DemandScience vs. Think ABM

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
DemandScience
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
Think ABM
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Think ABM leverages Sales Nitro, their proprietary AI engine, to apply Intent data over their first-party data. Their USP is Pyschographics which comes in handy during the hand-offs. Sales Nitro provides key insights into the prospects' intent, interests, and psychographics. Enables to build personalized nurture campaigns or tailor one's outreach based on the buyer's personality and interests. Offerings- 1. Lead Gen 2. Media Campaigns 3. Event Registrations 4. Channel…N/A
Pricing
DemandScienceThink ABM
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
DemandScienceThink ABM
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
DemandScienceThink ABM
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
7.6
17 Ratings
3% below category average
Think ABM
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting8.317 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics7.614 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard6.910 Ratings00 Ratings
Intent Data
Comparison of Intent Data features of Product A and Product B
DemandScience
-
Ratings
Think ABM
8.6
1 Ratings
12% above category average
3rd party intent signals00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Downstream intent signals00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Best Alternatives
DemandScienceThink ABM
Small Businesses
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
ZoomInfo Sales
ZoomInfo Sales
Score 8.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Qualified
Qualified
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Demandbase One
Demandbase One
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
DemandScienceThink ABM
Likelihood to Recommend
7.6
(75 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
6.7
(69 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
4.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
DemandScienceThink ABM
Likelihood to Recommend
DemandScience
Demand Science did deliver the quantity of leads without issue. The data for a few was not accurate (bounced when following up). But they agreed to make good by providing substitute leads to meet the quota. Towards the end of my project, they lost a few folks, and so the end of my campaign got a little rough as they were taking over some assignments midway. But we ultimately completed the SOW. I will say that the leads did not perform well in our email cadence - none converted. However, this was a test of the concept for us. Content syndication had a lower cost per qualified lead than some other tactics, so we tested it. Your results may vary, based on your follow-up and your market.
Read full review
Think ABM
In the duration of our campaign, any requests that we made never received any pushback. Whether this was to change reporting types or creative material, Mark and Brian were able to get them implemented with ease. They made any changes swiftly and always kept a close eye on our campaign to ensure that our objectives were being met. We had weekly meetings to discuss campaign performance and they always had constructive suggestions to offer on how we can keep improving the campaign. Each meeting was very productive in discussing next steps - it was a breath of fresh air to have a team that was so knowledgeable about what they do, and truly wanted to help our campaign succeed.
Read full review
Pros
DemandScience
  • The initial pitch and contact from Mason used "show me you know me" well, which we felt was a good sign of company culture and approach to database marketing.
  • Delivery of leads was ahead of schedule.
  • They set expectations, and then delivered what they said they would.
  • The leads matched our criteria as agreed.
  • Regular check ins and catch ups, and patience when thing were taking a bit of time to get sorted here.
Read full review
Think ABM
No answers on this topic
Cons
DemandScience
  • We would like to see more proactive communication on what's working and what's not without requiring a meeting - regular reporting cadence to assess asset quality
  • A dashboard view might be nice as well, again, so we can look at an asset and see how it's performing (or if it isn't) without having to wait on a rep to pull a report or schedule a walkthrough
Read full review
Think ABM
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
DemandScience
Our executives decided to not renew because we were not seeing the ROI they were looking for. However, our executives did not make the best decisions on the data Demand Science provided.
Read full review
Think ABM
No answers on this topic
Usability
DemandScience
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Read full review
Think ABM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
DemandScience
Our rep is always available and quickly responds to any question we have. I haven't worked with other partners who are as proactive and excited to help us as our DemandScience rep is. He reaches out with new ideas and suggestions frequently. They are happy to make any changes needed to the campaigns and make those changes quickly and efficiently. They work well with our execution agency, but are also happy to meet with us directly to provide insights and support.
Read full review
Think ABM
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
DemandScience
They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
Read full review
Think ABM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
DemandScience
I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific product or software and how this could be beneficial, but I'd steer away from it for services.
Read full review
Think ABM
Compared with other vendors, the customer experience that you get with Think ABM is vastly different from other vendors. It's not a simple "plug and play" kind of campaign where you hear from the vendor at the end of the campaign, or at the end of every month where you get a report that just lists your CTR. Not only that, they curate their own TAL to go in tandem with your own list, so that you are able to reach your targeted accounts while increasing your exposure to other companies as well which is great from an awareness standpoint. Their offerings in awareness also consisted of native, display, video, and OTT/CTV - differing from just your traditional display/native options. These can also be paired with lead gen to fully optimize on your ROI.
Read full review
Return on Investment
DemandScience
  • We have been able to grow our lead numbers with high quality leads at a reasonable cost
  • We have been able to generate just the leads we want to support our Business Development team
  • We have been able to get our content in front of our specific TAL
Read full review
Think ABM
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots