DronaHQ vs. Gemini vs. Oracle Visual Builder Cloud

If you enjoy being ripped off and ignored, I would highly recommend DronaHQ. If you are unable to configure the app yourself, they will connect you to a contractor. You will be charged by the hour, so its within their interest to drag the project out as long as possible. Once the project is delivered, you may find that the app is super slow e.g. 1-2 minutes for a page to load. When you complain, they will blacklist your email.

Gemini is well suited to help track issues and change requests, projects, bugs, time logs, etc. It is less appropriate for reporting needs or general office management needs.

Visual Builder is very well suited to either extend or augment your other Oracle Cloud or on-premise solutions. For example, you can build a SaaS extension for Oracle HCM with Visual Builder. You can also build a custom worklist app for Oracle or Oracle Process Cloud Service if you don't like the default worklist app.

Incentivized

• charge by the hour
• over promise
• super slow loading time

• It has been pretty good with rewrites and slight edits.
• It has been helpful in project management.
• It has been helpful with easy writing tasks like social media captions or holiday descriptions.

Incentivized

• Visual Tooling
• JavaScript
• RESTful Services

Incentivized

• Not ripping people off
• providing pages that load
• respond to emails

• Speed of processing (on pro model)
• Accuracy of answers (on flash model)
• Veo 3 should be able to use picture prompts when creating videos (without errors)

Incentivized

• Integration with other Oracle products
• Offline tooling
• Recipes

Incentivized

Gemini's development team continues to improve the product and provides a comprehensive roadmap of upcoming features that makes you want to upgrade as soon as a new version comes out.

Like learning to play checkers, the interface is easy, but the strategy has more of a learning curve. Figuring out the best prompts to use to get the desired outcome with less tries is taking me awhile to develop that skill. The images that I am able to generate are close to "camera-ready", but most do require some tweaking in image editing software to fix AI artifacts like distorted faces and randomly spelled words.

Incentivized

I've never had any problems with the support for the Gemini application itself, but it seems every time I re-install (on a single machine), I run into a licensing issue. As a result, I need to go to the app's website and request that my activation key gets reset or resent. In either case, it's a pain, but as I have to reinstall infrequently, it's a small price to pay for an otherwise solid application.

Incentivized

I was charged approx. $10k by DronaHQ to build an app over 6 months with page loading speed of 1-2minutes. Bubble.io took 2 weeks and $1000 to build a far superior app with page loading speed within 2 seconds.

In my case, it's not that Gemini won; I simply use Gemini regularly as a backup plan to compare results obtained with the leading AI in my corporate environment. I believe it's important to have this comparison of results, especially when dealing with critical issues. I think the most powerful AIs for the general public today are ChatGPT and Gemini, in that order, although CoPilot is very well positioned due to its integration with widely used Microsoft products in the corporate world.

Incentivized

I have not used any other products like this.

Incentivized

• ROI is negative 100%

• It's sped up some workflows
• It's provided not accurate information sometimes
• It's a great tool when used in the GSuite with sheets and other drive functions

Incentivized

• Short dev cycles
• Low code
• Easy to manage

Incentivized