Datamatics TruBot vs. SAP Build

Best suited for: 1. Processing complex, bulk and multiple source of data 2. working with SQL Database 3. Automating any web browser based activities Not appropriate: 1. Automation of mMacro based excel utilities

Incentivized

The SAP Build Process product is best suited for managing pipelines and scrum boards without limitations. Implementation of the software is also simple, and unlimited users can connect the software with third-party systems to push codes. The software integrates well with other products, making it easy to build and deploy pipelines. The only issue with the SAP Build Process is the cost of implementation, which is far higher than that of other similar products.

Incentivized

• Datamatics RPA TruBot's intelligent component helps business owners to make smart decisions. It is integrated with cognitive capabilities and application programming interface.
• Datamatics RPA TruBot automates a high volume of rule-based tasks in a short span of time and accuracy, which allows employees to perform high value tasks.
• Datamatics RPA TruBot gives analytics, which help in timely reporting, which leads to streamlining the processes.

Incentivized

• Its drag and drop editor is even simpler than the very popular WordPress
• No code feature to build any type of website
• Not a lot of technical expertise is required to use this tool
• The client loves it as they can themselves use it for quick tweaks

Incentivized

• The tool is not very compatible [with the] cloud. They heavily rely on on-premises deployment. [It would be nice to have more] cloud adoption.
• The license model needs to be modified. Licenses should not be tied to a machine or a user, instead, they should be with the number of active instances.

Incentivized

• The only one I can think of that has made me not continuously use SAP Build is the cost of this tool. I see it a bit higher compared to other tools that provide the same functionality for cheaper or free plans.

Incentivized

It's really a good platform and they always create a unique way to solve the issue.

Incentivized

Although coding would be helpful for improved automation and debugging, it is not a problem for any user to create a workflow and automate things as they wish. We spend way less time on training and developing workflows ourselves. There are also features such as a screen recorder. We have guides internally to teach how to automate better.

Incentivized

Datamatics is ready to do the process studies and give you solutions from their side.

Incentivized

There are, for example, great blog writings about automation cases and examples. The studio version is updated often. There are also useful OpenSAP online courses.

Incentivized

The [Datamatics] RPA TruBot is more simple and easy to understand for a nontechnical person as compared to the Microsoft Azur Systems. Also, [Datamatics] RPA TruBot is more cost-effective and provides better support as compared to the Microsoft Azur Systems. [Datamatics] RPA TruBot provides free training sessions, where else [Azur Systems] provides paid certifications.

Incentivized

Compared to Mendix, we decided not to go for low code application building and in the other parts of Build, Build is stronger and better integrated with SAP. On the hand of Coding, using Build Code, gives us Joule, which understands SAP better and also have a tighter and more secure coupling with SAP services.

Incentivized

• [It] reduced the number of working hours required.
• [It] increased [the] employee and customer satisfaction rate.
• [It] increased efficiency by three-fold.

Incentivized

• It has reduced the time to develop an app since it has an intuitive interface and allows peer collaboration.
• Produces quality apps through the integration of different plugins, hence improving quality.
• Has made it easy to developer to design apps in their own design.

Incentivized