Close.io is a customer relationship management (CRM) software with call management and sales workflow automation capabilities.
$19
per month includes 1 user
ServiceMax
Score7.9 out of 10
N/A
ServiceMax’s mission is to help customers with asset-centric field service management software. ServiceMax’s mobile apps and cloud-based software provide an overview of assets to field service teams. By optimizing field service operations, customers across all industries can better manage the complexities of service, support faster growth and run more profitable, outcome-centric businesses.
$100
per month
Pricing
Close CRM
ServiceMax
Editions & Modules
Solo
$9
per month (paid annually) per user
Essentials
$35
per month (paid annually) per user
Growth
$99
per month (paid annually) per user
Scale
$139
per month (paid annually) per user
Subscription
$100.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Close CRM
ServiceMax
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Required
Additional Details
The pricing listed here reflects up to a 35% discount for paying annually. Monthly billing is available at of $19 per user for the Solo plan (only 1 user allowed), $49 per user for the Essentials plan, $109 per user for the Growth plan, and $149 per user for the Scale plan.
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Close CRM
ServiceMax
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Close CRM and ServiceMax
Feature
Close CRM
8.9
8 Ratings
13% above category average
ServiceMax
-
Ratings
Customer data management / contact management
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
7.78 Ratings
00 Ratings
Territory management
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Opportunity management
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
9.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interaction tracking
8.38 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
9.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Close CRM and ServiceMax
Feature
Close CRM
8.5
6 Ratings
10% above category average
ServiceMax
-
Ratings
Case management
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call center management
7.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
Help desk management
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Close CRM and ServiceMax
Feature
Close CRM
9.0
6 Ratings
15% above category average
ServiceMax
-
Ratings
Lead management
8.76 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email marketing
9.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Close CRM and ServiceMax
Feature
Close CRM
7.9
6 Ratings
3% above category average
ServiceMax
-
Ratings
Task management
8.35 Ratings
00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
5.45 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of Close CRM and ServiceMax
Feature
Close CRM
7.5
6 Ratings
2% below category average
ServiceMax
-
Ratings
Forecasting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pipeline visualization
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable reports
4.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Close CRM and ServiceMax
Feature
Close CRM
8.6
8 Ratings
12% above category average
ServiceMax
-
Ratings
Custom fields
10.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom objects
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scripting environment
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
API for custom integration
6.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Close CRM and ServiceMax
Feature
Close CRM
8.0
8 Ratings
5% below category average
ServiceMax
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of Close CRM and ServiceMax
Feature
Close CRM
10.0
1 Ratings
28% above category average
ServiceMax
-
Ratings
Social data
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social engagement
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Close CRM and ServiceMax
Feature
Close CRM
6.4
4 Ratings
16% below category average
ServiceMax
-
Ratings
Marketing automation
6.44 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Close CRM and ServiceMax
Excellent software to increase sales and follow up with existing and new customers. Email and SMS handling are really easy for the sales team, managing leads is really great, and Close merges duplicate leads to help our Data Leads avoid repetitive and unnecessary calls. As mentioned in some comments before, must improve in reports, Close is not appropriate to handle or track agents' hours making it necessary to implement additional software to cover this area.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Small deployments, where you have some specific need for ServiceMax and absolutely need offline capabilities, and are willing to deal with the problems. Otherwise, you may be better off looking at the built-in Work Orders and field service module that Salesforce is now providing. Their app is direct competition for ServiceMax and integrates much better with cases and knowledge articles.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Email sequences. Create and send a sequence of emails until the sequence finishes or the contact replies to your email. You can also pause the sequence manually.
Email sync. Syncs in real time with your email account, which is huge.
Zapier integration. We've automated a lot of our pipeline management through the Zapier integration. This saves us soooo much time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It's my favorite CRM to recommend to sales organizations. Robust Telephony options including a Power Dialer, SMS, and Voice Drop, are completely integrated into the CRM. The kicker is you can have "Unlimited" contacts where many platforms charge based on the number of users. This can make a huge difference in monthly billing.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I haven't really had the need to use their support, but the only time I had an issue with the platform, the Close team was very attentive and responded in a short span of time. Also they take minimal time to solve issues. The only con here is there is no way to reach out to them apart from email.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Pipedrive was great for us for a long time. We used it for over 4 years. Our product and process was simple. When things got more complex, we needed something that could handle our growing needs and Pipedrive kept falling short. We built our own custom solution in Airtable and though it worked, we spend a lot of time managing it. Close was able to solve all our issues and save us hours per week in admin work.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ServiceMax has an offline capability, and also integrates with our Salesforce side of business. At the time, Salesforce did not have a field service application so we could not consider it, but if we could now, we would probably go with that instead. ServiceMax is also expensive. But at the time, ServiceMax was the only offering out there that integrated with Salesforce, had mobile offline capability, and could operate at the scale we needed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ROI for ServiceMax is mostly dependent on how in depth the organization wants the software. Our ROI is expected within the second year of operation due to the complexity of integration and the initial training requirements for in-house programmers.
Inventory control ROI is expected within year three or four due to the number of technicians and creating the foundation of information to import into ServiceMax. Expectations are the front end programming will be complete and our programmers will be better acquainted with the modules and architecture to make the inventory integration smoother than the initial integration.
Our organization has been working with ServiceMax for ten months and beginning to incorporate the financials to the work orders. This process has not been as seamless as once projected and the root causes are under investigation. It appears the original fields available to track time between employees were not in depth nor segregated sufficiently for granularity.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info