Overall Satisfaction with Netskope CASB
We have decided that all traffic on the user end will be going over Netskope. The idea is great and it works perfectly, it gives you protection for end-users when you need them, the only catch is that your users end up with Netskope IP public address, and many times it is hard to troubleshoot this.
- Monitoring all traffic
- Protecting your end user traffic
- Public IP for user can be from different country then it came from
- Sometimes you can't get anywhere with Netscope ON
- Location is the key for speed so users complain for speed of 'internet'
- Some location blocks Netscope IP ranges
- Protection of end user traffic
- We end up troubleshooting many not existing issues thanks to Netskope.
We are thinking about moving to PaloAlto Solution of URL filtering and Prisma access as it is in much more locations and it looks to be working more stable for users. SO far this is in the test phase so it is hard to say if we go this path but as we have this solution already on all sites it could end up that it will be a cheaper solution for us including implementation.
Do you think Netskope CASB delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Netskope CASB's feature set?
Yes
Did Netskope CASB live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Netskope CASB go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Netskope CASB again?
Yes