Datto Autotask PSA vs. IFS Assyst

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autotask PSA
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
Autotask PSA is designed as a complete IT Business Management Platform for MSPs, now from Datto (resulting from the Autotask merger with Datto in 2017).N/A
IFS Assyst
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IFS Assyst (formerly Axios Assyst, acquired by IFS March, 2021) is an ITSM product in both SaaS and on-premise configurations - the SaaS version is called assystSaaS. This product competes with BMC Remedy, IBM SmartCloud, Cherwell Service Management, and FrontRange ITSM (now Heat Service Management).N/A
Pricing
Datto Autotask PSAIFS Assyst
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autotask PSAIFS Assyst
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Datto Autotask PSAIFS Assyst
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Datto Autotask PSAIFS Assyst
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
IFS Assyst
8.9
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Expert directory00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Service restoration00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Self-service tools00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
IFS Assyst
9.0
1 Ratings
9% above category average
Configuration mangement00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Asset management dashboard00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
Datto Autotask PSA
-
Ratings
IFS Assyst
8.7
1 Ratings
4% above category average
Change requests repository00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Change calendar00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Service-level management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Datto Autotask PSAIFS Assyst
Small Businesses
Atera
Atera
Score 8.9 out of 10
Agiloft Flexible Service Desk Suite
Agiloft Flexible Service Desk Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 6.8 out of 10
Agiloft Flexible Service Desk Suite
Agiloft Flexible Service Desk Suite
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Planview AdaptiveWork
Planview AdaptiveWork
Score 6.8 out of 10
Ivanti Neurons for ITSM
Ivanti Neurons for ITSM
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Datto Autotask PSAIFS Assyst
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(29 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Datto Autotask PSAIFS Assyst
Likelihood to Recommend
Kaseya
In my opinion, Datto Autotask is exceptionally complicated to set up, manage, and use on a daily basis. I would think the target market for this product would be someone managing a team of 20 - 50 people, possibly more. In my experience, for it to run properly you will need to dedicate at least half an FTE to running this product in an organization of that size per month. I would not recommend it for companies with less than 10 people or for companies that value quick communication with their clients. I would not recommend it for companies using Datto's RMM product. The integration exists, but it is clearly a bolt-on. They were not developed together and they are slow to talk to each other. Frequently you cannot add details from RMM sessions into the PSA without manually copying the ticket number, and if the ticket is more than a week old, then you can't even find it with the ticket number.
Read full review
IFS
I would suggest that in this product class, you get what you pay for. Although it is was sold as SAAS with a nearly 'plug and play' implementation, at least one full time highly trained admin is needed for ongoing support. I would advise a team implementation strategy.
Read full review
Pros
Kaseya
  • The graphical calculations on time spent on requests, how long they were open for, who worked on a ticket last.
  • Grouping by priority so you can determine easier what needs to be addressed sooner rather then later. This also helps if Account Management has conversations a technician is not aware of so they can prioritize efficiently.
  • The email updates that are sent out to the technicians so they are aware of upcoming or stale tickets.
Read full review
IFS
  • IT Asset Management and IT Service Management in one product
  • ITIL framework
  • Highly customisable service catalogue and processes
  • Mature mobility product
Read full review
Cons
Kaseya
  • The GUI is a little dated.
  • Some integrations are limited for not being a Datto product.
  • While not as complex to set up as Connectwise, it definitely requires some serious thought during the initial setup.
  • Email processing could offer more options for parsing keywords and allow for more automation.
  • The mobile app is just not worth using in my experience.
Read full review
IFS
  • Service requests, incident, problem, and change management
  • Knowledge mgmt is not-existent - the product uses a WIKI for it's own knowledge base.
  • Axios help desk does is not knowledgable and does not follow up on reported incidents
  • Training is incomplete - no real resources available except billable by the hour.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Kaseya
After using multiple products on the market, Autotask was intuitive and easy to manage.
Read full review
IFS
At this point, we are stuck with it. We can't afford a change at this point.
Read full review
Usability
Kaseya
The work flow is much better then other competitors
Read full review
IFS
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Kaseya
They are fairly quick at returning a response to a problem and have been able to fix all issues for the most part.
Read full review
IFS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Kaseya
The portion of Autotask that we've used other companies for prior to using Autotask is the Endpoint Management. The Autotask Endpoint Management (AEM) portal integrates perfectly with their PSA/CRM tools. It's alerting features are much better than the above software as there aren't a bunch of superfluous and unneeded alerts. Instead, it only alerts for things that you specify that you want. Alerts aside, for the PSA/CRM, I don't have much to compare it to as Autotask was the first PSA we tried. It's hard to imagine a PSA having more features or doing a better job than Autotask.
Read full review
IFS
Axios assyst outperforms JIRA in every aspect, JIRA is a good job system but when it comes to complex processes and configuration management then JIRA is simply not the right system.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Kaseya
  • We were able to identify the profitability of our entire client base.
  • We identified a loss of over 1 million dollars for time unbilled consultancy fees using metrics derived from Autotask.
  • Autotask helped us serve our client base in a professional manner, it's like having an entire department at your finger tips.
  • Autotask is the heartbeat of our operation.
Read full review
IFS
  • Replacement of 3 systems with Axios assyst
  • Integration with other enterprise systems
Read full review
ScreenShots