Cisco Secure Endpoint (formerly Cisco AMP) vs Norton

• Identifies malware, malicious processes/services and other events well
• Great automated actions features such as host isolation
• Detailed threat visibility such as file trajectory
• Integration with other Cisco suite of security products
• Great value
• Low false positive rate
• Lightweight agent
• Variety of reporting
• Stable agent

Read full review

• Norton works quite quickly and is efficient enough to detect threats
• It is very easy and simple to install and is without any complications and irrelevant inquiries.
• Norton is available at a very reasonable price in the market and is not heavy on pocket.

Read full review

• Event search function. The searching is very limited and allows for poor filtering choices.
• Slowness. The web GUI is far slower than most Cisco products.
• Sync issues. When attempting to move a device from one group to another or start isolation on a device, there is a sizable delay in communication with the device that can cause operations to fail.

Read full review

• Poor performance against Spyware and other threats despite claiming to act against them (recognizes very few and eliminates less) It is limited to viruses.
• Regular blocking of incoming scripts (in front of other antivirus)
• Little or almost no compatibility with the Windows XP Firewall, but they are involved.

Read full review

• AMP has been able to catch some serious infections and stop them from doing huge damage in our environment.
• The overall cost of AMP vs the cost of not having this protection and getting hit with malware, or other nefarious damage to your environment is well worth the money.

Read full review

• It allows our tech staff to manage all our devices from one online account.
• It has allowed us to get rid of issues with malware in both detection and removal with minimal lag.
• It protects our customers while making their online purchases and helps them to know that we are a safe company to do business with.

Read full review