Autotask PSA is designed as a complete IT Business Management Platform for MSPs, now from Datto (resulting from the Autotask merger with Datto in 2017).
N/A
Hornbill
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Hornbill Supportworks is a comprehensive ITSM platform offered by a UK-based company. It competes with BMC Remedy, ServiceNow, Cherwell, FrontRange, and CA Technologies.
N/A
Pricing
Datto Autotask PSA
Hornbill Supportworks ITSM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autotask PSA
Hornbill
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Datto Autotask PSA
Hornbill Supportworks ITSM
Features
Datto Autotask PSA
Hornbill Supportworks ITSM
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
Hornbill Supportworks ITSM
4.4
3 Ratings
61% below category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets
00 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Expert directory
00 Ratings
3.03 Ratings
Service restoration
00 Ratings
4.03 Ratings
Self-service tools
00 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
00 Ratings
4.93 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
00 Ratings
5.03 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards
00 Ratings
3.03 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
Hornbill Supportworks ITSM
2.4
3 Ratings
110% below category average
Configuration mangement
00 Ratings
3.93 Ratings
Asset management dashboard
00 Ratings
2.22 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement
00 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
In my opinion, Datto Autotask is exceptionally complicated to set up, manage, and use on a daily basis. I would think the target market for this product would be someone managing a team of 20 - 50 people, possibly more. In my experience, for it to run properly you will need to dedicate at least half an FTE to running this product in an organization of that size per month. I would not recommend it for companies with less than 10 people or for companies that value quick communication with their clients. I would not recommend it for companies using Datto's RMM product. The integration exists, but it is clearly a bolt-on. They were not developed together and they are slow to talk to each other. Frequently you cannot add details from RMM sessions into the PSA without manually copying the ticket number, and if the ticket is more than a week old, then you can't even find it with the ticket number.
The concept of the solution is a good one and in theory, Hornbill Supportworks ITSM is good for incoming inquiries/tickets management. The inquiries can be automatically captured by a user submitting a request, and an email notification is sent to both the Helpdesk team and the customer. The inquiries are then tracked, alerting the team when the SLA is about to be/has been breached. Once the inquiry has been resolved, it notifies all relevant parties, as well as time-stamps the action.
The graphical calculations on time spent on requests, how long they were open for, who worked on a ticket last.
Grouping by priority so you can determine easier what needs to be addressed sooner rather then later. This also helps if Account Management has conversations a technician is not aware of so they can prioritize efficiently.
The email updates that are sent out to the technicians so they are aware of upcoming or stale tickets.
The interface is quite hard work, not very visually friendly
It all just feels a bit old fashioned and needs a reboot
This may be an internal process, but not everyone has access, so quite frequently I have to pick requests up and then take them out of the Supportworks system.
Datto Autotask PSA is a full featured product that can do almost anything you need. There is a significant learning curve to get started which requires several hours spent in product training. Additionally, several hours / days are needed to get clients imported, contracts configured, and integrations implemented. Once the setup and user training is complete, the product is very functional, but it's imperative to not get overwhelmed when starting out.
The portion of Autotask that we've used other companies for prior to using Autotask is the Endpoint Management. The Autotask Endpoint Management (AEM) portal integrates perfectly with their PSA/CRM tools. It's alerting features are much better than the above software as there aren't a bunch of superfluous and unneeded alerts. Instead, it only alerts for things that you specify that you want. Alerts aside, for the PSA/CRM, I don't have much to compare it to as Autotask was the first PSA we tried. It's hard to imagine a PSA having more features or doing a better job than Autotask.
The system 'does what it says on the tin' - it captures and helps manage incoming inquiries - so the positive impact is there.
However, this is not done in the most intuitive or user-friendly manner. This causes frustration at times.
Overall, a single centralized system for managing customer inquiries and requests is paramount for any mid-size business, particularly if this business is service-based