CrowdStrike Falcon vs Skybox Security

• Ransomware protection. We ran a ransomware simulation with obfuscated executables to hide malware signatures and CrowdStrike found and stopped 15 out of 15.
• Malware/adware detection. Packaged adware in official installers are instantly blocked without interfering with the install of the primary application.

Read full review

• Its modules like firewall assurance and threat control work efficiently.
• We can get report related to all firewalls, that helped us in analyzing the risk of threats.
• It is available at a highly affordable price.

Read full review

• We get false positive detections when we run an email signature script for our users. These false positives can be a distraction. We've implemented a whitelist for those behaviors, but had some difficulty in figuring out how to configure CrowdStrike to recognize these executions since the file name and hash were always different (the executing file was firstname_lastname.exe, and that was too Vague to whitelist.

Read full review

• The management console could use work - move away from Java to HTML5 to something more lightweight
• Dynamic objects are not properly identified in Skybox

Read full review

• CrowdStrike has cut our security costs.
• Has given us more insight into our end points.
• It has helped with our older PC's CPU usage.
• Cut our cost and time from managing multiple platforms down to managing one platform with better insight than what we had with multiple security platforms.

Read full review

• Reduces cost in terms of time and money to spend in remediation activity.
• Improve the network topology and then it's possibile to reduce cost of network/security appliances where they're not necessary.
• The cost of the solution is not trivial when the number of network appliances is big.

Read full review