Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Copper Project
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
Copper Project, from Australian company Element Software, is project management software.N/A
Planview Portfolios
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Planview Portfolios is an end-to-end project portfolio management and enterprise architecture management tool. It includes two components: Portfolio and Resource Management and Capability and Technology Management. The platform is available as a cloud-based or on-premise service.N/A
Projector PSA
Score 1.1 out of 10
N/A
Projector's cloud-based Professional Services Automation (PSA) software helps project-based services organizations track time and expenses, invoice clients, schedule resources, and manage projects. Its three modules span a more comprehensive set of uses than typical project management software. The Accounting module helps the user track time and expenses and manage invoices and billing. Also it syncs with the company's accounting systems as a sub-ledger. The Resource Scheduling module matches…
$15
per user
Pricing
Copper ProjectPlanview PortfoliosProjector PSA
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Team Edition
$15
per user
Professional Edition
$25
per user
Enterprise Edition
$30
per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Copper ProjectPlanview PortfoliosProjector PSA
Free Trial
NoNoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Copper ProjectPlanview PortfoliosProjector PSA
Considered Multiple Products
Copper Project
Chose Copper Project
Integration of the Copper Project is amazing. It is designed on such a great module that it can easily integrate with any other software. I have a lot of software already in my organization which we are using to handle different processes in the organization, Copper Project …
Planview Portfolios
Chose Planview Portfolios
Workfront is better for operational work, but it lacks the automation that Planview has.
Chose Planview Portfolios
Planview Portfolios help with aggregate financials forecast and budget
Chose Planview Portfolios
The functionality is there, but the Workfront UI is much more progressive and User Friendly.
Chose Planview Portfolios
It connects strategy back to delivery. it can handle multiple delivery methodologies
Chose Planview Portfolios
Jira, serves a different purpose hence, has a lot of additional features.
Chose Planview Portfolios
Planview and Microsoft Project have many similar features. However, the direct contact with the Planview team for questions, tech support, and training is unprecedented and appreciated.
Microsoft Project:
-Weaknesses: Limited to single project management, lacks risk and time …
Chose Planview Portfolios
We use Planview Portfolios for 10+ years. Therefore, we do not have experience with other products.
Chose Planview Portfolios
Planview Portfolios is the market leader in the area, the flexibility of the product and the continuous investment by Planview makes Planview Portfolios currently the best in the market. The support organisation for implementation and run of Planview Portfolios rounds off the …
Chose Planview Portfolios
I was not with my organization at the time.
Chose Planview Portfolios
We are just in the process of deploying AgilePlace and will connect with Portfolios Smartsheet, which does have the functionality we need. We are just starting to use AgilePlace. We have a business group doing a proof of concept.
Chose Planview Portfolios
Planview has been growing continuously in the last decade or so, and its acquisitions of some big players in the market have imparted much-needed confidence in the tool. The ability to integrate Planview using APIs, Snap Logic, or Planview's own tool, 'Hub,' makes it stand out …
Chose Planview Portfolios
Planview Portfolios has an easier interface for users and executives. Ease of use was key for us.
Chose Planview Portfolios
We are currently in the process of evaluating but so far Planview seems to fit our needs the best. Portfolios was selected prior to me joining the team.
Chose Planview Portfolios
Planview Portfolios product capabilities positions it well, as a leader in the industry
Chose Planview Portfolios
Planview has much more potential in terms of it's products and capabilities. It can integrate more easily with many more of our other products and software. Planview reporting is much more intuitive.
Chose Planview Portfolios
n/a, the evaluation that I did was 4+ years ago. So much has changed since that time.
Chose Planview Portfolios
Planview Portfolios has an extremely robust data structure that supports many different use cases. Its customizability, large suite of features, and great customer service makes it a fantastic and scalable solution for many different businesses and business process …
Chose Planview Portfolios
When we first started using Planview it was not as user (PM) friendly as MS Project but has improved significantly over the years
Chose Planview Portfolios
I think Planview Portfolios is having very user friendly UI and easily navigate to different modules and proper naming conventions
Chose Planview Portfolios
In our organization we selected Planview Portfolios for the capabilities it offered.
Chose Planview Portfolios
Currently use both Planview Portfolios (larger customer scale) and ProjectPlace (minimal customer scale) both provide services we need.
Projector PSA
Chose Projector PSA
One other software our organization was looking at was Mavenlink. Compared to that, Projector PSA is more powerful and has more flexibility.
Chose Projector PSA
Projector PSA is a great option for entering time. Our employees have no issue allocating their time to the correct tasks types. Projector PSA does not require a written description for time, and our employees have noticed that this makes for a cleaner, straightforward entry. …
Chose Projector PSA
Projector PSA provided a better value and much smaller initial commitment. The implementation process required minimal professional services. Projector PSA also had a strong data security model to limit visibility appropriately to personnel using the system.
Chose Projector PSA
Projector had the most features that best aligned with our usage. We liked the scheduling and reporting features.
Chose Projector PSA

During our assessment of alternate systems we examined the functionality of: ASTEA, Technology One, SAP, Microsoft Project Server, and SalesForce.com. Offerings were assessed against the following evaluation criteria: system functionality, application integration, …

Chose Projector PSA
We did pursue Quick Arrow another tool that was similar. We found that be in inflexible in use. Projector allows a lot of flexibility in setup. Our organization has very specific business processes and we were able to set up Projector to work with those processes. Several other …
Chose Projector PSA
Primavera is an excellent product but much more sophisticated than what my department needed at the time I selected and recommended Projector PSA.
Chose Projector PSA
We switched to Projector from Open Air. While Open Air was a good tool, we found it wasn't really designed for project management at the level of detail we needed from our PSA and used MS Project and Excel to supplement Open Air. We also struggled with the invoicing side of it, …
Features
Copper ProjectPlanview PortfoliosProjector PSA
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Copper Project
9.4
Ratings
20% above category average
Planview Portfolios
-
Ratings
Projector PSA
7.4
Ratings
4% below category average
Task Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Resource Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Gantt Charts10.00 Ratings00 Ratings6.00 Ratings
Scheduling10.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Workflow Automation8.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.00 Ratings
Team Collaboration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.50 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology9.00 Ratings00 Ratings5.80 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology9.00 Ratings00 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Document Management10.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Email integration10.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.60 Ratings
Mobile Access10.00 Ratings00 Ratings3.70 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking9.00 Ratings00 Ratings9.50 Ratings
Change request and Case Management8.00 Ratings00 Ratings5.20 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management9.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.10 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Copper Project
9.8
Ratings
24% above category average
Planview Portfolios
-
Ratings
Projector PSA
7.9
Ratings
2% above category average
Quotes/estimates10.00 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Invoicing9.00 Ratings00 Ratings7.00 Ratings
Project & financial reporting10.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.50 Ratings
Integration with accounting software10.00 Ratings00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Copper ProjectPlanview PortfoliosProjector PSA
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
monday.com
monday.com
Score 8.3 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Enterprises
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
Planview PPM Pro
Planview PPM Pro
Score 9.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Copper ProjectPlanview PortfoliosProjector PSA
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
7.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
5.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Copper ProjectPlanview PortfoliosProjector PSA
Likelihood to Recommend
Copper Project is one of the best online project management and communication tools are available for businesses of all types. Creating and assigning the task to other team members becomes easy as it does on its own easily.
Read full review
Planview Portfolios is well suited to provide a single, central, view of the truth. There is clear expansion capabilities to integrate it as a true Enterprise toolset with existing organisation wide (not just delivery) - you can pick and choose what you need to implement and that list gets longer. The ability to quickly gain an understanding of resources within the overall portfolio and some really clever tools regarding capacity and demand modelling. I think the only challenge we have encountered is modelling our Business as Usual activity to a level of detail - this is due to other tools being very embedded not just in the organisation but across a lot of industries.
Read full review
We think Projector PSA is a great tool to track and manage people in a professional service environment like management consulting. This system is easy to set up, easy to understand and should easily suit the needs of smaller and medium sized firms. It may be less appropriate for firms that rely very heavily on project management through another system (like MS Project) or firms that rely very heavily on a sales pipeline tracking system. While still very much possible to use, you would (I believe) have to do some re-keying between systems
Read full review
Pros
  • It has been a great find for me as it reduces my work and make me more productive at other work which I usually neglect them because of excessive work.
  • The platform is trending on top of list worldwide because of its stand out feature task structure.
  • It comprises all the best tools and strategies that involve a successful activity development system.
Read full review
  • Out of the box analytics. Canned, but modestly configurable reports that provide quick insights to project and resource performance.
  • Flexible configuration enables resource management at a macro or micro level.
  • Modeling (what-if). I can create projects, load with resources and quickly stack it against our existing portfolios to identify conflicts and optimize scheduling.
Read full review
  • Time tracking. For a service company that typically bills retainers, it is very important to be able to assign a direct cost to your resources at all levels and analyze your profitability.
  • Expense reporting. Projector easily tracks expenses of all types and allows you to categorize them under non-billable projects, client billable projects and/or client development ventures.
  • Reporting. Projector has a large list of standard reports right at your fingertips. These reports can be extracted as Excel docs, mdp files and other useful formats. They are intuitive, clear and easy to analyze. For those you need on a standard basis, you can set them up to pull on a recurring basis. It should be noted that all reports are easily customized and Projector's support team is always there to help get you the information you need.
Read full review
Cons
  • The biggest drawback that Copper Project has that it becomes slow at times [in my experience].
  • Secondly, to manage anything in the platform I have to make a ticket every time to make any changes which are frustrating for me a lot.
  • [In my experience] it usually becomes clunky and slow while dealing with large requests which need to be change and functionality needs to improve more.
Read full review
  • Capturing lower-level detailed expenditures within a project so that financial screens can show the details of the roll-up.
  • Reporting flexibility so that end users can create their own quick ad hoc reports for analysis.
  • Capturing matrixed skills on resources to ensure staffing is adequate and better align demand to supply.
Read full review
  • The split between the desktop and web environments was awkward at times.
  • While the reporting modules are powerful, creating reports can be complex and required a fairly deep knowledge of the product.
  • The appearance and interface of the desktop application appears somewhat dated.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
No answers on this topic
Portfolios are useful enterprise solutions for new and old use cases. They have robust reporting capabilities and many opportunities to customize the functions without additional costs. Although some desired features are still in development, and the reporting infrastructure has some issues, Portfolios continue to offer more capabilities than we can take advantage of at any time.
Read full review
We have been using this tool for a year now and find our use of it continually evolves and broadens. We are also very excited about the overhaul that's under way and feel many of the improvements being put in place will help make us that much more effective and efficient. The Projector team is also very responsive and collaborative in terms of user feedback and improvement suggestions, which helps us know they will work hard to help us get what we need out of the tool.
Read full review
Usability
No answers on this topic
Perfect tool for planning resource time management. Giving flexibility with ease in uptodate . Team collabration . Team aligment. Top management aligment. Close the project with feed back . Team aligment. Expert contribution in task . Task management easy for project manager . Nice tool to have for project manager. Cost contol & project management is very easy with Planview
Read full review
Desktop interface feels complex to new users.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
We are long time Planview users and its availability is only limited to our internal SLAs for nightly backups. I have never experienced any unexpected or prolonged software downtime from Planview itself.
Read full review
In 5 years of use we have never experienced an unscheduled outage.
Read full review
Performance
No answers on this topic
There are occasions when the system is a bit sluggish. However, it may not always be on the Planview side. We are investing in better tools to monitor our network performance, which will help us diagnose issues more effectively in the future.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
No answers on this topic
Consultants are knowledgeable and friendly; it is easy to build relationships with the support people you work with and they learn how best to help you. The vendor is continuously looking for honest feedback about their tool and they use that information to design their product roadmaps
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
No answers on this topic
Generally good. Sometimes, users are a bit overwhelmed, and it takes multiple sessions for them to get the hang of it.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Always have a pre-implementation meeting or conference call with Planview to ensure all are on the same page, disclosure of all and any customization (including reports) and plan for support after implementation of a specified amount of time with the assigned implementation resource. And document everything
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Integration of the Copper Project is amazing. It is designed on such a great module that it can easily integrate with any other software. I have a lot of software already in my organization which we are using to handle different processes in the organization, Copper Project easily integrated with them and gives me all in one platform to manage all of my activities on one platform which is a great help for me.
Read full review
We are currently using Planview AgilePlace. Also we use Tasktop Hub for integrating with other applications within the organization. We would like to use ProjectPlace which is integrated with Planview Portfolios in the future.
Read full review
We switched to Projector from Open Air. While Open Air was a good tool, we found it wasn't really designed for project management at the level of detail we needed from our PSA and used MS Project and Excel to supplement Open Air. We also struggled with the invoicing side of it, manually combining invoice summaries with custom time and expense reports in Acrobat. Projector however, was designed for project management. We are able to manage projects, track time and expenses, and invoice all out of one system. The project setup can accommodate a wide range of complexity, including milestones, dependencies, etc. Project and resource dashboards also help see the services portfolio and team at a summary level and allows us to zero in on particulars easily and more meaningfully than we were ever able to with Open Air. Invoice templates are also easily customized and we were able to get several set up quickly to meet our needs. Lastly, Open Air required us to purchase and pre-pay licensing for a year, so if we lost staff mid-way through the year, the unused seat was not prorated. Projector licensing is paid monthly based on actual number of active users that month, which makes more sense for a team with fluctuating headcount.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
We are constantly growing and expanding. It is challenging to accommodate different user needs, but the system does provide means of doing that as we desire.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • This feature is also helping me a lot in making project structure and prioritizing things according to the flow of work, which is great as it gives clear path what to do next.
  • Customer support of Copper Project is very professional.
  • I recently had some problems while using the platform, they listened to the problem carefully and responded with a more feasible and workable solution within the limited time frame, which gives me the confidence to use the platform more in-depth.
Read full review
  • The positive impact is the ability to manage our projects enterprise wide.
  • Managing and reporting on projects and programs via portfolios makes it easy to identify troubled projects/programs that need immediate attention.
  • The negative is that pushing too much change too quickly is hard for us. We need to get our users focused on the basics of PM before we can adopt everything else. We need to introduce change to different companies based on their maturity level. Too much change too quickly is not always beneficial. We need to focus on core competencies.
Read full review
  • Even in the small time that I stayed to see Projector PSA reporting I saw ROI projections become more realistic. There was real data to analyze that proved we were spending way too much and charging way too less on some projects.
  • Although employees were not used at entering their hours, this single reporting improved operations management and validated employees concerns that more people were needed to manage workload
  • Project proposals were more realistic because they were driven by real data.
  • Decision making overall for the department became more efficient and effective
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planview Portfolios Screenshots

Screenshot of END to END VISIBILITY: Planview offers complete visibility across all strategic endeavors, the status, spend, and progress. This gives organizations a connected view of how all initiatives are tracking without having to manage disparate teams and tools.Screenshot of SCENARIO ANALYSIS: Unlike strategic portfolio management solutions that only allow users to create different plans and manually compare them, Planview users can compare plans, analyze investment trade-offs, and prioritize investments across different types of portfolios to ensure delivery of the best outcomes. This helps users to ensure the organization's capacity and investments are aligned to the highest priority initiatives.Screenshot of PERSONALIZED USER EXPERIENCE: Planview can create unique, real-time views based on a job and the status, progress, and other data-oriented use cases. As a result, it can pinpoint where to focus, issues to address, and risks to mitigate in a single view.Screenshot of DYNAMIC PLANNING AND FUNDING: Unlike applications that do not allow for the reprioritization of in-flight initiatives, with Planview you can pivot plans and key priorities at any time, and continue planning as needed based on your organizational strategies and goals. As a result, you get a portfolio mix of investments, initiatives, products, and projects that meet stakeholder and customer expectations.Screenshot of GENERATIVE AI ASSISTANT: Unlike other AI Copilots, Planview Copilot taps into decades of Planview knowledge and learnings from thousands of Planview customers to glean insights, derive recommendations based on best practices, and inform strategic decisions. It connects data across project and product initiatives to help you understand insights from all parts of your organization – and it does this using a natural language interface. As a result, you can surface previously hidden insights, identify delivery risks, and act in seconds.

Projector PSA Screenshots

Screenshot of Employee Dashboards help resources stay on task by displaying schedules and alerts.