TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Cisco Meraki MX

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ACisco Meraki MX Firewalls is a combined UTM and Software-Defined WAN solution. Meraki is managed via the cloud, and provides core firewall services, including site-to-site VPN, plus network monitoring.

    $595

    per appliance

    Pricing
    Cisco Meraki MX
    Editions & Modules
    MX64
    $595
    per appliance
    MX67
    $695
    per appliance
    MX68
    $995
    per appliance
    MX84
    $1,995
    per appliance
    MX100
    $4,995
    per appliance
    MX250
    $9,995
    per appliance
    MX450
    $19,995
    per appliance
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Cisco Meraki MX
    Free Trial
    Yes
    Free/Freemium Version
    No
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    No
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee
    Additional Details—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Cisco Meraki MX
    Considered Both Products
    Cisco
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Quick and easy setup and can focus on growing the business not just building out a single network
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    The MX is useful for small-medium deployments and for easy, non complex deployments. Catalyst SD-WAN is useful for any size and any type of deployments. It is a lot more flexible
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Cisco CVO (MEVO)

    As previously mentioned we needed to manually configure each one which would take 15-20 minutes per device and needed to be done on-site. These devices can also go down more frequently after power outages and other incidents, and we've seen them not come back …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Full Meraki stack guarantees perfect interoperability and reduces integration issues. We migrated from competitor products in the past and interoperability was a constant challenge. Being able to standardize configurations across the deployment is extremely valuable and cost …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    looking forward to trying out Cisco Cloud center and Cisco IQ for the rest of my devices
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Cisco Meraki MX is Easy to use
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Ease of setup and configuration is much simpler than ASA devices
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Fortigate is much more rudimentary compared to Meraki dashboard
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    escalability and easy configuration
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Cisco Meraki MX isn't as compnlicated to manage
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Cisco Meraki MX is easier to configure snd manage
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Main difference is compute / horse power but all the MXs comes with the same feature no matter if we use the smallest appliance or the high end / top of the line model.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    user visibility and tshoot
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Secure firewall provides a more complete featureset but is challenging to adopt and even that product has some weird limitations (like DHCP scope options being global...).

    FortiGate also brings a complete set and e have engineers who are skilled at it. The only thing where …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Is the principal equipment i have
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Cisco Meraki is cheaper that other next gen firewall and having almost every feature which is required.Apart from that it is fully cloud managed and others are such that we need to have console access or access through ssh to do any changes required in network.cost is major …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    In the past, I have worked with Cisco Catalyst 2960 switches as part of more traditional network deployments.

    Compared to that approach, Meraki MX provides a more modern, cloud-managed solution with simplified deployment and centralized control.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    We previously evaluated WatchGuard Firebox Cloud, but we needed a solution that was a bit more straightforward to deploy and manage. The MX met that need for us. However licensing costs for both solutions are still a bit high.
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    Cisco Meraki MX provides simplicity and scalability while cutting costs. With Meraki MX, you get a Security appliance, router, and Firewall in one appliance and managed with one GUI. These features enable the network engineers to maintain large-scale enterprises with a single …
    Incentivized
    Chose Cisco Meraki MX
    The web UI is a game changer between the two products, plus the SD-WAN is much easier to configure and manage.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    171 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    160 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    94%
    Happy with the feature set
    167 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    145 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    164 Answers
    Features
    Cisco Meraki MX
    Firewall
    Comparison of Firewall features of Cisco Meraki MX
    Feature
    Cisco Meraki MX
    7.8
    173 Ratings
    10% below category average
    Identification Technologies7.8167 Ratings
    Visualization Tools8.4162 Ratings
    Content Inspection7.7158 Ratings
    Policy-based Controls7.7160 Ratings
    Active Directory and LDAP7.8132 Ratings
    Firewall Management Console7.7158 Ratings
    Reporting and Logging7.1166 Ratings
    VPN8.6157 Ratings
    High Availability8.5158 Ratings
    Stateful Inspection7.5149 Ratings
    Proxy Server7.188 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Cisco Meraki MX
    Small Businesses
    SonicWall NSA Series
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Barracuda CloudGen Firewall
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Cisco Meraki MX
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (218 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (16 ratings)
    Usability
    9.2
    (13 ratings)
    Availability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Performance
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.9
    (19 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    5.7
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    6.2
    (4 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    8.9
    (184 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    9.6
    (4 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Cisco Meraki MX
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Cisco
    The Meraki MX lineup is well suited for organizations that need centralized management of multiple locations, as it allows for both quick deployment and simple/easy remote administration all from a single pane of glass. It also works very well for providing VPN access for remote workers and helps monitor end-device uptime. It does, however, fall a bit short in its firewall's customization, compared to traditional appliances (like our WatchGuard Firebox), so perhaps less suited for organizations that need more customization, as the Meraki MX lineup is primarily designed for simplicity and straightforward cloud-based management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Cisco
    • The Cisco Meraki MX series is phenomenal at allowing us to remotely manage networks. So the devices usually act as the brain behind our client's networks, which makes it really, really easy for our team to take a look at what's going on in those client network environments, resolve any issues, and make sure that our client's networks are staying secure.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Cisco
    • Layer seven firewall rules. Just making them more granular. We've been in meetings with Cisco SES where I've said feature requests many times and that's one of the big ones where it's just a little cumbersome to implement layer seven rules right now.
    • Just making them more granular. We've been in meetings with Cisco SES where I've said feature requests many times and that's one of the big ones where it's just a little cumbersome to implement layer seven rules right now.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Cisco
    The simplicity and ease of use for the Meraki Dashboard make it an easy choice for our organization to renew our Meraki Enterprise Agreement. We will likely continue using the Meraki MC67-C, MX450, and other MX models in their catalog until we shift away from Meraki completely
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Cisco
    Some features simply aren't there, but the ones that are there are pretty easy to use. Sometimes it is easy to get lost when trying to find the specific device you want to work on, but that's mostly due to how rarely we have to go into the interface.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Cisco
    Meraki MX devices support high availability (HA) configurations, which ensures minimal downtime if one device goes offline. This feature has helped us maintain a stable and reliable network, even in cases of hardware failures. ince Meraki is cloud-managed, we've noticed that the cloud infrastructure is generally highly reliable, with minimal service interruptions or downtime. This makes it easier to manage the network remotely without significant availability concerns. Meraki automatically pushes firmware updates and patches, which helps maintain system stability without requiring manual intervention. These updates are rolled out in a manner that ensures minimal disruption to service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Cisco
    The interface is pretty responsive. The lower end devices are easy to overwhelm if you have a lot of throughput. Be sure the model you get is rated for the amount of traffic you will have. Overbuild if possible, otherwise you won't be fully leveraging the connection from your ISP.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Cisco
    I haven't ever had a bad experience with Meraki support. On the few occasions where I wasn't understanding the UI or needed some clarification about what a setting actually would do, I contacted them and they were very quickly able to provide help. Returns are simple and fast, too. We had to return a defective device one time and they shipped the replacement before we had even un-racked the one that was faulty. Unlike many other vendors, they didn't ask use to a do long list of scripted diagnostics, they just took my word for it that the device was broken and sent out a replacement immediately
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Cisco
    great when they offered it, really tested your knowledge with hands on and see what your peers from other orgs know. glad to see that we were ahead of the curve of what our peers knew
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Cisco
    it was okay as it was moderated but still better than nothing and done via semi self paced webex meeting
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Cisco
    Implementing Meraki MX devices in phases—starting with a pilot group or select branch offices—was invaluable. This allowed us to identify potential configuration issues, troubleshoot problems, and refine our setup before rolling it out company-wide. It also helped to get feedback from early users and adjust the deployment strategy accordingly. The SD-WAN capabilities in Meraki MX were essential for optimizing our WAN traffic and ensuring better application performance across various locations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Cisco
    Cisco CVO (MEVO) As previously mentioned we needed to manually configure each one which would take 15-20 minutes per device and needed to be done on-site. These devices can also go down more frequently after power outages and other incidents, and we've seen them not come back online. These devices are also much larger.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Cisco
    We started only with the Main Meraki MX85 in our enterprise for our main hub, then we started adding remote sites with Meraki MX 68 and connected to our Main hub. Adding more sites and scaling the network is easy, and improving our connectivity saves time and cost to manage, or adding manpower with only 1 dashboard can manage all applications. Scaling and flexibility to change or expand our network are easy thanks to Meraki MX features
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Cisco
    • From a positive impact? Basically it allows us to set up shop very quickly. It allowed us to add sites to our network very quickly. From a negative perspective, I think the only thing is that I can see from a negative perspective is I have a preference to working with ACLI in terms of how I engage with the youth tool At the moment, the only way to actually engage with a tool is on a gui and sometimes what I'd actually like is more detailed information in terms of actual configuration that you'll actually get out of ACLI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots