Condens vs. Lyssna

Condens

Condens

5 Reviews and Ratings

Lyssna

Lyssna

16 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Condens	Score 8.8 out of 10	N/A	Condens helps users and their teams to store, structure, and analyze user research data and share findings across an organization. Condens helps turn raw data to findings, simplify time consuming tasks, and bring structure to testing processes while maintaining a flexible workflow.	$15 per month
Lyssna	Score 7.7 out of 10	N/A	Lyssna (formerly UsabilityHub) is a user research platform used to test digital products with real users and gain insights into their audience. Its tools and features help Lyssna to optimize users' designs and create more engaging user-friendly experiences. Lyssna is a research platform, offering a broad range of testing features including: Five Second Testing - Used to quickly test the effectiveness of landing pages, messaging and designs by showing users a…	$0 per month (3 seats included)

Pricing

Condens

Lyssna

Editions & Modules

Individual: $15
per month one researcher and 12 hours per month of automated transcription
Team: $190
per month 3 researchers and 50 hours per month of automated transcription
Business: $450
per month includes 5 researchers and unlisted automated transcriptions
Enterprise: $1,200
per month includes 10 researchers, unlisted transcriptions, and custom terms

Free: $0
3 seats included
Starter: $99
per month 5 seats included
Growth: $199
per month 15 seats included
Enterprise: Contact Sales
custom seats

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Condens	Lyssna
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	No

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

Discount available for annual plan. Panel responses are priced seperately.

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Condens	Lyssna

Best Alternatives
	Condens	Lyssna
Small Businesses	Smartlook Score 8.5 out of 10	Smartlook Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Optimal Score 9.1 out of 10	Optimal Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises	Optimal Score 9.1 out of 10	Optimal Score 9.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Condens	Lyssna
Likelihood to Recommend	- (0 ratings)	8.0 (5 ratings)
Usability	- (0 ratings)	7.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Condens	Lyssna
Likelihood to Recommend	Condens Insights No answers on this topic	Lyssna UsabilityHub is well suited for remote unmoderated testing. Responses are captured very quickly and live updates allow the user to keep track of how the test is performing. The types of testing that make the most sense to use on UsabilityHub are preference test, first click test, navigational, and design surveys. It is less appropriate for one-on-one testing and lengthy questionnaires. Incentivized Calvin Pedzai Senior UX Designer Read full review
Pros	Condens Insights No answers on this topic	Lyssna Rapid user feedback Demographic targeting Well presented results Easy to use Relatively inexpensive Incentivized Lee Preston Conversion Rate Optimisation Consultant Read full review
Cons	Condens Insights No answers on this topic	Lyssna Add additional demographic sorting options for the audience to better meet the needs of B2B users - for example include industry type, functional area, etc. Bring back the navigation test type Add additional test types Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Usability	Condens Insights No answers on this topic	Lyssna Due to its simplicity and design it is really easy to navigate. You can clearly understand which sections you have completed and which are still left to be done. It is also really easy to change ordering of content etc, which I have found hasn’t been an option in other tools which means it is a really lengthy task of rewriting all of the tasks or questions to get them in the correct order that is desired. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Condens Insights No answers on this topic	Lyssna UsabilityHub provides very fast, short responses to specific questions about a static image of a website. This is useful for checking what is most prominent on a page, what they would click on, what they see/read within the first 5 seconds of landing etc. WhatUsersDo is a broader tool, that records the screen and audio as a user navigates the website. You can set tasks and ask questions, but it much more about the user journey experience and their opinion, rather than testing a particular feature. Feedback also takes a bit longer. Hotjar is a combination of both, its a screen recording which helps you to see where users click and move to, but there is no audio or text feedback, just heatmaps/click maps for watching user behaviour. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review
Return on Investment	Condens Insights No answers on this topic	Lyssna Increase in testing frequency per quarter. Increase in approved projects for developments. Few reverts per project. Incentivized Calvin Pedzai Senior UX Designer Read full review
ScreenShots		Lyssna Screenshots