Corrigo vs. Hippo CMMS

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Corrigo
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Corrigo, from JLL Technologies (acquired 2015) is a facilities and field service management (CMMS) software solution.N/A
Hippo CMMS
Score 2.6 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
Hippo CMMS is a maintenance management software tool for organizations of all sizes. It is a SaaS solution offering a customized interface designed to suit users' operational maintenance needs. The vendor states that Hippo’s UX design principle has always been the same: features only have value if they're easy to find and use, and so they state their layout is clean and intuitive, making the software a breeze to learn. Hippo CMMS has been providing maintenance software to…
$35
per month per user
Pricing
CorrigoHippo CMMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Hippo Starter
$35
per month per user
Hippo Plus
$55
per month per user
Hippo Pro
$75
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CorrigoHippo CMMS
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeRequired$600 Single User
Additional DetailsHippo CMMS subscription pricing is determined based on the number of users. A user is anyone that needs to log in and access Hippo' s core features. Users include managers, owners, technicians, and supervisors. Maintenance requesters are not users. Price is also determined by required features. We have pricing plans for complex operations that require deeper functionality and plans for simple operations that are new to CMMS.
More Pricing Information
Best Alternatives
CorrigoHippo CMMS
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.6 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.6 out of 10
TOPdesk
TOPdesk
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CorrigoHippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
2.4
(8 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
CorrigoHippo CMMS
Likelihood to Recommend
JLL Technologies
Corrigo is great for managing work orders and PM Schedules. Additionally, if you need to track KPIs, Corrigo's reporting is spot on—with automated reports and notifications, it is one of the strengths of this program. I don't recommend Corrigo for Asset Management, however, which is tricky since the PM Scheduling is such a strength.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I find that Hippo [CMMS] is really well suited for any scenario. Most CMMS are geared toward manufacturing or industrial use, Hippo [CMMS] works as well for a school or church as it would for a factory. The ease of use for the requestor makes it an ideal platform for any institution.
Read full review
Pros
JLL Technologies
  • KPI Reporting: there are some great canned reports that you can utilize but you can also build your own reports using their very simple report writer.
  • Report Notifications: you can set up automatic notifications for reports. Additionally, you can set up schedules for your reports and attach notifications to those report schedules as well.
  • PM Scheduling: you can automate your PM schedules thru Corrigo and set up multiple schedules.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Simple to use Work requester.
  • Great customer service and support.
  • Not filled with non-essential items like a lot of "Larger" company CMMS systems
Read full review
Cons
JLL Technologies
  • Asset Management: for such strong PM Scheduling, I would like to see better asset management within this product.
  • Managing users: his isn't the most intuitive process and could be simpler.
  • Support: once they get back to you, they can be very helpful but I find the wait time is too long.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Completed work order reporting can be improved. It seems harder than it should be to get the data I need.
  • I would like to streamline the work order closing procedure. I feel like it takes longer than it should to open various screens and add labor, mark tasks complete, change status, etc. It is a minor inconvenience, but just waiting a few seconds opening up a new window is time-consuming with many WO at a time.
  • Labor tracking and reporting could be improved.
Read full review
Support Rating
JLL Technologies
No answers on this topic
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
I've used Hippo for several years now. I'm sure other programs have been developed since I did my comparison testing. But Hippo has always done everything we needed it to do. It's very reliable. My guys don't doubt whether or not it's doing its job. The calendar view, ease of use and floor mapping set this program apart from others.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
JLL Technologies
We chose Corrigo for the PM Scheduling and Reporting capabilities plus its ability to integrate into other systems and provide a customer portal. This product is superior to others for those reasons. Plus the cost is on point for our size organization. Overall Corrigo was the better choice.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
Ease of end-user to put in a task that they would like to have completed. Hippo is really easy to use and to complete tasks. If a person putting in a task includes their email or phone number we can get ahold of them to ask and questions and it lets them know progress of their task.
Read full review
Return on Investment
JLL Technologies
  • It has helped us automate processes with multiple clients, making us (and them) more efficient
  • PM Scheduling and Reporting has saved us time and resources
  • We've had to figure out a way to manage assets however since Corrigo isn't really great for this. That has cost us extra time and resource.
Read full review
Eptura (formerly Condeco and iOFFICE + SpaceIQ)
  • Allows tracking something that we did not have before
  • Decision making is now with hard data
  • Replacement and repair cost have been reduced with tracking of maintenance.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Hippo CMMS Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of