Ennov Quality vs. M‑Files
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ennov Quality | N/A | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | Ennov offers an enterprise content management system for pharmaceutical and biotech companies. Features include: Quality document management Create and control all corporate documents in an Electronic Document Management System. Access SOPs, Work Instructions, Quality Manuals, Templates from one place, on multiple devices. Quality Process Management Manage and track all quality data from a user-friendly… | N/A |
M‑Files | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | M-Files delivers Context-First Document Management with a metadata-driven architecture that improves productivity across the document lifecycle. By linking documents to the people, processes, clients, and projects that give them meaning, M-Files creates a unified environment that strengthens governance. | N/A |
| Ennov Quality | M‑Files | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Our pricing is competitive for SMB customers. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Ennov Quality | M‑Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Would buy again 18 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 93% Delivers good value for the price 14 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Happy with the feature set 17 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 11 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 11 Answers | |
| Ennov Quality | M‑Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Egnyte Score9.3 out of 10 | pdfFiller Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Epicor ECM Score7.7 out of 10 | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Dashpivot - By Sitemate Score10 out of 10 | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Ennov Quality | M‑Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 9.9 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.9 |
| Usability | - | 8.2 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Online Training | - | 9.1 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 8.2 |
| Configurability | - | 9.6 |
| Product Scalability | - | 10.0 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 7.0 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 7.0 |
| Ennov Quality | M‑Files | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| In-Person Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Online Training | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots | Ennov Quality Screenshots | M‑Files Screenshots |















