Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Datadog
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Datadog is a monitoring service for IT, Dev and Ops teams who write and run applications at scale, and want to turn the massive amounts of data produced by their apps, tools and services into actionable insight.
$1.27
per month (billed annually) per host
VuNet Systems
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
VuNet Systems headquartered in Bangalore offers an AIOps platform that aims to connect user experience, customer journeys, business transactions, infrastructure and IT operations, and is designed to provide a comprehensive bird’s eye view of the IT operations to derive real time business and operational insights on the platform.N/A
Pricing
DatadogVuNet Systems
Editions & Modules
Log Management
$1.27
per month (billed annually) per host
Infrastructure
$15.00
per month (billed annually) per host
Standard
$18
per month per host
Enterprise
$27
per month per host
DevSecOps Pro
$27
per month per host
APM
$31.00
per month (billed annually) per host
DevSecOps Enterprise
$41
per month per host
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DatadogVuNet Systems
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing. Multi-Year/Volume discounts available (500+ hosts/mo).
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
DatadogVuNet Systems
Considered Both Products
Datadog
Chose Datadog
Its the Enterprise level decision, definitely usability and features perspective Datadog is much more advanced.
Chose Datadog
Datadog is significantly more user-friendly than CloudWatch.In terms of capabilities, they're similar.
I would not call either of the best-in-class for any single feature, but Datadog feels more polished and ready to use overall.Multi-cloud monitoring is a clear differentiator …
Chose Datadog
Datadog dashboard is very intuitive and offer seamless integration into multi-cloud platform compared to its competitor.
Chose Datadog
I use Datadog because it concentrates all these features into a single tool, facilitating the learning curve that my platform and development engineering team needs in order to be able to set up the monitors/alerts/SLIs/SLOs as well as to diagnose a production issue. Its easier …
Chose Datadog
Datadog seems to be the most feature-rich of all the alternatives we've considered, however due to problems outlined earlier, some of the others have benefits. OpenTel can give us a way to make our platforms compatible with a variety of vendors, and can be done without …
Chose Datadog
Datadog is a more complex but complete solution than any of the other Log Aggregation, monitoring, or general observabilty tools that we have trialed. I found it easier to setup following useful and up-to-date documentation provided directly by Datadog instead of scattered …
Chose Datadog
Kibana
Datadog
… because within our usecase we have all the events in kibana but sampled traces in Datadog … but if we had all the traces it would have been much more useful
Chose Datadog
I think Datadog and sentry serve different needs. I like sentry to keep track of errors on our systems. And then I'll jump into Datadog to investigate those issues.
Chose Datadog
We have utilized a SIEM in the past, but it was a very manual process to set it up. Content packs make it very easy to set up and get alerting instantly. Datadog takes out a lot of headaches for our security team, since they no longer have to create custom alerts for every …
Chose Datadog
First think first - it's easy to use, and very easy to implement in any infrastructure. It provides a custom dashboard and monitors. I’ve used or evaluated Grafana, Prometheus, Amazon CloudWatch, and Dynatrace, and each tool has strong capabilities. Prometheus + Grafana provide …
Chose Datadog
Wavefront seems to be better at observability and allows more custom query language.
Chose Datadog
All other tools dont have all the features which Datadog provides.
Easy to use from UI where other may have complicated UI or no UI at all to create monitors. Consider like AWS grafana, we have limitation to create monitors from UI. There is no recurring downtime for monitors. …
Chose Datadog
UI of the Datadog is easy to understand and integration steps are easy to understand. It also provides the troubleshooting steps which are easy to understand. Supports multi cloud integrations which is very important for all the customers to know about the cloud service's …
Chose Datadog
we primarily use Kubernetes, and Prometheus is great for collecting time series metrics, especially in Kubernetes. and Grafana is used for dashboards. As these are open source, we host them and manage them internally. We choose Datadog because of its logs, traces, and …
Chose Datadog
I selected Datadog because of its features and the wide range of integration support. As I already told it supports more that 600+ integrations which helps and organization to keep everything in a single place and also its AI feature which is reducing the time for root cause …
Chose Datadog
1. Grafana is good, but a lot of integration is required for it to work. .that not the case of Datadog
2. Faster to set up Datadog instead of Grafana
3. Alerting in Datadog feels much easier thanin Grafana.
Chose Datadog
Datadog is best for cloud-native and fast-setup. It is more mature for infrastructure and real-time observability. The UI is more user-friendly and provides wide coverage of app insights.
Chose Datadog
I have tried and used a number of other tools similar to Datadog such as New Relic, Splunk, Prometheus, AWS cloudwatch and Dynatrace. New Relic and Splunk provide excellent monitoring and analytics, but Datadog’s consolidated dashboards and ease of setup combined with a wealth …
Chose Datadog
Our logs are very important, and Datadog manages them exceptionally well. We frequently use Datadog services for our investigations. Use case: Monitor your apps, infrastructure, APIs, and user experience.
Chose Datadog
ease of use and implementation, other than new relic (which I think is terrible in every possible way), the other two support opentelemetry better, have more manageable costs and comparable basic services, but they do not have the breadt of services dd does.
Chose Datadog
We moved to Datadog from Microsoft's Application Insights. Application Insights did a fine job in allowing us to view our application data, but it lacked the holistic view of all our infrastructure and other platforms that could not use Application Insights. Being able to …
Chose Datadog
In terms of usability, I’ve found Datadog significantly more approachable and powerful compared to Elasticsearch, especially for day-to-day operational monitoring. Datadog offers a much more cohesive, user-friendly interface out of the box, with built-in support for metrics, …
VuNet Systems

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
DatadogVuNet Systems
Small Businesses
Amazon CloudWatch
Amazon CloudWatch
Score 7.8 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
LogicMonitor
LogicMonitor
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
ManageEngine Site24x7
ManageEngine Site24x7
Score 10.0 out of 10
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DatadogVuNet Systems
Likelihood to Recommend
8.9
(0 ratings)
8.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
5.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DatadogVuNet Systems
Likelihood to Recommend
Datadog works really well with complex microservices architecture like any E-commerce platform which will be having multiple services but they all are interdependent to others so in this scenario Datadog will be best to monitor these as it will show the transactions also between those microservices. If you are using multiple services in your architecture whether it will be cloud services or on prem services Datadog will be the best choice to monitor all those service with in Datadog so that you can see everything in a single place. But if you are having small architecture and few services in that then in that scenario you can use Datadog but it will be little costly as compared to other but obviously the features are very well.
Read full review
I definitely [recommend] VuNet Systems for the following. 1. Richness of reports. 2. Ease of use. 3. Strong support team. 4. Flexibility in changing the product road map according to our requirements. 5. Acknowledging and Appreciating our feedback. 6. Improving and prioritizing the product features. 7. Brings confidence and confirmations to the decisions.
Read full review
Pros
  • Create Dashboards as per application, environments, and Custom metrics in one panel.
  • Log aggregation, one-stop Application monitoring tools for the whole infrastructure.
  • Playbooks, SLA definition, success and error quotas, request visualizations.
  • DB monitoring, Serverless stack monitoring.
  • Alerting of Production incidents so we can quickly resolve the issues on time.
Read full review
  • VuNet Systems provides real-time visibility on the health and performance of all the components
  • Flexibility to ingest data from variety of data sources
  • Ability to handle huge volume to data and to integrate with tools like Microsoft teams to get the real-time alerts
  • Real-time insights and ease to use tool to perform detail analysis
  • Team technical knowledge and capability to implement complex requirements
Read full review
Cons
  • Alert windows cause lag in notifications (e.g. if the alert window is X errors in 1 hour, we won't get alerted until the end of the 1 hour range)
  • I would appreciate more supportive examples for how to filter and view metrics in the explorer
  • I would like a more clear interface for metrics that are missing in a time frame, rather than only showing tags/etc. for metrics that were collected within the currently viewed time frame
Read full review
  • Some of the items being worked on in the roadmap include automated discovery, improved correlation and automated resolution of incidents.
  • VuNet Systems platform does not provide code level visibility. They are not in this space.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Definitely will not revisit after our issues and, in my opinion, poor support.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
There is some room for improvement, but the Datadog team sends out updates frequently, and the UI is user-friendly for engineers, with no significant loading issues or region-specific problems. That was one of the key reasons we preferred Datadog; our company has employees worldwide, and it wasn't difficult to transition to the tool.
Read full review
Comparably the tool is simple to configure and roll out. It does the heavy duty analysis and provides actionable insights. Features to feed insights, fine tune the log interpretation, reminder service to adjust the threshold levels for a workload performance need to be added. Training programs for Monitoring teams if improved this could be an amazing tool for DC elements and IT teams
Read full review
Support Rating
The support team usually gets it right. We did have a rather complicate issue setting up monitoring on a domain controller. However, they are usually responsive and helpful over chat. The downside would be I don’t think they have any phone support. If that is important to you this might not be a good fit.
Read full review
Given this rating because they have provided us great support throughout the implementation process and post-implementation as well.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Documentation was difficult to work through, rollout was catastrophic (completely outage)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Datadog is a more complex but complete solution than any of the other Log Aggregation, monitoring, or general observabilty tools that we have trialed. I found it easier to setup following useful and up-to-date documentation provided directly by Datadog instead of scattered around many blogs or articles. I would love to have my own Grafana + Prometheus expert to setup all the peices we need but you're paying for expertise there instead of an experience with Datadog.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Saved us (time & money) from developing our own monitoring utilities that would pale in comparison
  • Alerts allow us to remedy issues before our customers even know about them
  • Tracking resource usage over time allows us to better plan for future needs, before it becomes a pain-point.
Read full review
  • We can say it had a very positive impact if we are speaking in terms of ROI. As the result that we got for the time and efforts invested in implementing VuNet in our organization is really great.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Datadog Screenshots

Screenshot of the out-of-the-box and customizable monitoring dashboards.Screenshot of Datadog's collaboration features, where users can discuss issues in-context with production data, annotate changes and notify their teams, see who responded to that alert before, and discover what was done to fix it.Screenshot of where Datadog unifies traces, metrics, and logs—the three pillars of observability.Screenshot of some of Datadog's 400+ built-in integrations.Screenshot of Datadog's Service Map, which decomposes an application into all its component services and draws the observed dependencies between these services in real timeScreenshot of centralized log data, pulled from any source.