What users are saying about
8 Ratings
39 Ratings
8 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 9.2 out of 100
39 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.4 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Cypress.io is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend
  • Cypress.io and LambdaTest are tied in 1 area: Likelihood to Renew

Likelihood to Recommend

9.6

Cypress.io

96%
2 Ratings
9.5

LambdaTest

95%
22 Ratings

Likelihood to Renew

10.0

Cypress.io

100%
1 Rating
10.0

LambdaTest

100%
1 Rating

Usability

Cypress.io

N/A
0 Ratings
9.4

LambdaTest

94%
2 Ratings

Support Rating

Cypress.io

N/A
0 Ratings
9.2

LambdaTest

92%
4 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

Cypress.io Inc

Everything web-based should be testable. Even our highly dynamic content-providing web application works well. Hopefully, it will get a bigger user base in the future so that one can find even more support at StackOverflow or similar forums.
Read full review

LambdaTest, Inc.

[Lambda Test] is suitable while building a website and for cross browser testing on emulators and simulators but if something is extremely mission critical and you can not afford slightest of error you need to find other solution with real device testing. Web app testing can be done, even page behind login is also there but native app testing of APK files is not there. Before making a decision check with your needs. Apart from these missing capabilities they are pretty much on point with the performance and usability of the platform.
Read full review

Pros

Cypress.io Inc

  • autimation of end to end testing of web UI and api
  • Getting insight on failing and passing tests
Read full review

LambdaTest, Inc.

  • Offers geolocation testing in automation which is amazing!
  • You can select browsers, timezone, country and run the capability to start testing instantly.
  • We could scale up with parallel testing on local environment without any maintenance cost.
  • Integration with project management tools like JIRA, CI/CD tools like Jenkins, Gitlab which makes our test cycle easier
Read full review

Cons

Cypress.io Inc

  • Pick tool to identify elements doesn't work well.
  • Easier installation or manual for it.
Read full review

LambdaTest, Inc.

  • I'll recommend them to provide access to multiple users at the same time for the same virtual machine.
  • When I switched between the versions of the browser, the session expires and sometimes it feels lousy.
  • If I do not consider above two, I don't think there is a room for improvement.
Read full review

Pricing Details

Cypress.io

Starting Price

Editions & Modules

Cypress.io editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    LambdaTest

    Starting Price

    $15 per month per user

    Editions & Modules

    LambdaTest editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules
    Live15/Month1
    Web & Mobile Browser Automation (Includes Live)99/ Month2
    Lite, Lifetime Free03
    Web Automation$158/per month4

    Footnotes

    1. 1 concurrent sessions/10 users
    2. 1 Parallel Test, 5 Users
    3. 1 Concurrent session Per Month
    4. 2 Parallel Tests, 10 Users

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    For Enterprises Customize plans are also available. Please contact our Chat Support or drop us email at support@lambdatest.com

    Likelihood to Renew

    Cypress.io Inc

    Highly satisfied and [a] big fan.
    Read full review

    LambdaTest, Inc.

    No answers on this topic

    Usability

    Cypress.io Inc

    No answers on this topic

    LambdaTest, Inc.

    LambdaTest provides video recording and screenshots of all your tests in their test logs, which makes tracking easier. Test statuses, such as Lambda Error and VM allocation, allowed us to quickly troubleshoot any build that failed while executing. So overall, it's been great to use for our Tester and Developer team.
    Read full review

    Support Rating

    Cypress.io Inc

    No answers on this topic

    LambdaTest, Inc.

    The customer support team is very active and cooperative. Once, I contacted them in their off timings because of an issue, I got an instant reply from the executive and he resolved the issue very efficiently. This is why we have been using LambdaTest for more than two years. It is best suited for us.
    Read full review

    Alternatives Considered

    Cypress.io Inc

    Cypress.io is easy to start with and is independent of other automation tools. Unless we are looking for automating every edge case, Cypress.io can do it without using any plugins. Also, when a test fails, we can travel back to the state in which the test failed (aka time travel feature of Cypress.io), which makes debugging the failure or reporting the failure easy.
    Read full review

    LambdaTest, Inc.

    • LambdaTest is affordable
    • It has easier IU
    • Faster and many times feels more stable than competitors
    • LambdaTest has a good enough trial period. what do you expect to get from 1 minute trial from browser-stack?
    • No other company is providing anything similar to LT Browser. Other alternatives are very expensive or unstable.
    Read full review

    Return on Investment

    Cypress.io Inc

    • Flaky tests can be caught easily
    • Regration testing of application with Cypress.io helps to maintain quality of the software product.
    Read full review

    LambdaTest, Inc.

    • It saved a lot of time because you don’t need to run different tools to check various features.
    • LambdaTest helped our team in managing and tracking bugs on websites.
    • Needs a single click for entering into virtual testing environment; it is very user friendly.
    Read full review

    Screenshots

    Add comparison