Cyberduck vs. IBM Spectrum Virtualize

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cyberduck
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Cyberduck is an open source libre server and cloud storage browser for Mac and Windows developed by Iterate, with support for FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, OpenStack Swift, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive, Google Drive and Dropbox.N/A
IBM Spectrum Virtualize
Score 9.9 out of 10
N/A
IBM Spectrum Virtualize supports provides data storage security and control across hybrid environments.N/A
Pricing
CyberduckIBM Spectrum Virtualize
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CyberduckIBM Spectrum Virtualize
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CyberduckIBM Spectrum Virtualize
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
CyberduckIBM Spectrum Virtualize
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Cyberduck
Cyberduck
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.4 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.4 out of 10
Cisco UCS Manager
Cisco UCS Manager
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CyberduckIBM Spectrum Virtualize
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(7 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
4.8
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CyberduckIBM Spectrum Virtualize
Likelihood to Recommend
Open Source
Our data being the primary operational product has been managed effectively by this software. It is best suited in storing data in our cloud servers and transferring files across our company. It is easy and flexible to work with this product. It provides end to end encryption of data promoting data safety and transfer. Compatibility with our operating system is effective and all services have been great.
Read full review
IBM
Saves hours of staff time copying data from one Disk Array/Block Storage to newer system without impacting the servers that are using the SAN. We have virtualized storage like VMware/HyperVee virtualizes servers. Takes the complications out of being a SAN administrator.
Read full review
Pros
Open Source
  • Transferring of files is quick and simple.
  • The interface is easy to use and understand.
  • The setting up of new ftp sites is straight forward.
Read full review
IBM
  • Virtualizes all your Block Storage
  • Works on Fibre Channel or iSCSI
  • Saves time, engineering and money for overtime of just watching data copy
Read full review
Cons
Open Source
  • It could be a lot easier to grab a download link. Currently you have to right-click, scroll to "Copy URL," and then pick your desired version of the download URL. There are WAY too many options, and it makes it difficult. I have never needed any option other than the HTTPS version of the URL. So it's overly complicated when it doesn't need to be.
  • There are at times completely unnecessary alert messages that pop up. Usually when connecting to a server to upload a file it will pop up a message that says the connection has been verified and it's safe to continue uploading. It's really unnecessary and annoying to have to dismiss it every time.
  • I think the UI could be a little less cramped. Everything is so close together--really feels like a dated UI. If items were just a bit more spaced out, it would improve the UI significantly.
Read full review
IBM
  • Costly but worth every dime in staff hours saved
  • Each generation has its limits on Fibre Channel speed it supports and one must upgrade the nodes to get to higher speeds
  • User Interface is now light speed ahead of where it started.
Read full review
Usability
Open Source
I really like the basic interface and folder like structure. It makes me feel like I'm in a regular folder window on my Mac. Navigation is simple. The toolbar is customizable to be able to add or remove icons to improve the simplicity and ease of use of the application. The app is very simply designed, which I appreciate.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Open Source
I've never needed to use their support service. The few issues I've had were user-error and quickly resolved with a little googling
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Open Source
FileZilla and WinSCP are the two main alternatives to Cyberduck within my organization, and really the two main freeware competitors that I know of. Cyberduck is suited for those without a high level of technical background, and as one might guess, is also the easiest to use and navigate. FileZilla and WinSCP are both easier to use when it comes to key storage and SSH configuration, but these are tasks that our IT department does on Cyberduck for users with less technical knowledge. By us doing these tasks, the end business user is able to utilize a simple tool for their needs.
Read full review
IBM
IBM Spectrum Protect Virtualize beats ALL competition hands down, and one does not need to deal with the complications that are put into some of the Disk Array/ block Storage systems. Excellent Storage management and can see performance of your SAN that goes thru it easily.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Open Source
  • Trustworthy FTP management, no bloat.
  • Fast login and server history makes it easy to jump in and make changes or fix problems
Read full review
IBM
  • Positive ROI and saves labor costs of engineers
  • Fast to implement
  • Worth the cost !!
Read full review
ScreenShots