Cisco TrustSec vs. ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes vs. Netskope CASB

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco TrustSec
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
N/AN/A
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
ThreatDown (formerly Malwarebytes for Business), combines Malwarebytes' endpoint security capabilities in four bundles. The basic Core tier includes incident response, Next-gen AV, device control, vulnerability assessments, and the ability to block unwanted application.
$345
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Netskope CASB
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Netskope cloud access security broker (CASB) enables the user to identify and manage the use of cloud applications, regardless of whether they are managed or unmanaged, and prevents sensitive data from being exfiltrated from your environment by risky insiders or malicious cybercriminals who have breached your perimeter.N/A
Pricing
Cisco TrustSecThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesNetskope CASB
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Core
$345
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Advanced
$395
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Elite
$495
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
Ultimate
$595
per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco TrustSecThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesNetskope CASB
Free Trial
NoYesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsOptional Add-Ons include server and mobile device protection. Server protection ranges from $129 to $179 per annum depending on service tier. Mobile security is $10 per device, no matter the service tier. A 10% discount is offered for choosing a two-year billing plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco TrustSecThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesNetskope CASB
Considered Multiple Products
Cisco TrustSec

No answer on this topic

ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes, performs so many more functions than simple, traditional anti-virus tools. The cost is less than most others too! The centralized deployment and management console is super-easy to use, yet highly functional. In this day and age, I’m a bit …
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Selected this because it seemed like a good solution. After 2 years of using, I find that the system had not been working for FOUR MONTHS! even though system reported that ALL WAS WELL
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
It's no contest. Cisco AMP, Umbrella and Endpoint use vast amounts of resources and provide little protection when compared with Malwarebytes. One client recently replaced Cisco with MWB and found over 7,300 vulnerabilities on 352 endpoints, including 120 listed as Critical …
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
I think Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection is hands down better from any point of view other than price. Malwarebytes is a little bit more costly than Webroot. However, Malwarebytes detects more threats, protects against more malicious URL's, allows more in customization of …
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
In the past, we've used McAfee, ESET, and Trend Micro. Each of these has their pros and cons, and all are variably priced. They are all overall "good enough" antivirus software, but what makes Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection stand out more is that it's more affordable, it's …
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
We chose Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection after reviewing hundreds of reviews from peers and calculating to cost of ownership and ROI which Malwarebytes handily beat any potential competitors we dealt with. They really worked with us to come up with a plan and a price that …
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Avast and Bitdefender. Malwarebytes works well in the background, with little input require from the user. The software does not seem to slow down the network while it is scanning. The increase in security level justifies the upfront cost of implementing this type of protection.
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
In my experience, Malwarebytes doesn't compete with other endpoint protection products but it complements them for a more effective defense in depth strategy. While it is possible to run Malwarebytes as your only endpoint protection solution, I have found it best to use it in …
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
We have not used any other product consistently. We occasionally have used SuperAntiSpyware as an added scanning too, but do rely on or install it on our machines.
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Forticlient is very good software, but it's more of a anti-virus software. We have used Symantec but it has so many issues, and the list is long.
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
It provides excellent cover in terms of ransomware, and when running various testing tools to see the effectiveness, it scored much more highly than our existing product. It also has excellent recovery options, with the roll back feature. I selected it because of the experience …
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
I stick with Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection because of the simplicity of deploying and managing the product and policies. Most importantly - because it works to defend our network and systems so well that we have had little to no need for intervening on any items. …
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
We used some of the other products as our endpoint protection and they were not up to today's threats. Malwarebytes found threats the others let in from the 1st day we used it. We knew right then we had made the right choice.
Chose ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection is dedicated to protecting against and the remediation of malware. No other product does it better. Their consumer version of the software is often refereed to by other security products and security researchers to clean infected systems. It …
Netskope CASB
Chose Netskope CASB
Basically we tested some of them, as they're direct competitors. Although they offer very similar funcions, all of them claim to be the best and to do it on the most efficient way. At the very end, it just becomes a balance between functions, price and well know product/partner …
Chose Netskope CASB
I find that Netskope CASB provides a larger catalog of SaaS applications and provides additional security controls for each app, allowing granularity to what actions end users can perform on the sites. This goes beyond simple block download/block upload, making it highly …
Chose Netskope CASB
We felt that Netskope provided a more holistic view in the CASB space from a user and usage perspective. In addition, the cost structure for Menlo was a bit higher and was a bit more complicated in the installation and maintenance perspectives
Chose Netskope CASB
We are thinking about moving to PaloAlto Solution of URL filtering and Prisma access as it is in much more locations and it looks to be working more stable for users. SO far this is in the test phase so it is hard to say if we go this path but as we have this solution already …
Chose Netskope CASB
Looked at SkyHigh as well as Cloudlock and felt SkyHigh was the only other leader in the space that was worth serious consideration. Netskope was able to pull out ahead just based on some subjective decisions.
Features
Cisco TrustSecThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesNetskope CASB
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Product A and Product B
Cisco TrustSec
-
Ratings
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
8.7
Ratings
2% above category average
Netskope CASB
-
Ratings
Anti-Exploit Technology00 Ratings8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)00 Ratings9.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Centralized Management00 Ratings9.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Hybrid Deployment Support00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Infection Remediation00 Ratings8.50 Ratings00 Ratings
Vulnerability Management00 Ratings8.60 Ratings00 Ratings
Malware Detection00 Ratings8.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco TrustSecThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesNetskope CASB
Small Businesses
Armor
Armor
Score 6.0 out of 10
ThreatLocker
ThreatLocker
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Druva Security Cloud
Druva Security Cloud
Score 9.4 out of 10
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management
Score 10.0 out of 10
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco TrustSecThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesNetskope CASB
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.8
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco TrustSecThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesNetskope CASB
Likelihood to Recommend
  • Control access to critical enterprise resources by business role, device type, and location, so policy changes can be made without redesigning the network.
  • Easily manage access control and segmentation while maintaining compliance.
  • Create and manage policies in an easy-to-use matrix.
  • Reduce the need for costly network re-architecture by automating firewall rules and access control list (ACL) administration.
Read full review
I would absolutely recommend Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection to a colleague and I have recommended it to many of my peers in the IT world. Malwarebytes is well suited for any environment that requires protection from mal/ransomware which is most companies these days. In particular for companies that host their own big data that the operation of the company relies on. The only place Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection may not be AS appropriate would be one where there is near zero reliance on computers, networks and data.
Read full review
Netskope CASB solution is an easy to use product, providing you and your IT team a great way to monitor, control and manage the traffic. With the product out of the box you can easily close most of the security gaps you can face at the moment... Cloud exfiltration, IA missusing, restricting tenant access...
Read full review
Pros
  • Reduce operational expenses by simplifying network segmentation and defining security groups based on business roles, not IP addresses.
  • Limit the impact of a data breach by quickly isolating and containing threats using technology already in your network.
Read full review
  • The biggest plus with this software is that you can manage all the clients from a management console. You can push the install/updates through it. If the client cannot connect to the management console, then it will update directly from their website. This means you are always up to date and protected.
  • The software on the client machine has very low overhead so it doesn't affect the performance.
  • You can create policies based on the types of users or by the department. You can customize these policies so it will let you micro-manage the clients.
Read full review
  • Monitor or control user activities irrespective accessing via mobile or desktop app
  • User login anomalies
  • Block or limit access for creating cloud instances like Buckets, Clusters, etc
  • Prevent uploading any data to Cloud storage service
Read full review
Cons
  • Help and solutions if needed, support
Read full review
  • poor customer service
  • dashboard says product is working EVEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT!
  • slow response to concerns that should be easy to remedy
  • creates baggage which caused certain computers and the network to run more slowly
  • caused 3 computers on our network top have windows errors and network issues
Read full review
  • Public IP for user can be from different country then it came from
  • Sometimes you can't get anywhere with Netscope ON
  • Location is the key for speed so users complain for speed of 'internet'
  • Some location blocks Netscope IP ranges
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
When I first used the tool in my home systems MANY years ago, I wished for a Business version. I was once at a focus group for a major antivirus company, and one attendee’s feedback to “what could we do better?” was “buy out MalwareBytes and add it to your tool”. I’ve used the Business version since it first became available, and have continued to be a dedicated user through the many iterations and improvements
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
No answers on this topic
It simply works. It doesn't require the hand-holding and monitoring that some other solutions do. It's simple to deploy and maintain, and adding custom content such as Exceptions require minimal effort. I’ve had to add a few exceptions for internal-use, in-house-developed tools, but it’s quite simple to do so within the online interface
Read full review
Netskope's CASB can be challenging to deploy. If it is being implemented for the first time and staff do not have prior experience with deployments, then professional services should be utilized. Once configured and deployed, the product provides an easy-to-navigate User Interface and can be managed effectively with training.
Read full review
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Whenever I've had a query for the support team, they have got back to me very quickly, and given me very well detailed advice on fixing whatever the issue I had was. They also pointed me to help documents and such where I could find more information if I needed
Read full review
There have been some struggles with their infrastructure keeping pace with demand and load. Support can only do so much and has to defer to known problems being escalated.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
I first implemented this more than 10 years ago, when it required an in-site setup with SQL Server (or SQL Express), and even that was pretty easy. With the move to centralized web management some treats ago, it’s become even easier to deploy
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
No answers on this topic
I think Malwarebytes Endpoint Protection is hands down better from any point of view other than price. Malwarebytes is a little bit more costly than Webroot. However, Malwarebytes detects more threats, protects against more malicious URL's, allows more in customization of policies, has better administration GUI, and has better means of implementation.
Read full review
I find that Netskope CASB provides a larger catalog of SaaS applications and provides additional security controls for each app, allowing granularity to what actions end users can perform on the sites. This goes beyond simple block download/block upload, making it highly effective at enforcing the actions outlined in corporate policies.
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • Reduction in IT operational costs
Read full review
  • Other than over billing our company by $6,821.76, our clients are very happy with our approach to network security and malware protection
  • Our service and lack of data breaches (do in part to Malwarebytes) has allowed us to retain our client base for over two decades.
Read full review
  • We can see no large percentage of cloud applications that are being used in the enterprise outside of IT knowledge.
  • We can now have conversations regarding risk, and consolidation of overlapping applications, reducing risk and expense.
  • Allows for IT to assess and mitigate the risk of risky applications or platforms being used and where information may be leaked.
Read full review
ScreenShots