Datamatics TruBot vs. SAP Build

Best suited for: 1. Processing complex, bulk and multiple source of data 2. working with SQL Database 3. Automating any web browser based activities Not appropriate: 1. Automation of mMacro based excel utilities

Incentivized

SAP Build is a strong and reliable partner with a rich FAQ and consulting power. New features make sense and are easy to distribute within the team and to end users. The community is nice, and there are many discussions on product development, shared solutions, and productivity improvements. UI is also one of the strongest points.

Incentivized

• Datamatics RPA TruBot's intelligent component helps business owners to make smart decisions. It is integrated with cognitive capabilities and application programming interface.
• Datamatics RPA TruBot automates a high volume of rule-based tasks in a short span of time and accuracy, which allows employees to perform high value tasks.
• Datamatics RPA TruBot gives analytics, which help in timely reporting, which leads to streamlining the processes.

Incentivized

• Its drag and drop editor is even simpler than the very popular WordPress
• No code feature to build any type of website
• Not a lot of technical expertise is required to use this tool
• The client loves it as they can themselves use it for quick tweaks

Incentivized

• The tool is not very compatible [with the] cloud. They heavily rely on on-premises deployment. [It would be nice to have more] cloud adoption.
• The license model needs to be modified. Licenses should not be tied to a machine or a user, instead, they should be with the number of active instances.

Incentivized

• Comparing to other RPA Tools, SAP Build automation lacks enough user guidance.
• Licensing is a little bit confusing.
• From a technical perspective, older versions of the automation part are not always stable, but the other services (workflow, business rules, apps, etc.) are much more stable.

Incentivized

It's really a good platform and they always create a unique way to solve the issue.

Incentivized

The SAP Build Apps is definitely getting better, however it is still not as easy to use and complete as some other solutions. This makes it a bit harder to use for Functional Consultants for example. SAP Build Process automation on the other hand is so easy, that everybody can build processes in it.

Incentivized

Datamatics is ready to do the process studies and give you solutions from their side.

Incentivized

There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.

Incentivized

The [Datamatics] RPA TruBot is more simple and easy to understand for a nontechnical person as compared to the Microsoft Azur Systems. Also, [Datamatics] RPA TruBot is more cost-effective and provides better support as compared to the Microsoft Azur Systems. [Datamatics] RPA TruBot provides free training sessions, where else [Azur Systems] provides paid certifications.

Incentivized

SAP Build stacks up well against the others in terms of what our business needs in order to succeed. It's more of a necessity than the others, but we keep them in mind as we utilize SAP Build. SAP Build's fluidity is great, but it could also be due to our lead user of the softwarre.

Incentivized

• [It] reduced the number of working hours required.
• [It] increased [the] employee and customer satisfaction rate.
• [It] increased efficiency by three-fold.

Incentivized

• SAP Build apps has a high ROI. Development is fast and cloud pricing is good.
• Business objectives are handled better than any other solution for custom app development in the SAP ecosystem.
• Process Automation workflows are very fast to develop, mostly graphically, and work very well.

Incentivized