CONTENTdm vs Nuxeo

• Constant URLs
• User interface is good
• Run by OCLC, not likely to disappear

Read full review

• The platform has Lots of option to protect assets, review and share with the required people.
• It provides a seamless transition from SharePoint which is extremely useful for our business as we have tons of data stored on SharePoint.
• It is a powerful tool, especially for searching - since the indexing is super fast unlike other platforms.

Read full review

• As a digital asset management system, one would expect the capability of managing preservation, which CONTENTdm lacks.
• Lack of batch updating and other advanced metadata management capabilities.
• The usage statistics does not work, and the company is not planning to fix it, at least based the interaction with tech support staff. Customers were referred to use Google Analytics.

Read full review

• During a software update - if one issue is fixed, others are broken. Proper regression testing is required.
• Customization is bit difficult in as documentation is not as powerful. This area could be improved.
• It has to enable bulk uploading of documents, it requires Nuxeo support assistance for this feature and this is a paid service.

Read full review

• It helped us to get started with our digital collections projects at a relatively low cost.
• As our needs grew, it became apparent that we needed something more powerful, and that provides better workflows and better statistics and is able to handle the whole life cycle of digitation projects.

Read full review

• It is an open source tool hence proves to be an excellent ROI. Content and document management are managed very well in the tool.
• Security and role based features play a major role. Migration is a breeze. Hence it is a very positive impact.
• Nuxeo has very rich feature set but its complex enough and so developers needs considerable time to ramp up on development on this platform .

Read full review