Checkmk vs. ManageEngine Site24x7

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Checkmk
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Checkmk is a solution for IT Monitoring of servers, applications, networks, cloud infrastructures (public, private, hybrid), containers, storage, databases and environment sensors. It can be deployed under all major Linux distributions or users can run it as Docker container or virtual appliance on other operating systems including Windows. The tool is available as a Raw Edition, which is open-source, and as an Enterprise Edition with a many additional enterprise features. The…
$0
up to 10 systems
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Site24x7 from ManageEngine is a full-stack application, website, server, cloud and network monitoring tool. Site24x7 offers code-level diagnostics and customizable error thresholds, end-to-end monitoring with topology visualization tools, and mobile accessibility.
$9
10 monitors
Pricing
CheckmkManageEngine Site24x7
Editions & Modules
Checkmk Free Edition
$0.00
up to 10 systems
Checkmk Raw Edition
$0.00
unlimited & always free
Checkmk Enterprise Edition
starting at $600.00
Starter
$9.00
10 monitors
Pro
$35.00
40 Monitors
Classic
$89.00
100 Monitors
Elite
$225.00
250 Monitors
Enterprise
$449.00
500 Monitors
Enterprise Plus Web
$899.00
2500 Monitors
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CheckmkManageEngine Site24x7
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$600 for up to 3,000 Services / around 100 hosts$1 monitors
Additional DetailsEach Pack will also support additional benefits such as Network interfaces, Applogs, Alert credits etc. You can also, purchase add-ons to create custom pricing options. Please visit the vendor's pricing page, for more information.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CheckmkManageEngine Site24x7
Considered Both Products
Checkmk
Chose Checkmk
As we needed a solution for Linux servers, the Microsoft solution did not fit. Although the agent provided basic information, it crashed frequently, used excessive system resources, and was not flexible enough.
Chose Checkmk
We moved over to Checkmk from Nagios which felt like a natural evolution at the time as the raw version is based on Nagios, I vaguely not having any major issues moving over at the time. We still use the Raw version but we are planning to move to the enterprise version in the …
Chose Checkmk
Checkmk free version is far superior to PRTG free version. For the paid versions PRTG was more efficient and easier to use. Checkmk provides unlimited services on their free version while PRTG is limited. We like to use the free version to avoid monthly or annual costs while …
ManageEngine Site24x7
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Site24x7 [All-in-One Monitoring] has some similarities to ThousandEyes. Especially in the troubleshooting aspect where both offer Web performance waterfall charts to analyze the issue better. Both have cloud-based servers globally that allow to determine performance on the …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Manage engine had OPs manager for alerting and security monitoring alerts, but is just not as robust an offering as [Site24x7 All-in-One Monitoring] (RUM.APM features etc..). Originally we had used Nagios on low, to no-cost linux platform, but Nagios will require license also, …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Initially, it came down to price. But, if you don't mind having a cloud monitoring solution (versus on-prem) then in my opinion Site24x7 is much easier to setup/manage/configure/use than other options I have managed in the past. Adding monitors takes seconds and I spend almost …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
The biggest difference between Site24x7 and products like PRTG, Nagios, or Icinga, is that Site24x7 is hosted off the network, completely externally. The others do a great job on network alerts-- and some can even be configured to send SMS or phone calls with the right …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Each solution excels in their own areas. Site24x7 provides the easiest and most cost-effective transactional monitoring from the previous and existing solutions which we use. However, Solarwinds Orion suite, which includes the virtualization manager, gives us full-stack …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
I haven't had a lot of experience evaluating Datadog but from the research and basic demo that we got I understand that it is significantly more expensive, but it does seem to have more AI features and can assist in predicting when/if applications or essential services may go …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
site24x7 is really unique, I have been using it for many years and always recommend it in my classes. It is ideal for monitoring all web, apps, servers together in one place. Never let a website go down again.
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
I selected this [roduct because I needed something really quick to deploy and that we could easily integrate with our environment without having to deal with firewall setup and other stuff.
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
Simply put, Alertsite from Smartbear is a great product, with top-notch functionality. However, the cost of the platform when using multi-step transactions is incredibly pricey and the cost does not scale well when you want to increase your monitoring. Site24x7 alleviates the …
Chose ManageEngine Site24x7
While Applications Manager and CA CEM can give a deep understanding of the services and applications, neither can compare with the shear speed at which Site24x7 can provide for the web performance of sites and how customer satisfaction is associated as well!!!
Features
CheckmkManageEngine Site24x7
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Checkmk
10.0
Ratings
12% above category average
ManageEngine Site24x7
8.4
Ratings
6% below category average
Network device monitoring10.00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Multiple Server Monitoring10.00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Multi-device monitoring10.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Automated alerts and notifications10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Remote monitoring00 Ratings9.10 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Checkmk
7.0
Ratings
12% below category average
ManageEngine Site24x7
7.4
Ratings
7% below category average
Software and hardware inventory7.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Policy-based automation00 Ratings7.40 Ratings
Reporting
Comparison of Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Checkmk
10.0
Ratings
17% above category average
ManageEngine Site24x7
8.5
Ratings
0% above category average
Data visualization10.00 Ratings8.80 Ratings
Performance data reports00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Customizable reporting00 Ratings8.40 Ratings
Risk analysis00 Ratings8.60 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Checkmk
8.0
Ratings
4% above category average
ManageEngine Site24x7
6.6
Ratings
16% below category average
Data backup and recovery8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Antivirus and malware management00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CheckmkManageEngine Site24x7
Small Businesses
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Score 7.8 out of 10
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Score 7.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
ScienceLogic AI Platform
ScienceLogic AI Platform
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
ScienceLogic AI Platform
ScienceLogic AI Platform
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CheckmkManageEngine Site24x7
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CheckmkManageEngine Site24x7
Likelihood to Recommend
As we have many different applications running on different servers, we appreciate the possibility of writing our own scripts to monitor the different processes and elements. Using scripts of our choice helps us a lot, as we have many different administrators. Thus, we are able to be prepared for upcoming outages or events.
Read full review
I have tried other tools (PRTG etc) in the past, and switched from US monitor to [Site24x7 All-in-One Monitoring], for all the built-in features and ability to implement by using with or without the agents deployed (ip discovery LAN). This is one tool that encompasses the entire organization and allows that single pane of glass feel (NOC screen view) for an accurate virtual snapshot of your entire organization, either cloud and/or LAN.
Read full review
Pros
  • Flexibility using own scripts.
  • Observability
  • Management
Read full review
  • Alerts: Site24x7 can be configured to send alerts in all sorts of ways, from email, to text messages, to even direct automated phone calls.
  • Internal monitoring: An agent installed on one or more machines can monitor internal connectivity to other network devices. This means if connectivity to a server goes down, we often know about it before users alert us.
  • External monitoring: Site24x7 also watched our websites and sends alerts if they're unreachable. It uses multiple locations to do so, which means if there's a partial network outage in some part of the country, we know who is affected.
Read full review
Cons
  • Updates
  • mobile interface
  • Agent for android devices
Read full review
  • I wish the advanced monitors were not so expensive.
  • It is a cloud solution, so it is necessary to open up outbound ports in all security zones.
  • If you lose outbound internet service, all your internal servers will throw alarms and life gets extremely noisy.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Very helpful software and I highly recommend to have on hand as a tool for testing, troubleshooting, and monitoring.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
After knowing the architecture it is very easy to manage the system, rolling out agents and creating new monitoring tasks.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
never contaced support
Read full review
I have only had to use support once, so I can't go into much detail about their support team. The one time I did use it the response was fast but the resolution took some time.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
We moved over to Checkmk from Nagios which felt like a natural evolution at the time as the raw version is based on Nagios, I vaguely not having any major issues moving over at the time. We still use the Raw version but we are planning to move to the enterprise version in the next 6 – 12 months as our needs expand.
Read full review
Site24x7 [All-in-One Monitoring] has some similarities to ThousandEyes. Especially in the troubleshooting aspect where both offer Web performance waterfall charts to analyze the issue better. Both have cloud-based servers globally that allow to determine performance on the Internet. Site24x7 has more features available so we selected it instead.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • avoid downtime
  • Plan updates based on usage of a VM or network switch to avoid impacting users
  • User satisfaction increased due to less visible downtime or issues with our IT infrastructure.
Read full review
  • Positivity wise, we're spending a third of what we were on our website monitoring, this has allowed us to focus funding elsewhere (namely SolarWinds).
  • We have enhanced our core monitoring by now also being able to provide better coverage, whereas we were handicapped with our previous supplier due to the scaling costs of multi-step transactions.
  • The general feeling from our IT staff is that the platform is not great, which obviously reduces confidence in the ability for the platform to provide accurate monitoring data for our websites.
Read full review
ScreenShots

ManageEngine Site24x7 Screenshots

Screenshot of Component wise metric breakdown in a Webpage Speed (Browser) monitorScreenshot of Summary page for a windows server monitorScreenshot of Response time and outages summary for a DNS server monitorScreenshot of Summary page for traces run on a Java applicationScreenshot of Desktop and mobile view of a Website monitorScreenshot of Homepage view