Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) vs. SpiderOak One Backup vs. SugarSync
Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) vs. SpiderOak One Backup vs. SugarSync
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | N/A | Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) provides distributed, resilient, high-performance storage and retrieval of binary large object (blob) data. Object storage is distributed across a cluster of hardware systems, or nodes. The storage cluster is resilient against hard drive failure within a node and against node failure within a cluster. Nodes can be added to or removed from the cluster to adjust cluster capacity as needed. | N/A | |
SpiderOak One Backup | N/A | SpiderOak is a file sync and cloud storage / backup solution, emphasizing privacy. | $6 per month per user | |
SugarSync | N/A | SugarSync is a cloud storage and backup solution designed for small businesses. | $7.50 per month |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | SpiderOak One Backup | SugarSync | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | SpiderOak One Backup | SugarSync |
|---|
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | SpiderOak One Backup | SugarSync | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| File Sharing & Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Security & Administration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cloud Storage Platform |
|
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | SpiderOak One Backup | SugarSync | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | StarWind Virtual SAN Score 9.9 out of 10 | SugarSync Score 4.0 out of 10 | Backblaze B2 Cloud Storage Score 8.6 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | StarWind Virtual SAN Score 9.9 out of 10 | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10 | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Storage Scale Score 9.7 out of 10 | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10 | ![]() Druva Security Cloud Score 9.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | SpiderOak One Backup | SugarSync | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 (5 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (10 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (3 ratings) |
| Usability | 8.0 (1 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (1 ratings) |
| Cisco Cloud Object Storage (COS) | SpiderOak One Backup | SugarSync | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() SpiderOak No answers on this topic | ![]() Ziff Davis Inc
|
| Pros | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() SpiderOak No answers on this topic | ![]() Ziff Davis Inc
|
| Cons | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() SpiderOak No answers on this topic | ![]() Ziff Davis Inc
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() Cisco No answers on this topic | ![]() SpiderOak No answers on this topic | ![]() Ziff Davis Inc
|
| Usability | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() SpiderOak No answers on this topic | ![]() Ziff Davis Inc No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating | ![]() Cisco No answers on this topic | ![]() SpiderOak No answers on this topic | ![]() Ziff Davis Inc
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() SpiderOak No answers on this topic | ![]() Ziff Davis Inc
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() Cisco
| ![]() SpiderOak No answers on this topic | ![]() Ziff Davis Inc
|
| ScreenShots |











