Codacy vs. Progress WhatsUp Gold
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Codacy | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request reporting back the impact of every commit or pull request, issues concerning code style, best practices, security, and many others. It monitors changes in code coverage, code duplication and code complexity. Saving developers time in code reviews thus efficiently tackling technical debt. JavaScript, Java, Ruby, Scala, PHP, Python, CoffeeScript and CSS are currently supported. Codacy is static analysis… | $0 |
Progress WhatsUp Gold | Score8.2 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | WhatsUp Gold developed by Ipswitch (acquired by Progress Software May 2019) offers network performance monitoring and mapping. It supports core monitoring features, including automated workflows and network capacity planning, and monitors across hybrid environments. | N/A |
| Codacy | Progress WhatsUp Gold | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | Progress WhatsUp Gold | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
100% Would buy again 5 Answers | 83% Would buy again 5 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | 83% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | |
| Codacy | Progress WhatsUp Gold | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Network Performance Monitoring |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Codacy | Progress WhatsUp Gold | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | Auvik Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | PingPlotter Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Beyond Compare Score9.3 out of 10 | Nmap Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Codacy | Progress WhatsUp Gold | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.2 | 8.3 |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 4.2 |
| Codacy | Progress WhatsUp Gold | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Codacy Screenshots | Progress WhatsUp Gold Screenshots |


















