Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) vs Norton

• lightweight connector
• great integration with other security products
• highly effective
• will also alert for vulnerable software being used on your systems

Read full review

• Norton works quite quickly and is efficient enough to detect threats
• It is very easy and simple to install and is without any complications and irrelevant inquiries.
• Norton is available at a very reasonable price in the market and is not heavy on pocket.

Read full review

• Sometimes during whitelisting, other files from security tools get isolated even if it's not user intended.
• Re-syncing policies also take some time, albeit in a straightforward process.
• As with all security software, false-positives are still detected.
• Hoping that once the library is expanded further, the false positives will be fewer.

Read full review

• Poor performance against Spyware and other threats despite claiming to act against them (recognizes very few and eliminates less) It is limited to viruses.
• Regular blocking of incoming scripts (in front of other antivirus)
• Little or almost no compatibility with the Windows XP Firewall, but they are involved.

Read full review

• HAMP has allowed the team to focus on value added activities instead of constant cleanup of workstations and servers.
• AMP is probably not the most cost effective solution, but is very good at protecting your systems.

Read full review

• It has helped prevent any private company information including banking and accounting information from being obtained by hackers. This helps prevent attacks on our accounts which would cause huge issues for our company.
• It helps keep our computers from crashing due to viruses which would halt any operations on that computer and cause extra hours for our I.T. Department to fix.

Read full review