ECM XD vs. OpenText XM Fax

ECM -XD is great when you are linking documents of different types and from different sources into a single centralized location. There is no limit to the amount of information that can be retained for a specific complaint, investigation, etc. so situations where documents obtained at different times and from different personnel need to be linked to a single file are ideal. ECM -XD is less ideal for situations in which individual file information is simple with low density, or requiring a high level of customization. The user interface is likely more intuitive for novice users through other software options

Incentivized

XMedius is well suited for a large business with hundreds of fax numbers. Could you imagine trying to manage 1000 individual fax machines? That would be a nightmare! Instead it's all in one neat place

Incentivized

• Great cloud integration of information. Saves a lot of space on network drives and eliminates need for local storage of critical documents.
• Very good comprehensive repository of information. Documents of different format and file extensions are allowed for upload and easy to access.
• Regulatory and auditory compliance. This platform facilitates documentation of customer feedback, and thus ensures GMP, ISO, and FDA compliance.

Incentivized

• Contacted sales to set up the creation of enterprise accounts directly through the dashboard.
• XM Fax Support worked directly with Xerox to correct an issue I had with a device software update. Issues correct within a few days.
• XM Fax provided onsite sales support for sales and technical training.

Incentivized

• Customization could be made easier. Often times we instead have blank unused information fields for individual complaint files.
• Record display layout could be optimized. While very comprehensive, it could be difficult to find specific information.
• Mobile compatibility. I haven't seen any support for mobile compatibility. ECM -XD is typically only accessed on laptop and desktop machines in our organization.

Incentivized

• Error logs include error codes, but sometimes it is hard to understand what it means. Either a shared documentation or detailed error log might help end users better to detect any issue on fax requests.

Customer support for ECM -XD has been very responsive and quick to resolve issues and answer inquiries. Help contact links aren't very visible within the platform, and mobile or tablet support doesn't look to be documented. Overall, support is great from a functional perspective but could be easier to find and use with improvements in layout and interface design.

Incentivized

XMedius does faxing for a quick response from an end user where Egnyte is best suited for secure file transfer.

• Large annual cost savings ($500K+) in hardware and storage space of complaint-related documentation by moving to cloud platform.
• Significant time savings in information retrieval and audit preparation by centralizing information for multiple users to single repository.
• Easier GMP, ISO, and FDA regulation compliance through comprehensive linkage of documentation and customer feedback timeline.

Incentivized

• I m not sure on pricing or how XMedius is pricing solutions now
• Cloud-based / vs On-Prem I think my vote always goes for on Prem
• ROI (not my field)