Dice TalentSearch vs. Oorwin

DICE Open Web works well when you want to find IT specific candidates that are available in your local area. What I particularly like is that if you post a job, Dice Open Web/Talent Search will return potential candidates that meet your requirements. It is a proactive way they provide candidates from what you could do manually using their IntelliSearch tool to find candidates. I find that DICE is overall much more effective when you have a job to post and the candidates apply rather than doing a blind search. There are too many factors that make candidates returned by DICE Open Web not necessarily interested in your position. When candidates apply they have shown interest and then you can apply the Screener tool to help narrow the pool.

Incentivized

Oorwin is very automated ATS system and once jobs will be posted over vms portal it will add directly here in the Oorwin.Sometime parsing will not work correctly that’s the major issue I have ever.also need to interstate the beeline vms also in the Oorwin currently it was not supporting Dotstaff and Beeline in Oorwin so we need to add the requirement manually

Incentivized

• easy to use - web interface is very user friendly
• easy to customize email templates
• easy to set notifications and alerts for applicants or for job listings by other teams
• easy to find same type of jobs across teams in one place
• ability to turn off when you're no more looking for a job

Incentivized

• Resume searching
• Job posting
• Onboarding
• Monthly and weekly reports
• Performance review

Incentivized

• Dice Open Web seemed to not be able to keep up with other platforms and some features and functionality were either missing or quickly became obsolete.
• It doesn't really seem to remain competitive on the landscape and feel behind in product release and feature updates.
• Some information was outdated and didn't get regularly refreshed or updated it seemed. Just kind of churning the same information as before or the lack of reach was evident over time.

Incentivized

• It will normally work smooth in very higher speed so sometime whenever we have poor connection it’s hard to fetch candidate.
• Need to improvement for c2c vendor list

Incentivized

I'm assuming we will keep using DICE, but Indeed and LinkedIn are starting to prove their value and strength in having candidates/consultants use their services to look for new opportunities.

Incentivized

Dice provides ease of sourcing candidates and is the most useful in staffing industry. However, we still recommend the team to provide older version access to the user which was much easier and flexible to use. Dice posting is the best feature in Dice. The Boolean Search feature in Dice is also very useful.

Incentivized

I received multiple candidates only after hours of posting my jobs on other sites. And for a fraction of the cost! I not only received quality candidates but also candidates who actually matched my requirements. These sites also have the option for proactive outreach and pay-by-click options as well. Some also provide free trials, which Dice does not.

I had used Ceipal and JobDiva before and I found the Oorwin much interactive than the other .Its very easy to learn and train to the new hires .We can send the timesheet and invoice through the Oorwin. JobDiva is also more costly than the Oorwin and Ui is also not much interactive in JobDiva.

Incentivized

• It’s a great portal to use and has many useful features which helps us to search relevant profiles as per client's need.
• Dice really helped us to improve our business as we have closed many candidates through Dice.
• I feel Dice should improve their new search, as it's not highlighting most of the keywords.

Incentivized

• It’s very less time consuming for end to end recruitment process and saves lots of time of recruiter.
• It’s not so costly
• We will get very less response through mass emailing to candidates
• Most of the time email sent through Oorwin went in spam so less response

Incentivized