Coosto vs Kompyte

• Quick, easy to use SQL based search functionality.
• Simple interface with useful predesigned measures.

Read full review

• Social/Blog Monitoring: We can see how many social/blog posts our competitors are making, how many engagements (likes, shares, etc) they receive, and what their engagement rate is.
• Competitor Page Monitoring: We are able to see before and after pictures of web pages after our competitors them. This feature enables us to quickly and easily see competitor's changes in copy, creative and pricing.
• Benchmarking: Kompyte benchmarks us against our competitors for effectiveness in SEO and paid ads.

Read full review

• The dashboard is only useable in full screen, not in compartments
• Rather expensive

Read full review

• Kompyte has a tool that is supposed to track ads after specific keywords are bid on by competitors; however, competing platforms offer greater visibility and analytics for this function.
• The Notebook function in the tool is meant to be a repository for notes and mentions across the organization; however, it doesn't seem to be automatically updated and it requires a lot of manual processes to function.
• The SEO analysis is reliant on keywords that we provide - the tool would be much more valuable if it pulled in raw organic data outside of what we are specifically targeting or tracking.

Read full review

• Positive impact on communications strategies.
• Negative impact as product is often used for collecting metrics. Most of Coosto's metrics shouldn't be used for strategic or design decisions.

Read full review

• Kompyte has helped save time by automatically streamlining the process of monitoring updates our competitors make across their pages.
• The tool offers broad insights that are valuable to multiple teams across the organization.
• Pricing is based on licenses and the volume/breadth of scans you want the tool to make - you pay for what you need.

Read full review