Cofense LMS vs. Proofpoint Security Awareness Training

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cofense LMS
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Cofense’s Learning Management System™ (LMS) helps raise employees’ cybersecurity awareness and enhances their ability to detect phishing threats. With LMS, the user can zero in on the security and compliance issues that are important to a company. And LMS complements the behavioral conditioning and experiential learning of Cofense's awareness simulation program, Cofense PhishMe™.N/A
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training (formerly ThreatSim from Wombat Security) is a cloud-based training platform that simulates threat scenarios (e.g. phishing) and also provides assessment testing developed by Wombat Technologies, which was acquired by Proofpoint in March 2018.N/A
Pricing
Cofense LMSProofpoint Security Awareness Training
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cofense LMSProofpoint Security Awareness Training
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cofense LMSProofpoint Security Awareness Training
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Cofense LMSProofpoint Security Awareness Training
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Cofense LMS
7.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
-
Ratings
Course authoring6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Course catalog or library6.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Player/Portal6.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Learning content7.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile friendly6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Assignments7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance management7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Learning administration8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Social learning7.62 Ratings00 Ratings
Gamification8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign On (SSO) Enabled Learning7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Cofense LMS
-
Ratings
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
9.0
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Security Awareness Training
Comparison of Security Awareness Training features of Product A and Product B
Cofense LMS
-
Ratings
Proofpoint Security Awareness Training
9.4
1 Ratings
12% above category average
Training Content Library00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Multilingual Training Content00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Training Gamification00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Industry-Specific Security Training00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Individualized Security Training Plans00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Phishing Simulations00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Security Reporting00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cofense LMSProofpoint Security Awareness Training
Small Businesses
Tovuti LMS
Tovuti LMS
Score 9.5 out of 10
Barracuda Security Awareness Training
Barracuda Security Awareness Training
Score 6.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bridge Learning Platform
Bridge Learning Platform
Score 9.9 out of 10
KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training
KnowBe4 Security Awareness Training
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Bridge Learning Platform
Bridge Learning Platform
Score 9.9 out of 10
Hoxhunt
Hoxhunt
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cofense LMSProofpoint Security Awareness Training
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.0
(46 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(5 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(44 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cofense LMSProofpoint Security Awareness Training
Likelihood to Recommend
Cofense
LMS is a more appropriate choice to be used if the organization is large and has multiple verticals where the trainings differ to a great etent from vertical to another vertical. However if the company is a small scale org with limited hierarchy, any open source portal is enough to serve the purpose.
Read full review
Proofpoint
Perfect for regular (monthly) training of staff versus a "one and done" annual assignment on Cyber Security. Allows for a greater number of topics to be covered and for creating a "culture" of security awareness among all Staff throughout the entire company. NOT a replacement for IT Security Certifications amongst your technical staff (CISSPs & GSLCs on staff are a must have). Your Proofpoint Account Rep does most of the heavy lifting, but the program still requires "care and feeding" (resources) within your organization - preparing monthly user lists for training assignments and preparing reports for leadership on participation & progress
Read full review
Pros
Cofense
  • Training modules: developed Using Learning Science Principles
  • Story Based Environment
  • Learn by doing
Read full review
Proofpoint
  • Proofpoint has a huge library of phishing emails to choose from. They add new examples every week.
  • The training modules are fun and interactive and keep the user engaged.
  • The posters, and downloadable materials are amazing and really give a great visual to support your security campaigns.
  • The product is easy to use, and Proofpoint Support Staff are always available to help with any issues you have.
Read full review
Cons
Cofense
  • UI can be more interactive
  • Segregating the users in different groups can be further automated via AD details
  • The end user mobile notification feature should be there rather than only mail.
Read full review
Proofpoint
  • The lack of a user rating on "cyber risk" is proving to be an immense difficulty. As we are looking at how to better hold our employees accountable as well as provide increased learning opportunities for those who need it most, it is becoming cumbersome--especially given the fact this is starting to become the standard for Security Awareness companies. The lack of this is resulting in a manual process vs being able to automate and moderate, thus taking up time and resources, which are always at a scarcity. It can also be cumbersome to look across the tools to see how a particular user is doing, vs being able to view all of their data in one space.
  • If you are a marketer, the editors for the Phishing Templates and Teachable Moments are quite frustrating. They feel out of date and clunky, as well as not featuring an auto-save, so you could lose the templates you are building. At this point, I have actually started to work in other email creation editors and learning HTML, to better customize and then moving all of the code into the editor. It has thus far proven to be less of a headache. I also do not believe the average user is working on branding their program, creating consistency for easy of navigation, and including additional resources in their teachable moments in the way we currently are. However, as more social science backgrounds continue to enter security awareness, I believe this will move towards the norm.
  • Some of the reporting numbers for Simulated Phishing could be better. For example, telling me how many people acknowledged the teachable moment out of the full email campaign is less meaningful than knowing how many people acknowledged it, from those who actually triggered/were shown the teachable moment.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cofense
No answers on this topic
Proofpoint
  • The product is great for what we use it for
  • We have a good relationship with our vendor/Proofpoint, which I believe is needed to be successful in Security Awareness and using tools like this
  • The package/service as a whole is incredibly helpful
  • The integrations with Proofpoint's Trap is one of the most valuable things we could do. It turns your entire email user base into members of IT security, to be on the look out to report cyber attacks, and have them pulled out of everyone's email if the email is condemed/found malicious.
Read full review
Usability
Cofense
No answers on this topic
Proofpoint
Overall, PSAT is integral to what we do. PSAT is a helpful tool to help us improve our employees ability to recognize, report, and respond to phishing. It works for us to use a longterm partner, who is incredibly helpful/supportive, and also bringing Proofpoint's greater cybersecurity & attack intelligence into PSAT. Honestly, we are pretty happy and would make the choice to go with PSAT again (we evaluated the major players in the space via Gartner's Magic Quadrant). The team behind the products are excellent and the product of itself is both intuitive and expansive. This combination allows us to reach our 10k+ employees who are located in over 20 countries
Read full review
Support Rating
Cofense
No answers on this topic
Proofpoint
Proofpoint support has always been above average. A lot of companies provide a customer service manager for your account but few have proved as connected as Proofpoint. The CSM was able to give us a good start with the product and checked in periodically. I found them always helpful with any questions and very knowledgeable about the platform.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cofense
Cofense LMS works well at our environment due to it well know security awareness training without any complications. Ease to get support documentations & end users feedback. While in MetaCompliance Support & documentation was not that easy for end users.
Read full review
Proofpoint
All three products have the pros and cons. Since we use other Proofpoint products, TAP, TRAP, etc. the integration with PSAT is much better. The other products do not integrate with TRAP nearly as well as PSAT.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cofense
  • Trainings made user more aware of the security attacks they are vulnerable to
  • Strengthened the overall security posture of the company
  • Detterent control as incase the the personnel are not able to finish off their training, it is followed by HR action.
Read full review
Proofpoint
  • I don't have any tangible numbers to provide, but we definitely have an increase in the number of staff reporting suspicious emails and fewer people clicking on phishing emails.
  • The cost we are paying per employee (<$2 pp)is low enough that we can consider this a "benefit" we offer to our employees. The knowledge gained can also be applied to your personal life with similar threats.
Read full review
ScreenShots