Checkmk vs. Lansweeper
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Checkmk | Score9.1 out of 10 | N/A | Checkmk is a solution for IT Monitoring of servers, applications, networks, cloud infrastructures (public, private, hybrid), containers, storage, databases and environment sensors. It can be deployed under all major Linux distributions or users can run it as Docker container or virtual appliance on other operating systems including Windows. The tool is available as a Raw Edition, which is open-source, and as an Enterprise Edition with a many additional enterprise features. The… | $0 up to 10 systems |
Lansweeper | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Lansweeper helps organizations see, understand, and make confident decisions about their technology estate across IT, OT, IoT, and Cloud. Lansweeper automatically discovers and inventories every asset: hardware, software, and user—then connects that data to insights about usage, lifecycle, and risk. This is to create what the vendor describes as Technology Asset Intelligence (TAI): a trusted foundation of knowledge that turns raw inventory data into clear, actionable… | $2,868 per year (includes 2000 assets) |
| Checkmk | Lansweeper | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | $600 for up to 3,000 Services / around 100 hosts | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Checkmk | Lansweeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 10 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | |
| Checkmk | Lansweeper | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monitoring Tasks |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Management Tasks |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Reporting |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Security |
| ||||||||||||||||
| IT Asset Management |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Checkmk | Lansweeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon CloudWatch Score7.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | LogicMonitor Score8.9 out of 10 | KACE Asset Management Appliance Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | ManageEngine Site24x7 Score10 out of 10 | KACE Systems Management Appliance Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Checkmk | Lansweeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | 10.0 |
| Usability | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 9.9 |
| Implementation Rating | 9.0 | - |
| Checkmk | Lansweeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Lansweeper Screenshots |









