TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Conga Advantage CPQ

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Conga

Connect with Conga

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Conga so that Conga and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Conga Advantage CPQ

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AConga CPQ empowers sales, partners, and customers to efficiently configure complex products and services offerings, and provide personalized prices and quotes, utilizing codified product and pricing information - to drive higher win rates and a more pleasurable buying experience. Conga CPQ also helps to maintain a single price book, discounting structure, and quoting structure across all channels. With an API-first approach, configuration, pricing, or quoting…

    $35

    per month per user

    Revit

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AAutodesk’s Revit is a Building Information Modelling (BIM) tool. It enables architectural, MEP, structural, and engineering design, and provides analysis to support iterative workflows

    $350

    per month

    Pricing
    Conga Advantage CPQRevit
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Monthly
    $350
    per month
    1-Year
    $2805
    per year
    3-Year
    $8415
    per 3 years
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Conga Advantage CPQRevit
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details—Pricing available for monthly, annual, or 3-year subscriptions. Longer subscriptions offer greater discounts.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Conga Advantage CPQRevit
    Considered Both Products
    Conga
    No answer on this topic
    Autodesk
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    94%
    Would buy again
    47 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    28 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    44 Answers
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    25 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    46 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    28 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    73%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    24 Answers
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    17 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    77%
    Implementation went as expected
    27 Answers
    89%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    Features
    Conga Advantage CPQRevit
    CPQ
    Comparison of CPQ features of Conga Advantage CPQ and Revit
    Feature
    Conga Advantage CPQ
    8.6
    65 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Revit
    -
    Ratings
    Quote sharing/sending8.860 Ratings00 Ratings
    Product configuration9.260 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configuration options8.960 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pricing rules8.760 Ratings00 Ratings
    Price adjustment9.161 Ratings00 Ratings
    Purchase history and open contracts7.849 Ratings00 Ratings
    Guided selling/Sales portal8.746 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ reporting & analytics7.154 Ratings00 Ratings
    CPQ-CRM integration8.657 Ratings00 Ratings
    Attachments to quotes8.955 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order capturing8.931 Ratings00 Ratings
    Human Resource Management
    Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Conga Advantage CPQ and Revit
    Feature
    Conga Advantage CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Revit
    7.2
    6 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Employee demographic data00 Ratings8.05 Ratings
    Employment history00 Ratings6.74 Ratings
    Job profiles and administration00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
    Organizational charting00 Ratings6.54 Ratings
    Organization and location management00 Ratings6.95 Ratings
    Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)00 Ratings6.13 Ratings
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of Conga Advantage CPQ and Revit
    Feature
    Conga Advantage CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Revit
    7.2
    4 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Pay calculation00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
    Support for external payroll vendors00 Ratings6.64 Ratings
    Off-cycle/On-Demand payment00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
    Benefit plan administration00 Ratings7.14 Ratings
    Direct deposit files00 Ratings7.14 Ratings
    Salary revision and increment management00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
    Reimbursement management00 Ratings7.63 Ratings
    Asset Management
    Comparison of Asset Management features of Conga Advantage CPQ and Revit
    Feature
    Conga Advantage CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Revit
    6.6
    4 Ratings
    3% below category average
    Tracking of all physical assets00 Ratings6.64 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Conga Advantage CPQ and Revit
    Feature
    Conga Advantage CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Revit
    5.8
    11 Ratings
    28% below category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings4.46 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings3.38 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings8.18 Ratings
    Data exportability00 Ratings7.411 Ratings
    Construction Project & Field Management
    Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Conga Advantage CPQ and Revit
    Feature
    Conga Advantage CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Revit
    7.5
    53 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Plan distribution & viewing00 Ratings7.951 Ratings
    Plan markups & sharing00 Ratings8.344 Ratings
    Issue tracking & punchlists00 Ratings7.032 Ratings
    Photo documentation00 Ratings9.021 Ratings
    Jobsite reports00 Ratings8.418 Ratings
    Document sharing00 Ratings7.646 Ratings
    RFI tools00 Ratings6.625 Ratings
    Collaboration & approvals00 Ratings8.742 Ratings
    As-built drawings00 Ratings8.750 Ratings
    Mobile app00 Ratings5.017 Ratings
    Submittal design and management00 Ratings7.422 Ratings
    Checklists00 Ratings7.49 Ratings
    Meeting Minutes00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Specifications00 Ratings6.514 Ratings
    Change orders00 Ratings6.59 Ratings
    Estimating
    Comparison of Estimating features of Conga Advantage CPQ and Revit
    Feature
    Conga Advantage CPQ
    -
    Ratings
    Revit
    8.3
    37 Ratings
    9% above category average
    Takeoff tools00 Ratings8.737 Ratings
    Job costing00 Ratings7.828 Ratings
    Cost databases00 Ratings8.021 Ratings
    Cost calculator00 Ratings8.122 Ratings
    Bid creation00 Ratings9.016 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Conga Advantage CPQRevit
    Small Businesses
    QuoteWerks
    Score9.8 out of 10
    CMiC Construction Platform
    Score7.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    QuoteWerks
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Autodesk Build
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Agentforce Revenue Management
    Score8.6 out of 10
    InEight
    Score7.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Conga Advantage CPQRevit
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (82 ratings)
    9.0
    (55 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.8
    (10 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (3 ratings)
    7.7
    (8 ratings)
    Availability
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.0
    (4 ratings)
    7.0
    (8 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    1.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Conga Advantage CPQRevit
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Conga
    It is well suited to providing quick pricing recommendations, allowing those who are quoting to get our agreements out efficiently. Where I find there may be some limitations is around the details that it uses to establish recommendations and the overrides. For example it would be nice to have a way to set overrides for those criteria like length of agreement, etc. and have it apply across the board
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Revit is very well suited to creating designs and construction documents for standard buildings. Buildings that need to utilize phasing in their construction process are also well suited to this software. Revit is not as well suited to buildings that have irregular shapes or components that need to be highly detailed.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Conga
    • The perceived power strength is that it is supposed to contain CPQ, Contract Management, Document generation and template manipulation, and cash/invoice process all in one wrapped package.
    • It was developed on the Force.com platform.
    • They provide multiple releases of their product per year.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    • Revit allows users to create real buildings and is very much rooted in making functional buildings.
    • Revit allows users to collaborate both within their own firms and with other types of firms as well. This is particularly useful for coordinating buildings between architecture and engineering firms.
    • Revit integrates fairly well with other programs such as AutoCAD and Sketchup. This allows us to bring in elements modeled in other programs into our revit models.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Conga
    • Our number one complaint with Conga CPQ has been speed. In my experience, Conga CPQ is extremely slow, especially for large orders.
    • In my opinion, the configuration methods of Conga CPQ are outdated and error-prone. One literally puts configurations into string-based custom settings, including the API field names. This often leads to deployment issues and run-time configuration errors.
    • In my experience, Conga CPQ is everything but simple to develop. You need things like a 12-step pricing callback to support custom pricing.
    • In my experience, Conga CPQ support is not responsive.
    • When it comes time to lock in a renewal contract for Conga CPQ, in my experience, they delay engagement, so you are truly behind the 8 ball when it comes time to decide if you are going to continue with Conga CPQ.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    • Versioning - Revit is not backwards compatible. This creates issues if you are working with people who are using older versions as you cannot save to a previous version. I understand why this is and I do not see this ever changing, however, Its very annoying.
    • Autodesk - They are the 800 pound gorilla in the industry. The lack of competition inhibits development and it seems Autodesk has put more effort into its BIM 360 platform and Revit development has suffered because of it. I would like to see better competition so Autodesk would step up its game.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Conga
    The rating is based on several things: 1) Ongoing support requirements being able to be addressed by cross training existing Salesforce administrators 2) Apttus superior corporate vision for the quote to cash space 3) Apttus execution of the corporate vision with automated agents (Max), and Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning offerings to leverage the investment in Configure Price Quote 4) Apttus corporate health and investment in the product line
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    We will almost certainly be renewing all of our current seats of Revit and will likely be adding seats as we look to get more and more of our staff trained and using Revit. The software is starting to become the standard for our projects as we move forward as more and more of our clients are requesting or accepting use of it
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Conga
    Conga CPQ is a great tool but lacks good support and [a] very limited knowledge base which doesn't include day to day errors which users face, thus leading us to support and take more time in turn. Also cart performance can be improved drastically which will enhance the user experience as the user doesn't have to wait for the pricing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    It is a professional environment, but far from easy and overly complex in many places. The system is often too deep in settings and overrides (see Visibility/Graphics in combination with linked files, filters, color overrides and view templates). I don't really like the dialog-in-dialog interface and its spartan looks. But it works well overall if you know what you are doing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Conga
    I have not heard of any issue
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Revit seems to always be available when I need it. I have not experiences an outage. There are occasions where we need our internal IT department to trouble shoot a file on our Revit dedicated server and that sometimes causes a delay however that is not a software access issue
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Conga
    No answers on this topic
    Autodesk
    Revit is a fairly graphics heavy piece of software. It is powerful in its capabilities but as a result it takes a lot of the graphics card, the memory, etc. For all that it can do and the specs of my computer I find it pretty good from a performance standpoint
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Conga
    Tier1/tier 2 support can only handle native functionality. Customizations have to be escalated to developers which aren’t included in the support program.

    I go ahead and copy the people I directly worked with on implementation for assistance. I would rate them an 8 for support assistance.
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Autodesk has always had a good support system in place. There is a massive user base for Revit, and there are thousands of forum threads and other discussions online about any and every problem that you could ever run into. For being such a large program with so many different options, there aren't many roadblocks or pitfalls that users can fall into.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Conga
    No answers on this topic
    Autodesk
    The training was Revit Essentials and it was very beneficial. I would say that it is best to get the training right before you know you will be using Revit as learning the basis then applying what you learned immediately is the most effective and best value for your money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Conga
    We attended 5 hours worth of webinars early on.

    We had to understand how objects worked to figure out how to structure our data.

    I would have liked more in-depth training but it would have been an additional cost
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    The online training is hit or miss. I feel that its better to be live to be able to pace and ask questions to a live person as you are learning hwo to do things. Its not natural to learn Revit especially if you know AutoCAD so my suggestion is the live training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Conga
    Be iterative. Take the opportunity to build a catalog based on how Apttus works well. Learn the tool yourself or use an SI. Take the time to build a configuration / pricing migration tool with X-Author for Excel or roll your own. Stick with OOTB Apttus as any customization will cost you every time a new version is released
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Implementing Revit as your main drafting software (i.e. moving to BIM from CAD) may be a tough decision if you have learned drafting. It is a different way to approach and think about developing a project. However, if you are able to adapt to a new way of thinking and get used to it by working through a few projects than it is as efficient as CAD in most areas in general and will also be both better/worse in some areas
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Conga
    We selected Apttus CPQ over SteelBrick due to the simplicity of SteelBrick's out of the box pricing and ability to customize quoted products. As a global organization with selling a highly configurable products, we felt the ability of Apttus to handle our requirements as standard functionalty rather than a customization was a material difference between the platforms.
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    Revit is used primarily for creation of contract documents and documents that need to be used to build in the field. Sketch Up is great for a quick concept sketch, but lacks the details that Revit has which are needed to construct. AutoCAD is a great tool for details as well, but does not have as many building capabilities as Revit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Conga
    No answers on this topic
    Autodesk
    While I am not directly involved with the deployment of Revit, it seems that our internal IT department has appreciated the ability to increase or decrease the number of seats. I have never had an issue with the deployment if and when needed, especially regarding the availability of a set
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Conga
    • The ability to generate engineered configurations that is right by construction has reduced the cycle time of the customer engagement. The fact that we are able to guide the process and end up with a validated bill of material reduces the iterations with the customers.
    • As long as the validations rules are correct the generated bill of material is accurate. We are now looking at using Apttus to perform quality checks in our product rules since the tool is able to test different configurations quickly and efficiently.
    • Configuration that use to take weeks and consumed valuable engineering resources has been transformed to become a customer facing application that is simple enough for customer to self-service.
    Read full review
    Autodesk
    • Though implementation of Revit is usually front heavy which means a lot of effort is put in at the front end of the project, the return of investment towards the remainder of the project is really good. All the effort in decisions made at the beginning of the project pays off with Revit incorporating all the building information in the model so the team can glean from this throughout the life of the project is a major plus.
    • A major negative is the many false assumptions that comes with using Revit on a project. Just like any other computer application, Revit is only a tool. It's only as good as the operators who implement this tool. Revit is not a cureall for fixing all the problems that still can come out throughout the life of a design & construction project.
    • A major positive for our office involving the use of Revit is the ability for our staff from multiple offices to work on the same project central file. We don't need to maintain an expensive server. With the addition of Collaboration for Revit the entire project can be stored in the cloud for our staff to access and complete the project faster than ever.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Conga Advantage CPQ Screenshots

    Screenshot of the Product's Capabilities. It can validate any combination of rules & constraints with an unlimited number of configuration attributes​.Screenshot of the interface to model & deploy any pricing structure or strategy​ - pricing intelligence & discounting rules​ and profitability insights ​& margin visibility​.Screenshot of the interface for product & pricing configurations​, for simple and complex products.Screenshot of the quoting interface.