Compeat, with Ctuit Radar vs. PRO Unlimited Wand VMS

Compeat is very well suited for large, sit down dining restaurants and can be too much for smaller scale establishments.

Incentivized

When working with a VMS or MSP I must say PRO is one of the best to use. You are able to manage multiple clients within the same portal, very user-friendly, able to go to one location for all recruitment needs, management needs, sales and accounting needs. It helps organize recruitment needs and make sure that candidates are within budget. With this program, I do not have to worry about aging reports or outstanding invoices

Incentivized

• It is a reliable accounting system, I like the fact that all transactions are recorded and not possible to change it after it is posted.
• Inventory is very useful and you can scan items to help with the counting.
• DSR are pulled automatically from our POS System
• Bank Reconciliation is pretty easily be done and the bank extract can be imported into the system, Compeat matches transaction automatically.

Incentivized

• As compared to other VMSs out there, Wand does allow for more information to be entered. In particular, I don't like when there are little to no free-form fields in a VMS, as you cannot truly explain a candidate's experiences without free-form entry.
• Notifications actually explain what is happening. Some VMSs send notifications that require you to login to see the activity. It's nice to see the info come directly to me in an email.

Incentivized

• Reporting Reporting Reporting
• Customer Service
• Lack of AUTO IMPORT FEATURE TO ACCOUNTING SOFTWARE

• It would be helpful in the beginning to see if the opportunity is exempt or non-exempt
• The timing out of session could be extended a few more minutes longer
• When adding a candidates email
• Easier way to update a candidates profile and updated resume

Incentivized

Much better and more willing to "build" a product that works for our company.

Incentivized

Again, I didn't specifically select the Wand system; our client selected it, and I work with it. However, I have used several VMSs as well, so I feel as though I can compare from a user perspective. Wand isn't great - I prefer Fieldglass for sure, mostly for it's simplicity. IQNavigator, Beeline, and PeopleFluent are all similar to Wand in that they tend to be over-complicated, with a lot of steps involved in the submittal process that aren't relevant to the hiring process. And none are all that intuitive. However, in my experience, the people at PRO are top-notch, and more helpful than almost any others from other VMSs with whom I have worked. I'm not sure if that is strictly a function of the client environment, or PRO itself, but it's worth remarking on.

Incentivized

• It helps us keep our costs manageable, we can keep our theoretical costs within 1% of our actual costs.
• Creating shopping lists and par levels makes purchasing less daunting and saves hours in time.

Incentivized

• Saves time on all aspects of organization
• Only negative is that there is not a real connection with the managers from a Recruitment or Sales point of view - but understand they are prob bombarded by sales calls
• Very helpful tool to keep process and procedures in place

Incentivized