The Dataiku platform unifies data work from analytics to Generative AI. It supports enterprise analytics with visual, cloud-based tooling for data preparation, visualization, and workflow automation.
N/A
Jupyter Notebook
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Jupyter Notebook is an open-source web application that allows users to create and share documents containing live code, equations, visualizations and narrative text. Uses include: data cleaning and transformation, numerical simulation, statistical modeling, data visualization, and machine learning. It supports over 40 programming languages, and notebooks can be shared with others using email, Dropbox, GitHub and the Jupyter Notebook Viewer. It is used with JupyterLab, a web-based IDE for…
N/A
TensorFlow
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
TensorFlow is an open-source machine learning software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. It was originally developed by Google.
N/A
Pricing
Dataiku
Jupyter Notebook
TensorFlow
Editions & Modules
Discover
Contact sales team
Business
Contact sales team
Enterprise
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Dataiku
Jupyter Notebook
TensorFlow
Free Trial
Yes
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Dataiku
Jupyter Notebook
TensorFlow
Features
Dataiku
Jupyter Notebook
TensorFlow
Platform Connectivity
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
8.6
5 Ratings
3% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
9.0
22 Ratings
8% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources
8.05 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources
10.04 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection
10.05 Ratings
8.514 Ratings
00 Ratings
MDM Integration
6.52 Ratings
7.415 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
10.0
5 Ratings
17% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
7.0
22 Ratings
19% below category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Visualization
10.05 Ratings
6.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis
10.05 Ratings
8.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
9.5
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
9.5
22 Ratings
15% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment
9.05 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Transformations
9.05 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Encryption
10.04 Ratings
8.514 Ratings
00 Ratings
Built-in Processors
10.04 Ratings
9.314 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku
8.5
5 Ratings
1% above category average
Jupyter Notebook
9.3
22 Ratings
10% above category average
TensorFlow
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools
8.05 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning
8.05 Ratings
9.218 Ratings
00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development
8.05 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery
10.04 Ratings
8.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Product A and Product B
Dataiku is an awesome tool for data scientists. It really makes our lives easier. It is also really good for non technical users to see and follow along with the process. I do think that people can fall into the trap of using it without any knowledge at all because so much is automated, but I dont think that is the fault of Dataiku.
I've created a number of daisy chain notebooks for different workflows, and every time, I create my workflows with other users in mind. Jupiter Notebook makes it very easy for me to outline my thought process in as granular a way as I want without using innumerable small. inline comments.
TensorFlow is great for most deep learning purposes. This is especially true in two domains: 1. Computer vision: image classification, object detection and image generation via generative adversarial networks 2. Natural language processing: text classification and generation. The good community support often means that a lot of off-the-shelf models can be used to prove a concept or test an idea quickly. That, and Google's promotion of Colab means that ideas can be shared quite freely. Training, visualizing and debugging models is very easy in TensorFlow, compared to other platforms (especially the good old Caffe days). In terms of productionizing, it's a bit of a mixed bag. In our case, most of our feature building is performed via Apache Spark. This means having to convert Parquet (columnar optimized) files to a TensorFlow friendly format i.e., protobufs. The lack of good JVM bindings mean that our projects end up being a mix of Python and Scala. This makes it hard to reuse some of the tooling and support we wrote in Scala. This is where MXNet shines better (though its Scala API could do with more work).
The integrated windows of frontend and backend in web applications make it cumbersome for the developer.
When dealing with multiple data flows, it becomes really confusing, though they have introduced a feature (Zones) to cater to this issue.
Bundling, exporting, and importing projects sometimes create issues related to code environment. If the code environment is not available, at least the schema of the flow we should be able to import should be.
Need more Hotkeys for creating a beautiful notebook. Sometimes we need to download other plugins which messes [with] its default settings.
Not as powerful as IDE, which sometimes makes [the] job difficult and allows duplicate code as it get confusing when the number of lines increases. Need a feature where [an] error comes if duplicate code is found or [if a] developer tries the same function name.
Theano is perhaps a bit faster and eats up less memory than TensorFlow on a given GPU, perhaps due to element-wise ops. Tensorflow wins for multi-GPU and “compilation” time.
The user experience is very good. Everything feels intuitive and "flows" (sorry excuse the pun) so nicely, and the customization level is also appropriate to the tool. Even as a newer data scientist, it felt easy to use and the explanations/tutorials were very good. The documentation is also at a good level
Jupyter is highly simplistic. It took me about 5 mins to install and create my first "hello world" without having to look for help. The UI has minimalist options and is quite intuitive for anyone to become a pro in no time. The lightweight nature makes it even more likeable.
The open source user community is friendly, helpful, and responsive, at times even outdoing commercial software vendors. Documentation is also top notch, and usually resolves issues without the need for human interactions. Great product design, with a focus on user experience, also makes platform use intuitive, thus reducing the need for explicit support.
Community support for TensorFlow is great. There's a huge community that truly loves the platform and there are many examples of development in TensorFlow. Often, when a new good technique is published, there will be a TensorFlow implementation not long after. This makes it quick to ally the latest techniques from academia straight to production-grade systems. Tooling around TensorFlow is also good. TensorBoard has been such a useful tool, I can't imagine how hard it would be to debug a deep neural network gone wrong without TensorBoard.
Anaconda is mainly used by professional data scientists who have profound knowledge of Python coding, mainly used for building some new algorithm block or some optimization, then the module will be integrated into the Dataiku pipeline/workflow. While Dataiku can be used by even other kinds of users.
With Jupyter Notebook besides doing data analysis and performing complex visualizations you can also write machine learning algorithms with a long list of libraries that it supports. You can make better predictions, observations etc. with it which can help you achieve better business decisions and save cost to the company. It stacks up better as we know Python is more widely used than R in the industry and can be learnt easily. Unlike PyCharm jupyter notebooks can be used to make documentations and exported in a variety of formats.
Keras is built on top of TensorFlow, but it is much simpler to use and more Python style friendly, so if you don't want to focus on too many details or control and not focus on some advanced features, Keras is one of the best options, but as far as if you want to dig into more, for sure TensorFlow is the right choice