CSI WatchDOG vs. Diligent One Platform

CSI Watchdog is a great tool when carrying out individual vetting or multiple vetting and can help trace and trace elements that have been placed on red alert, allowing organizations to work with individuals whose reputation is not questionable. However, making entries on its screen can be a daunting task, especially for new users. One needs to familiarise themselves with these tools before one gains some level of proficiency and competence.

Incentivized

Product is a great tool to serve as a central point to compile and document sox controls. This allows transparency across the team and teammates to edit and view progress. The tool also provides an interface that will make it easy for the internal audit team to track and compile control requests. I particularly like how it lets all of the control owners take ownership of their controls. I am currently exploring some of the advanced tools that support testing and the accuracy and completeness of our data, which i'm very excited to explore.

Incentivized

• Vetting individuals
• Choice to use multiple red lists
• Option to run batch vetting

Incentivized

• HighBond is great for managing requests, to do’s, and review notes
• HighBond is generally flexible with the configuration and terminology you can use.
• HighBond is a good tool for centralizing risks, controls, test plans, and procedures in a framework that allows you to standardize its usage.

Incentivized

• The lack of template that can be used by novice users can be a huddle.
• I find it's UI a little basic, therefore improving on it would make it more competitive.

Incentivized

• The current setup does not have a risk management option.
• There is not an easy way to catalog all audits and then cycle through them.
• The set up of tabs within a project can be a bit cumbersome and excessive.

Incentivized

HighBond by Galvanize support has some of the best and fastest support that I have experienced. Though we only contact them through emails, they were quick to provide insightful information about our problems. Whenever we email them about an issue, they would be able to reply in less than an hour, ready and prepared with useful solutions to address the issue.

Incentivized

I was not involved in the implementation, but i do think the interface works well and is a great tool to centralize our compliance program. I'm currently in the process of exploring many of the advanced features and using the Diligent Academy to learn about some of these exciting features to add value to our organization. I recently attended a CPE and was very impressed with the presenters and their energy and knowledge of the product

Incentivized

The only other product I have used is the System for Award Management (SAM), maintained by the US Government. Compared to this, CSI WatchDOG is much more reliable and has more options. I also believe the batch vetting/screening option in CSI WatchDOG gives it a definite edge over SAM.

Incentivized

Diligent Highbond stacks up somewhat poorly against our other tools. In addition to what was included above, we use some smaller tools that fulfill many of the gaps left by Diligent Highbond. We have since started to move away from Diligent Highbond. Alteryx is better at processing data and their server tool can be used to publish results for review.

Incentivized

• We have been able to trace and track many red lists within a short period of time.
• Through CSI watchdog we are able to carry out batch vetting.

Incentivized

• It has saved me time generating status reports
• It has saved me time in coordinating with others to obtain information, since it tracks requests and sends reminders
• It saves time with to dos and open reviews to keep track of tasks to be completed

Incentivized