAS service, so really just getting our teams to mold the use of Veracode into their SDLC has been a process of years in the making. It comes down to what your teams are ready and willing to accept and change. Management is key in getting their groups on board with using it regularly. If it doesnt have management backing, your security teams have little to no influence in getting this process off the ground fully.
Read full review
Zscaler
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Checkmarx
Checkmarx is easier to integrate with development tools and gives quick feedback during coding, which is helpful for developers. Veracode is more focused on scanning and reporting for compliance, but it’s more complex to set up. We chose Checkmarx because it fits better into our development process, offering faster scans and more useful suggestions for fixing problems
Read full review
Veracode
Veracode is slower with scan results however the flaws discovered and sites crawled are almost the same. Rapid7 InsightAppSec only does dynamic scans. Veracode did find more links on a site crawl. Rapid7 InsightAppSec has more out of the box reports than Veracode. Both integration to DevOps tools were striaghtforward.
Read full review
Zscaler
Zscaler Intenet Access outperformed the competition due to its lightning-fast policy delivery and cross-compatibility. It is easy to track employee usage and block unnecessary websites, reducing company internet usage. Zscalar installed on every system increases cloud-based software bandwidth, decreasing user turnaround time and increasing efficiency.
Read full review
Scalability
Checkmarx
No answers on this topic
Veracode
It meets our needs.
Read full review
Zscaler
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Checkmarx
  • Improved ability to provide high level of IA confidence
  • Improved confidence in application-level security
Read full review
Veracode
  • Veracode's platform has had a very positive impact on our security posture, paving the path towards having coverage monitored automatically on hundreds of internal applications throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Veracode's platform has also had a very positive impact on improving the security knowledge of our development team, providing meaningful feedback as well as training options to reduce mitigation time and help to prevent flaws before they are created.
Read full review
Zscaler
  • Has allowed us to remove other products that were suboptimal
  • Saved us money overall by stacking it with other Zscaler products
  • Created a more secure work environment for our users through intelligent internet policies that are not needlessly restrictive while still maintaining security best practices
Read full review
ScreenShots

Veracode Screenshots

Screenshot of a fixScreenshot of the Veracode PlatformScreenshot of SCAScreenshot of SCA Github

Zscaler Internet Access Screenshots

Screenshot of an overview of Zscaler Internet Access (ZIA), a cloud native security service edge (SSE) solution that builds on a decade of secure web gateway leadership. Offered as a scalable SaaS platform through Zscaler's security cloud, it replaces legacy network security solutions, preventing advanced attacks and data loss with a comprehensive zero trust approach. ZIA is integrated into the Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange™ to provide superior defense-in-depth, secure connectivity, end user experience, and administrative visibility and control.