Corelight vs. Lansweeper
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Corelight | Score9.7 out of 10 | N/A | Corelight headquartered in San Francisco offers their network monitoring solution designed to suit a number of purposes including discovering of network devices, identify vulnerable software running on devices, provide a platform for threat analytics and detect (potentially malicious) lateral traffic, and assessing the scope of any malware attack. | N/A |
Lansweeper | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | Lansweeper helps organizations see, understand, and make confident decisions about their technology estate across IT, OT, IoT, and Cloud. Lansweeper automatically discovers and inventories every asset: hardware, software, and user—then connects that data to insights about usage, lifecycle, and risk. This is to create what the vendor describes as Technology Asset Intelligence (TAI): a trusted foundation of knowledge that turns raw inventory data into clear, actionable… | $2,868 per year (includes 2000 assets) |
| Corelight | Lansweeper | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Corelight | Lansweeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 10 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 10 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 7 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | |
| Corelight | Lansweeper | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT Asset Management |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Corelight | Lansweeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Cisco Meraki Dashboard Score9 out of 10 | KACE Asset Management Appliance Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Cisco Prime LAN Management (discontinued) Score7.7 out of 10 | KACE Systems Management Appliance Score8.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Corelight | Lansweeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.9 |
| Corelight | Lansweeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Lansweeper Screenshots |








