Cisco Meraki MX vs. FatPipe SD-WAN
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cisco Meraki MX | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Cisco Meraki MX Firewalls is a combined UTM and Software-Defined WAN solution. Meraki is managed via the cloud, and provides core firewall services, including site-to-site VPN, plus network monitoring. | $595 per appliance |
FatPipe SD-WAN | Score10 out of 10 | N/A | FatPipe Networks, headquartered in Salt Lake City, offers SD-WAN products designed to provide solutions for an easy migration to Hybrid WAN. FatPipe delivers companies the ability to centrally manage their wide area network, manage branch office configurations, and deploy appliances with the zero-touch installation. A company ca add direct Internet access at a branch to increase available bandwidth. FatPipe's advanced policy management allows cloud destined applications to be routed directly out… | N/A |
| Cisco Meraki MX | FatPipe SD-WAN | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Meraki MX | FatPipe SD-WAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 171 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
96% Delivers good value for the price 160 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
94% Happy with the feature set 167 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
95% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 145 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
95% Implementation went as expected 164 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Cisco Meraki MX | FatPipe SD-WAN | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firewall |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cisco Meraki MX | FatPipe SD-WAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SonicWall NSA Series Score8.4 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Barracuda CloudGen Firewall Score9.6 out of 10 | Cisco Meraki SD-WAN Score8.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software Score9 out of 10 | Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Cisco Meraki MX | FatPipe SD-WAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | - |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.1 | - |
| Usability | 9.2 | - |
| Availability | 9.0 | - |
| Performance | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 8.9 | - |
| In-Person Training | 10.0 | - |
| Online Training | 5.7 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | - |
| Configurability | 9.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | 6.2 | - |
| Product Scalability | 8.9 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | 8.7 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | 9.6 | - |
| Cisco Meraki MX | FatPipe SD-WAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
| No answers on this topic |
| Pros |
| No answers on this topic |
| Cons |
| No answers on this topic |
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Reliability and Availability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Performance |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| In-Person Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Online Training |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
| No answers on this topic |
| Scalability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Return on Investment |
| No answers on this topic |
| ScreenShots |



