Cube vs. Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cube
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Cube is a financial planning & analysis (FP&A) platform that aims to enable finance teams to be more strategic and positively contribute to company growth activities by spending less time on manual, repetitive task, from Cube Planning headquartered in New York.
$1,500
per month
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Tagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.N/A
Pricing
CubeWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Editions & Modules
Cube Go
$1,500
per month
Cube Pro
$2,800
per month
Enterprise
Contact us
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CubeWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CubeWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
CubeWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.2
21 Ratings
3% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.56 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Customizable dashboards7.818 Ratings8.58 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates8.218 Ratings8.29 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.9
47 Ratings
7% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
21 Ratings
1% below category average
Drill-down analysis9.646 Ratings8.321 Ratings
Formatting capabilities8.635 Ratings8.421 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages7.76 Ratings7.77 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.728 Ratings8.213 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.1
21 Ratings
1% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.1
13 Ratings
1% below category average
Publish to Web7.911 Ratings8.49 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.111 Ratings8.212 Ratings
Report Versioning8.215 Ratings7.912 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.18 Ratings7.99 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.2
12 Ratings
8% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
7 Ratings
10% above category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.311 Ratings7.96 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization8.68 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Predictive Analytics8.37 Ratings8.76 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.74 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Cube
9.4
40 Ratings
8% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.3
20 Ratings
5% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.333 Ratings8.920 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.630 Ratings8.519 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.531 Ratings8.120 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.09 Ratings7.93 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.725 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.7
10 Ratings
9% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
6.9
9 Ratings
15% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access9.29 Ratings6.28 Ratings
Mobile Application8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.84 Ratings7.76 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.0
54 Ratings
4% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
47 Ratings
1% above category average
Long-term financial planning7.445 Ratings8.333 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.151 Ratings8.141 Ratings
Forecasting7.749 Ratings8.638 Ratings
Scenario modeling7.544 Ratings8.233 Ratings
Management reporting8.551 Ratings8.645 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.5
49 Ratings
6% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.3
43 Ratings
4% above category average
Financial data consolidation9.144 Ratings8.937 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.423 Ratings8.635 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.313 Ratings9.132 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.214 Ratings8.635 Ratings
Minority Ownership7.29 Ratings6.728 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting10.020 Ratings9.041 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.732 Ratings7.533 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.6
54 Ratings
5% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
47 Ratings
2% above category average
Financial Statement Reporting9.045 Ratings9.039 Ratings
Management Reporting8.448 Ratings8.945 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.449 Ratings7.847 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting7.438 Ratings8.132 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing8.95 Ratings8.218 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.5
37 Ratings
5% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.0
31 Ratings
1% below category average
Personalized dashboards8.430 Ratings7.726 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards8.015 Ratings7.520 Ratings
KPIs8.628 Ratings8.424 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.828 Ratings8.222 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting8.422 Ratings7.822 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data9.111 Ratings8.014 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Cube
9.1
46 Ratings
9% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.4
44 Ratings
1% above category average
Flat file integration9.135 Ratings8.238 Ratings
Excel data integration9.538 Ratings9.042 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.738 Ratings7.829 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CubeWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Small Businesses
IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
IBM Planning Analytics
IBM Planning Analytics
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Centage
Centage
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.0 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CubeWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(58 ratings)
8.3
(48 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(10 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(14 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(5 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(2 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(2 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CubeWolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Likelihood to Recommend
Cube Planning, Inc
1) The budget process. In QBO the budgeting capability is non-existant, unless you like manually typing in every scenario and not being able to budget by class. Cube houses my budget/forecast scenarios & lets me view and analyze by my company's preferred data points; department, GL account, vendor, & sales campaign. I'm able to run monthly budget variance reports and plan for the future with ease. 2) We've begun using Cube to help analyze profitablity by sales job. We've never had such easy access to this type of info in the past, so this is a benefit I can directly attribute to Cube. 3) We're beginning now to use an integration with our payroll software to work on headcount planning and payroll analysis.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Scenarios where CCH Tagetik is suitable is when a company have large amounts of data and want to transform, consolidate, store and produce reporting in different year, period etc with complex calculations and allocation. Tagetik is the tool for you in this case and it's very flexible in terms of creating your own business rule, calculation and reporting options with a user friendly interface. I have not thought about scenarios where it is not appropriate to use tagetik yet as the tool covers small and large business financial needs
Read full review
Pros
Cube Planning, Inc
  • Push/pull information across any Google Sheet or Excel workbook.
  • Budget at a much more granular level (by month by account by the department by vendor).
  • Custom mapping to allow for multiple cuts of the same data.
  • Bulk range selection within a workbook.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
  • Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
  • Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
  • Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
  • SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
  • AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
Read full review
Cons
Cube Planning, Inc
  • Limited to 8 top line dimensions. Although you can bring in as many attributes of data as you want, but I would really like Cube to increase top line dimensions to 10.
  • The ability for cross level interaction within multiples cube would be a major plus once implemented.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
  • Online help and manual is a bonus but could be improved e.g. the clarity of English explanations.
  • Improved Excel compatibility e.g. formula driven reporting and dash boarding.
  • Mobile phone connectivity e.g. launching a consolidation from a Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik app.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Because in my oppinion Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is one of the most usable tools for consolidation, planning (controlling) and reporting. Its usability is quite easy and innovative. I like the data entry method for the customers with its workflow and tasks, quite easy way to implement a co pilot. And i like the reporting tool, with a lot of customization opportunities.
Read full review
Usability
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Surprisingly, this platform is a powerhouse ERP system. However, given time, when more and more organization is able to identify how powerful this tool can be, CCH Tagetik is able to stand as a competitive advantage to many of the Financial industry of today. Although, it needs time to understand the logic behind how CCH Tagetik is formed and setup, once it is known to the user, it is an easy day to day operations with minimal maintenance.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
Read full review
Performance
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
I got very quick respons. After very little mail iterations, they decided to have online meeting to look together with me to the issue. They tried to solve it during the meeting. I had the impression that the customer care person really knew the system and was able to ask help from other colleagues when needed
Read full review
In-Person Training
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
the training was not bad, but we got more training from working with the consultants. This because it is based on our system
Read full review
Online Training
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Online training is the only form of training we could deploy during the pandemic. This service has been nonethless delivered with the same standards and the same results of the traditional training procedures.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cube Planning, Inc
Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality to have. Start up and early stage companies do not have the luxury of implementation teams and massive IT resources so Cube was a huge help.
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the application is much easier. IBM Cognos TM1 had a lot of issues with certain modules that could not be open concurrently; this would often lead to phantom data being entered in the system. I have not had these issues with CCH Tagetik.
Read full review
Scalability
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cube Planning, Inc
  • It has decreased the amount of time it takes to build reports by days
  • I can rest easy knowing the knowledge is accurate and there is no human error
  • I have been able to create more reports than I ever dreamed of with the new time and ease of use
Read full review
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
  • Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
  • A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
  • Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik Screenshots

Screenshot of Homepage