Ridder iQ is a manufacturing ERP, from ECI Software Solutions. Ridder iQ includes customer relationship management functionality that is fully integrated, and includes an integration with Outlook for email.
N/A
IFS Applications
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturing…
N/A
Pricing
Ridder iQ
IFS Applications
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Ridder iQ
IFS Applications
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Ridder iQ
IFS Applications
Features
Ridder iQ
IFS Applications
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.0
18 Ratings
22% below category average
IFS Applications
8.7
5 Ratings
15% above category average
API for custom integration
6.117 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Plug-ins
5.915 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
8.1
20 Ratings
3% below category average
IFS Applications
9.8
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Single sign-on capability
7.817 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.419 Ratings
9.75 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.4
19 Ratings
1% above category average
IFS Applications
8.5
5 Ratings
15% above category average
Dashboards
7.117 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Standard reports
6.618 Ratings
8.05 Ratings
Custom reports
8.518 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.5
18 Ratings
16% below category average
IFS Applications
7.5
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Accounts payable
6.818 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.918 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.012 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
6.211 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.714 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
6.414 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Standardized Processes
6.314 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
16 Ratings
24% below category average
IFS Applications
8.9
5 Ratings
12% above category average
Inventory tracking
6.316 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Automatic reordering
7.214 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Location management
5.313 Ratings
9.35 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.7
20 Ratings
1% below category average
IFS Applications
6.0
5 Ratings
26% below category average
Pricing
8.020 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Order entry
7.819 Ratings
8.35 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
7.320 Ratings
7.75 Ratings
Order Orchestration
7.618 Ratings
7.44 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.6
16 Ratings
28% below category average
IFS Applications
3.8
4 Ratings
65% below category average
Billing Management
7.516 Ratings
7.74 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
6.114 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
4.28 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
4.712 Ratings
7.44 Ratings
Period Close
5.614 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.6
13 Ratings
22% below category average
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
66% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
5.013 Ratings
9.74 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
6.112 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
5.612 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
7.74 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.4
16 Ratings
25% below category average
IFS Applications
3.5
4 Ratings
66% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
5.210 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Contract Authoring
5.18 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Contract Repository
4.87 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.810 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Supplier Management
6.016 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.1
7 Ratings
25% below category average
IFS Applications
4.9
4 Ratings
29% below category average
Risk Repository
4.95 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Control Management
5.35 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
5.54 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Issue Detection
4.77 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
7.74 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.4
13 Ratings
6% below category average
IFS Applications
7.4
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Transportation Execution Management
6.412 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
6.312 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
7.13 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
8.34 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
7.7
19 Ratings
5% above category average
IFS Applications
6.6
4 Ratings
11% below category average
Production Process Design
8.116 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Production Management
7.517 Ratings
8.74 Ratings
Configuration Management
8.117 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Work Execution
7.617 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
7.317 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
6.2
16 Ratings
15% below category average
IFS Applications
8.9
4 Ratings
21% above category average
Forecasting
6.213 Ratings
8.44 Ratings
Inventory Planning
6.516 Ratings
9.34 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
6.015 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
5.4
11 Ratings
29% below category average
IFS Applications
4.6
4 Ratings
44% below category average
Proposal Management
5.110 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
5.611 Ratings
8.43 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.2
3 Ratings
54% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
7.13 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
5.63 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Ridder iQ
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
The best in the complete production process. It provides the correct info in a very usable way. It is pretty good in sales, but the lack of discounts for sales goods and sales production is not ideal. On the other hand, ECI provides an excellent service for looking for custom solutions where we need them. Dutch Translation: De beste in het complete productieproces. Het biedt de juiste informatie op een zeer bruikbare manier. Het is redelijk goed in de verkoop, maar het gebrek aan kortingen op verkoopartikelen en verkoopproductie is niet ideaal. Aan de andere kant biedt ECI een uitstekende service bij het zoeken naar maatwerkoplossingen waar we die nodig hebben. This review was originally written in English and has been translated into Dutch using a third-party translation tool. While we strive for accuracy, some nuances or meanings may not be perfectly captured.
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Its nice software but it is very, very slow in webification and integration possibilities by using api's. Untill now the programm has client-server technology unfortunately. And there are far too less no code adjustments possible.
The working environment can be perfectly designed for every user and department, which makes the user-friendliness very good. Adding columns, formatting tables can all be customized to the user. Dutch Translation: De werkomgeving is perfect in te richten voor elke gebruiker en afdeling, wat de gebruiksvriendelijkheid zeer hoog maakt. Het toevoegen van kolommen en het opmaken van tabellen is allemaal aanpasbaar aan de gebruiker.
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Ridder iQ is specialized for our business and has people who bring a lot of knowledge to the table, so Ridder iQ is far more suited than a ERP solution which is not specilized in the make-industry. Furthermore, the customizability of Ridder stands out compared to solutions like ISAH. Therefore, the choice was an easy one, because knowledge and customizability are important criteria. Dutch Translation: Ridder iQ is gespecialiseerd in onze branche en heeft mensen met veel kennis in huis. Ridder iQ is daarom veel geschikter dan een ERP-oplossing, die niet gespecialiseerd is in de maakindustrie. Bovendien onderscheidt Ridder iQ zich qua aanpasbaarheid ten opzichte van oplossingen zoals ISAH. De keuze was dan ook snel gemaakt, want kennis en aanpasbaarheid zijn belangrijke criteria.
IFS Applications is based on Agile Technology which allows organizations to reconfigure user interface as per user requirements and make it user-friendly. Other applications are lagging on many fronts like User Interface, Online help document availability, Implementation methodology, and post-implementation expenses.
Reporting is now centralized and managed. Previously, reports were outside the information systems and there was a risk of incoherence.
Accounting controls are now in place on the overall processes, including production, which helped the company to reduce closing periods or to produce more easily official mandatory accounting files yearly.
Interfaces between the CRM forecast tool and IFS helped to keep the tools in sync, and to decrease the processing times prior to production launch.