TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Dell Avamar

    Score5.7 out of 10
    N/ADell Avamar is a hardware and software data backup and deduplication product. It provides protection and recovery through a complete software and hardware solution when paired with Dell Data Domain for virtual environments, remote offices, enterprise apps, NAS servers, and desktops/laptops.N/A

    Google App Engine

    Score8.4 out of 10
    N/AGoogle App Engine is Google Cloud's platform-as-a-service offering. It features pay-per-use pricing and support for a broad array of programming languages.

    $0.05

    Per Hour Per Instance

    Pricing
    Dell AvamarGoogle App Engine
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Starting Price
    $0.05
    Per Hour Per Instance
    Max Price
    $0.30
    Per Hour Per Instance
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Dell AvamarGoogle App Engine
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Dell AvamarGoogle App Engine
    Considered Both Products
    Dell Technologies
    No answer on this topic
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    57%
    Would buy again
    4 Answers
    92%
    Would buy again
    12 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    57%
    Delivers good value for the price
    4 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    57%
    Happy with the feature set
    4 Answers
    92%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    60%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    3 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    67%
    Implementation went as expected
    4 Answers
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    12 Answers
    Features
    Dell AvamarGoogle App Engine
    Data Center Backup
    Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Dell Avamar and Google App Engine
    Feature
    Dell Avamar
    6.6
    23 Ratings
    24% below category average
    Google App Engine
    -
    Ratings
    Universal recovery8.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Instant recovery8.020 Ratings00 Ratings
    Recovery verification7.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Business application protection8.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multiple backup destinations7.021 Ratings00 Ratings
    Incremental backup identification8.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Backup to the cloud3.610 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deduplication and file compression8.023 Ratings00 Ratings
    Snapshots5.017 Ratings00 Ratings
    Flexible deployment4.013 Ratings00 Ratings
    Management dashboard2.014 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform support8.015 Ratings00 Ratings
    Retention options8.016 Ratings00 Ratings
    Encryption8.015 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Dell Avamar and Google App Engine
    Feature
    Dell Avamar
    -
    Ratings
    Google App Engine
    9.5
    32 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings9.018 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings10.032 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings9.032 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings8.024 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings10.031 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings10.028 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings10.029 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings10.028 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings9.028 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings9.026 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings10.029 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Dell AvamarGoogle App Engine
    Small Businesses
    BDRShield
    Score6.5 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Bacula Enterprise
    Score8.6 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Bacula Enterprise
    Score8.6 out of 10
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Score8.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Dell AvamarGoogle App Engine
    Likelihood to Recommend
    2.0
    (23 ratings)
    9.0
    (36 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.5
    (2 ratings)
    8.3
    (8 ratings)
    Usability
    2.0
    (2 ratings)
    10.0
    (8 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.8
    (4 ratings)
    8.4
    (12 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Dell AvamarGoogle App Engine
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Dell Technologies
    This software is well suited for companies that want to be very in control of their backups but need a simple tool. It could be convenient for them to just buy their own node, locate it in a different location, and set up the jobs for their machines to backup to the cloud with the specific plugins. However, it would not be convenient for companies looking to have a tool that needs to be secure and compliant, and that need to have different other options for business continuity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    App Engine is such a good resource for our team both internally and externally. You have complete control over your app, how it runs, when it runs, and more while Google handles the back-end, scaling, orchestration, and so on. If you are serving a tool, system, or web page, it's perfect. If you are serving something back-end, like an automation or ETL workflow, you should be a little considerate or careful with how you are structuring that job. For instance, the Standard environment in Google App Engine will present you with a resource limit for your server calls. If your operations are known to take longer than, say, 10 minutes or so, you may be better off moving to the Flexible environment (which may be a little more expensive but certainly a little more powerful and a little less limited) or even moving that workflow to something like Google Compute Engine or another managed service.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Dell Technologies
    • Avamar performs data deduplication on the remote host. This greatly reduces the amount of traffic that each backup requires. This even applies to the virtual environment through change block tracking. Backup times are reduced from hours to minutes.
    • The management interface makes it easy to configure and maintain data retention periods. Many times certain data must be kept for an extended period of time. There is a specific menu for managing retention periods.
    • The system is able to recover itself from a hard failure with virtually no loss of backups. There is a checkpoint taken each day that provides a recovery point in the event of a catastrophic failure. Since this is a node based system, the loss of more than one node could require a recovery be performed.
    • While another grid must be purchased, the replication utility allows all backups to be replicated to another grid at a remote location. This ensures the resilience of the backups in the event there is the loss of the primary data center.
    • Also works on HCI devices performing image-level backups as in our primary data center environment
    • There is also now an All-in-One appliance for smaller locations
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Quick to develop, quick to deploy. You can be up and running on Google App Engine in no time.
    • Flexible. We use Java for some services and Node.js for others.
    • Great security features. We have been consistently impressed with the security and authentication features of Google App Engine.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Dell Technologies
    • The client interface has constant JAVA issues and can be slow and chunky. We have often had issues with current versions of JAVA breaking it so it will not even run.
    • The backup clients are split out for function. Although this makes them light, it also makes it cumbersome to upgrade clients. The naming scheme can also be confusing for the clients.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • There is a slight learning curve to getting used to code on Google App Engine.
    • Google Cloud Datastore is Google's NoSQL database in the cloud that your applications can use. NoSQL databases, by design, cannot give handle complex queries on the data. This means that sometimes you need to think carefully about your data structures - so that you can get the results you need in your code.
    • Setting up billing is a little annoying. It does not seem to save billing information to your account so you can re-use the same information across different Cloud projects. Each project requires you to re-enter all your billing information (if required)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Dell Technologies
    I have been using the product for over five years. This has performed so well that with the current system reaching its End-of-Life with EMC next year, I have proposed replacing it with the latest version of the product. Now that it integrates with Data Domain, the cost has been greatly reduced. Instead of the need to purchase many nodes, one Data Domain can replace them creating a significant cost savings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    App Engine is a solid choice for deployments to Google Cloud Platform that do not want to move entirely to a Kubernetes-based container architecture using a different Google product. For rapid prototyping of new applications and fairly straightforward web application deployments, we'll continue to leverage the capabilities that App Engine affords us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Dell Technologies
    The system overall is easy to monitor and see your backup/restore status. The user interface could use updating as it relies on Java and any updates to Java cause the interface to stop working need to be reinstalled
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    I had to revisit the UI after a year of just setting up and forgetting. The UI got some improvements but the amount of navigation we have to go through to setup a new app has increased but also got easier to setup. Gemini now is integrated and make getting answers faster
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Dell Technologies
    Support is very convincing, always eager to solve issues from the root rather than workaround, don't hesitate to take webex, describe the issues to the core and recommend configuration to avoid further issues. We can ask few questions other than the main issue. They don't hesitate to answer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    Good amount of documentation available for Google App Engine and in general there is large developer community around Google App Engine and other products it interacts with. Lastly, Google support is great in general. No issues so far with them.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Dell Technologies
    Avamar has simplied the back up approach in their VE edition and is much easier to use than Data Protector. Backing up multiple VMs takes minutes instead of hours now. Creating policies, retentions, and schedules, is vastly improved and much easier.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    We were on another much smaller cloud provider and decided to make the switch for several reasons - stability, breadth of services, and security. In reviewing options, GCP provided the best mixtures of meeting our needs while also balancing the overall cost of the service as compared to the other major players in Azure and AWS.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Dell Technologies
    • Absolute Zero ROI
    • This appliance does not work in its current state and to update we need to wait 2-3 months
    • Can't wait to get rid of it and replace it with something else. (not even sure if we will be able to get it running before that)
    • [I think] this is one of the worst mistakes we made
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Google
    • Effective employee adoption through ease of use.
    • Effective integration to other java based frameworks.
    • Time to market is very quick. Build, test, deploy and use.
    • The GAE Whitelist for java is an important resource to know what works and what does not. So use it. It would also be nice for Google to expand on items that are allowed on GAE platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots